BR1986FB;774347 wrote:Windhorst brought up an interesting question when he was on with Reghi & Roda the other day. He asked "if the Cavs offered #1 & 4, plus the trade exception (or whatever matched up) to bring back Lebron, would you do it?" Hypothetical, of course, but I think you already know my answer. That bridge burned LONG ago.
Says the guy with downs syndrome.Ty Webb;774310 wrote:Are you fucking retarded sleeper???
Seriously...you cant be this dumb
Name ONE player on the Cavs who has a skill set better than Artest or Bynum??
Baron?? Not any more
AV?? Haha..funny
BR1986FB;774347 wrote:Windhorst brought up an interesting question when he was on with Reghi & Roda the other day. He asked "if the Cavs offered #1 & 4, plus the trade exception (or whatever matched up) to bring back Lebron, would you do it?" Hypothetical, of course, but I think you already know my answer. That bridge burned LONG ago.
The Boss;774475 wrote:The Heat wouldn't accept that offer. Assume Irving and Kanter for LeBron? No thanks.
Footwedge;774480 wrote:Damn...I was happy when Sully decided to stay. Now that the ping pong balls popped our way, I wish he'd have declared. Irving and Sully would make a great pair.
wes_mantooth;774485 wrote:Sully is an interesting one. He seems undersized for where he plays... so i don't know how he translates to the nba game.
Agreed. He plays like a freakin' man though, so who knows. I think he'll probably be pretty good, won't be the dominator he is on the college level though.wes_mantooth;774485 wrote:Sully is an interesting one. He seems undersized for where he plays... so i don't know how he translates to the nba game.
wildcats20;774488 wrote:Not great.
wes_mantooth;774499 wrote:I get that feeling too, but i also thought daquan cook fit the nba game perfectly...lol
The Boss;774502 wrote:Not playing too bad for the Thunder.
The Boss;774502 wrote:Not playing too bad for the Thunder.
wes_mantooth;774507 wrote:True, but i really thought he was going to be a force.
wes_mantooth;774507 wrote:True, but i really thought he was going to be a force.
wildcats20;774520 wrote:And about Sully...
Let's be honest, the Cavs will probably be in the lottery again next season. So the possibility is still there. Plus Barnes will be available, Henson, Zeller, and whoever(they don't matter) else will be out there.
wildcats20;774520 wrote:And about Sully...
Let's be honest, the Cavs will probably be in the lottery again next season. So the possibility is still there. Plus Barnes will be available, Henson, Zeller, and whoever(they don't matter) else will be out there.
wildcats20;774488 wrote:Not great.
robj55;774559 wrote:Kevin Love 2.0
The Boss;774562 wrote:Hmm, I don't know about that.
hoops23;774627 wrote:Sully wouldn't be a center in the NBA. In fact, he'll be moving to his natural position, PF, this year for the Bucks.
He does have a very nice face up game, but he never really needed to use it last season.
I think he'll be a very good player in the NBA because he works hard and uses his size to get great position.. I'm thinking a 17/10 type player once he hits his ceiling.