wkfan;688410 wrote:yet it warrrants no discussion here or much in the national media.
To be fair, I don't think it's completely an apples-to-apples comparison. Really for two reasons.
(1) As far as I know, it's a 1-and-done arrangement, that won't be an additional annual burden on tax payers. The funding of public sector jobs is an annual burden on tax payers (by "burden" I don't necessarily mean a bad thing, mind you).
(2) The bailout doesn't have as much bad-blood history with many tax payers as this topic does, so I can see more people being passionate about this.
Now, it's no less idiotic that GM employees should somehow be allowed to rely on tax payers for some extra cash so they don't have to feel the bad economy. Ugh, it pisses me off ...
Unless I'm buying a product from a private, commercial, for-profit enterprise ... they should be getting ZERO dollars of my money!
But I digress, this is not the place for such a discussion. As you were.