lhslep134;703183 wrote:Dynasty you really don't get it. LOIC has nothing to do with Tressel.
I want you to run through the checklist I posted and tell me the things you don't think OSU does that would make them a target of LOIC.
LOIC has to do with the whole program, I understand that. I don't know exactly what happened, but I'll go through and list things that could potentially be issues:
* A procedure is established for timely communication among various university offices regarding determinations that affect compliance with NCAA rules.
* Informational and educational programs are established to inform athletics boosters of the limitations on their activities under NCAA rules and of the penalties that can arise if they are responsible for rule violations.
* An internal monitoring system is in place to ensure compliance with NCAA rules.
* An external audit of athletics compliance is undertaken at reasonable intervals.
* The chief executive officer and other senior administrators make clear that they demand compliance with NCAA rules and that they will not tolerate those who deliberately violate the rules or do so through gross negligence.
If Tressel was aware back when Yahoo states, that is point #1.
If the tattoo parlor owner is considered a booster (I don't know if he was), that's #2.
I think #3 and #4 would result from any major violation.
If the NCAA has a problem with not only the tattoos, but also factors in Troy Smith and Clarett, then the last point could be reasonable.