KR1245
Posts: 4,317
May 19, 2011 8:42pm
BR1986FB;774347 wrote:Windhorst brought up an interesting question when he was on with Reghi & Roda the other day. He asked "if the Cavs offered #1 & 4, plus the trade exception (or whatever matched up) to bring back Lebron, would you do it?" Hypothetical, of course, but I think you already know my answer. That bridge burned LONG ago.
It be tempting, time to move on though
[video=youtube;XNKbHJ3PTu4][/video]
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
May 19, 2011 10:03pm
Says the guy with downs syndrome.Ty Webb;774310 wrote:Are you fucking retarded sleeper???
Seriously...you cant be this dumb
Name ONE player on the Cavs who has a skill set better than Artest or Bynum??
Baron?? Not any more
AV?? Haha..funny
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
May 19, 2011 10:03pm
BR1986FB;774347 wrote:Windhorst brought up an interesting question when he was on with Reghi & Roda the other day. He asked "if the Cavs offered #1 & 4, plus the trade exception (or whatever matched up) to bring back Lebron, would you do it?" Hypothetical, of course, but I think you already know my answer. That bridge burned LONG ago.
Yeah, that would never happen and it isn't like we won a championship with him anyhow.
The Boss
Posts: 541
May 19, 2011 10:05pm
The Heat wouldn't accept that offer. Assume Irving and Kanter for LeBron? No thanks.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
May 19, 2011 10:06pm
Damn...I was happy when Sully decided to stay. Now that the ping pong balls popped our way, I wish he'd have declared. Irving and Sully would make a great pair.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
May 19, 2011 10:07pm
The Boss;774475 wrote:The Heat wouldn't accept that offer. Assume Irving and Kanter for LeBron? No thanks.
Since we're assuming, can we also assume the 45 million hard cap for next year?
To answer the question, no, I would not take him back. He's the best player in the league, but he's an epic douche.
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
May 19, 2011 10:07pm
Footwedge;774480 wrote:Damn...I was happy when Sully decided to stay. Now that the ping pong balls popped our way, I wish he'd have declared. Irving and Sully would make a great pair.
Sully is an interesting one. He seems undersized for where he plays... so i don't know how he translates to the nba game.
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
May 19, 2011 10:10pm
wes_mantooth;774485 wrote:Sully is an interesting one. He seems undersized for where he plays... so i don't know how he translates to the nba game.
Not great.
The Boss
Posts: 541
May 19, 2011 10:11pm
Agreed. He plays like a freakin' man though, so who knows. I think he'll probably be pretty good, won't be the dominator he is on the college level though.wes_mantooth;774485 wrote:Sully is an interesting one. He seems undersized for where he plays... so i don't know how he translates to the nba game.
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
May 19, 2011 10:16pm
wildcats20;774488 wrote:Not great.
I get that feeling too, but i also thought daquan cook fit the nba game perfectly...lol
The Boss
Posts: 541
May 19, 2011 10:18pm
wes_mantooth;774499 wrote:I get that feeling too, but i also thought daquan cook fit the nba game perfectly...lol
Not playing too bad for the Thunder.
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
May 19, 2011 10:19pm
The Boss;774502 wrote:Not playing too bad for the Thunder.
Yeah he seems to have found his footing in OKC.
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
May 19, 2011 10:19pm
The Boss;774502 wrote:Not playing too bad for the Thunder.
True, but i really thought he was going to be a force.
The Boss
Posts: 541
May 19, 2011 10:24pm
wes_mantooth;774507 wrote:True, but i really thought he was going to be a force.
Yeah, a lot of people did, that's just normal "hometown" hype. Same that's going on with Diebler, though not to the same extent.
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
May 19, 2011 10:26pm
And about Sully...
Let's be honest, the Cavs will probably be in the lottery again next season. So the possibility is still there. Plus Barnes will be available, Henson, Zeller, and whoever(they don't matter) else will be out there.
Let's be honest, the Cavs will probably be in the lottery again next season. So the possibility is still there. Plus Barnes will be available, Henson, Zeller, and whoever(they don't matter) else will be out there.
KR1245
Posts: 4,317
May 19, 2011 10:28pm
wes_mantooth;774507 wrote:True, but i really thought he was going to be a force.
I wasnt sure what to think of Cook. I dont know what his season stats were but I'd be shocked if that guy averaged more than 5 pts a game, I expected a little more from him than that
KR1245
Posts: 4,317
May 19, 2011 10:30pm
wildcats20;774520 wrote:And about Sully...
Let's be honest, the Cavs will probably be in the lottery again next season. So the possibility is still there. Plus Barnes will be available, Henson, Zeller, and whoever(they don't matter) else will be out there.
Next years class is supposed to be stacked. Most of the top talent in that draft is still in high school
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
May 19, 2011 10:31pm
wildcats20;774520 wrote:And about Sully...
Let's be honest, the Cavs will probably be in the lottery again next season. So the possibility is still there. Plus Barnes will be available, Henson, Zeller, and whoever(they don't matter) else will be out there.
More than likely....although the bottom of the east still sucks. 20 wins may get you in...lmao
The Boss
Posts: 541
May 19, 2011 10:36pm
Should be a good draft next year, and don't forget, we could see high school players be allowed to make the jump again. I hear the '12 class is stacked with high school talent--especially big men.
robj55
Posts: 9,511
May 19, 2011 10:47pm
wildcats20;774488 wrote:Not great.
Kevin Love 2.0
The Boss
Posts: 541
May 19, 2011 10:49pm
robj55;774559 wrote:Kevin Love 2.0
Hmm, I don't know about that.
robj55
Posts: 9,511
May 19, 2011 10:52pm
The Boss;774562 wrote:Hmm, I don't know about that.
Just my opinion, very similar in the way they use positioning and their bodies. Also, most people don't know that Jared has a great face up game and a nice stroke, he can post up but he could also pick and pop at the next level which is critical since almost every team runs nothing but pick and roll.
The Boss
Posts: 541
May 19, 2011 10:57pm
He's definitely talented. I think his ceiling is higher than Love's, so I wouldn't be shocked if you're right.
hoops23
Posts: 15,696
May 19, 2011 11:50pm
Sully wouldn't be a center in the NBA. In fact, he'll be moving to his natural position, PF, this year for the Bucks.
He does have a very nice face up game, but he never really needed to use it last season.
I think he'll be a very good player in the NBA because he works hard and uses his size to get great position.. I'm thinking a 17/10 type player once he hits his ceiling.
He does have a very nice face up game, but he never really needed to use it last season.
I think he'll be a very good player in the NBA because he works hard and uses his size to get great position.. I'm thinking a 17/10 type player once he hits his ceiling.
robj55
Posts: 9,511
May 20, 2011 12:16am
hoops23;774627 wrote:Sully wouldn't be a center in the NBA. In fact, he'll be moving to his natural position, PF, this year for the Bucks.
He does have a very nice face up game, but he never really needed to use it last season.
I think he'll be a very good player in the NBA because he works hard and uses his size to get great position.. I'm thinking a 17/10 type player once he hits his ceiling.
I agree with you analysis but who said he would be a center? lol