Prescott wrote:
Who cares. It's women's basketball.
Me.
I began my media career working at a local radio station doing girls basketball games back in 1976 (yes that station was ahead of the curve by highlighting girls sports way back then).
I've had a fondness for girls (or womens) basketball ever since.
Foster is not the greatest coaching mind to have on a bench, and he's not the best recruiter, either. He has gotten much of the talent now on this team because of his assistants as much as anyone.
That said, he's done a remarkable job of changing his way of coaching from a plodding, half-court offense to the athletic group that now runs the court for the Buckeyes.
I never thought he'd do that, and we'd have to see him fired before he'd go kicking and screaming into the 21st Century of women's basketball. So he gets major points from me for that, alone.
Now he has to find a way to best use the talent he has acquired the past three years, and that includes making better use of his guards to drive the lane, and develop better defense down low (two things that killed them with Duke, along with just being really sloppy at handling the ball).
Ohio State SHOULD be a major national power in women's basketball every year, especially given the wealth of talent that the state develops most years.
Amazingly, Foster has improved his roster not by tapping into that talent so much as bringing in out of state jewels to go with a few homegrown ones (like Lavender) he does get to stay home.
I honestly don't expect Ohio State to win a national title under Foster, but I do think one is in their future IF Ohio State makes the right hire when Foster retires.