+1SportsAndLady;738280 wrote:Still cannot fathom how human beings can honestly feel anger towards a 20 year old kid for selling something that is theirs, taking advantage of their stardom to obtain certain perks, and living a college life like everyone else is just without the popularity.
Everybody is getting their cut of the $millions that student athletes generate...except the kids themselves. Lots of people making their living off these kids....and of course , making sure they follow the 400+ page rulebook lest they bear the full weight of an NCAA punishment.....a punishment that far exceeds the crime in many cases.
Everybody is making money off the kids...the universities, the NCAA compliance officers..the NCAA officials...even the college coaches are getting paid( BIG BUCKS too). But who is reporesenting the kids? Certainly not their 'agents' LOL....they can't have any. Is that rule convienient or what?
It brings us to the old ethics question of whether you are obligated to follow an unjust rule. If you are driving down a 4 lane divided highway, and the posted speed limit is 25 MPH...the conditions are good and there is not another car on the highway. If you drive 35 are you a criminal? Should you have your license taken away for HALF A YEAR?? ...of course not. You endangered no one, but you did technically violate the law...and now some little backwater town is going to extract its pound of flesh.
Yet this is exactly the kind of thing that the NCAA gets away with.If you want to challenge the NCAA...you have to appeal to the body who made the law in the first place....or you have to sue them in a court of law....and that is exactly what TP and others should do. By taking away their eligibility for 5 games, the NCAA could be costing them thousands if not millions of dollars, depending where they slot in the pro draft.