Glory Days;816328 wrote:ORC 4513.60 establishes rules for TOWING and establishing a private tow away zone. nothing stating that towing is the ONLY thing that can be done. nothing stating a private company cannot immobilize a vehicle on private property.



to me, that shows that signs can vary, aslong as they have the 3 thing stated in the law.

LJ;816338 wrote:Like I said, it tells you what you CAN do. I know from experience that you cannot boot.

This is going nowhere. Just keep enforcing laws the way you want in NE Ohio, and I will keep living the way I do with laws enforced the way they are in the rest of Ohio.

BTW, do you work in one of the counties that has been sued for improperly enforcing gun laws?

Glory Days;816352 wrote:what is your personal experience?

Cuyahoga. dont know, what happend?

LJ;816355 wrote:We got multiple lawyer's opinions as well as a county prosecutor because we wanted to start booting and we were told we can only tow.



"Buckeye Firearms Foundation, Inc., an Ohio not-for profit foundation, filed a lawsuit today in the Common Pleas Court of Cuyahoga County, Ohio seeking a temporary restraining order and permanent injunction to stop the City of Cleveland from prosecuting law-abiding gun owners under local ordinances that restrict gun ownership and concealed carry (CCW). The lawsuit also asks the Court to declare 20 different local ordinances unconstitutional on the grounds of state preemption of firearm laws."

No wonder you say you would be arrested for what I was saying I would do. Things are enforced differently up there.

Glory Days;816360 wrote:Ok, so if you booted a car, what would you be charged with?

Do you have a link so I can read more?

Plus, what you did would have been the same if it were a gun, 3inch blade or a baseball bat.

LJ;816364 wrote:We were told that you COULD be charged with theft, but that it would just be a hassle where we would have to deal with the police constantly and possibly deal with lawsuits.


http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/node/6528
http://buckeyefirearms.net/node/6721
and Cleveland lost
http://www.biggamehunt.net/news/judge-orders-cleveland-stop-enforcing-local-gun-laws







No, it wouldn't. Not in the sane areas of the state. The ones that train their officers to properly enforce gun laws.

LJ;816389 wrote:You just keep going in circles. I'm done. I'll be sure to stay out of Cleveland.

Glory Days;816412 wrote:gone in circles? you're the one going off a people's opinions that it "could" be against the law.

LJ;816417 wrote:A county prosecutor is just "someone's opinion"? Wow....

Glory Days;816412 wrote:gone in circles? you're the one going off a people's opinions that it "could" be against the law.

Glory Days;816434 wrote:yup. prosecutors arent always right as i pointed out. their opinions vary from city to city and state to state.

dwccrew;816686 wrote:What about the multiple lawyers LJ says he onsulted? I have also consulted an attorney on the matter and that particular attorney agreed with what LJ was told. They can't hold your car hostage, they have no authority.

I'll take several lawyers and a prosecutor's opinion over just yours. They are able to interpret and define law, you are just there to enforce law (which is why often charges are dropped, because the law enforcement officer didn't know what the hell the law meant or how it is applied).

Glory Days;816901 wrote:And as I pointed out, multiple lawyers and judges in ga,nv, and nc have upheld private booting and theft is pretty much the same anywhere.

If prosecutors were always right, why were they enforcing illegal gun laws?

I Wear Pants;817068 wrote:Ashland University booted one of my friend's cars while I was there. Should I have thrown a fit (real question)?

I Wear Pants;817068 wrote:Ashland University booted one of my friend's cars while I was there. Should I have thrown a fit (real question)?