Buckeye fans, who would you rather have?

Home ▸ Archive ▸ College Sports ▸ Buckeye fans, who would you rather have?
thedynasty1998's avatar

thedynasty1998

Senior Member

6,844 posts
Feb 2, 2011 3:10 PM
No one said they were one dimensional.

And no, go-to does not mean "1 player that they will always rely on when things are down".

Obviously you don't understand the definition of a go-to guy. Will they look to him first? ABSOLUTELY. But he's not the only one that can make a play, which is why they are so dangerous. But he is option #1.
Feb 2, 2011 3:10pm
ytownfootball's avatar

ytownfootball

Bold faced liar...

6,978 posts
Feb 2, 2011 3:14 PM
jesus...you're saying the same thing

You agree
Feb 2, 2011 3:14pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Feb 2, 2011 3:16 PM
thedynasty1998;662311 wrote:No one said they were one dimensional.

And no, go-to does not mean "1 player that they will always rely on when things are down".

Obviously you don't understand the definition of a go-to guy. Will they look to him first? ABSOLUTELY. But he's not the only one that can make a play, which is why they are so dangerous. But he is option #1.

The actual definition of "go to guy" means "the player that is expected to score"

So in other words, if a player is the "go to guy" when they need a score, the ball is given to that player. In other words, Turner last year. This year, it is 5 different guys. Any one of those guys can be that #1 option depending on what the defense gives them. They do not rely on 1 player. This is what I have said all along.

BTW, option #1 would not be "go to". "go to" would be the guy that they give the ball to no matter what ala Jimmer, LeBron, Jordan, etc.

THOSE are all "go to" guys. You are going to sit here and tell me that Sully plays the same role on this team that those guys did? SMH
Feb 2, 2011 3:16pm
thedynasty1998's avatar

thedynasty1998

Senior Member

6,844 posts
Feb 2, 2011 3:21 PM
Not sure if you've ever played basketball or not, but most teams have a go-to guy. And I'm not sure where you got that definition, but I would say it means "player that is expected to make a play".

Again, do I have to explain the difference between a post player that is a team's go-to guy and a guard who is the same? It's quite different.

Can't believe I've wasted my time defending Sullinger as OSU's go to guy.
Feb 2, 2011 3:21pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Feb 2, 2011 3:27 PM
thedynasty1998;662324 wrote:Not sure if you've ever played basketball or not, but most teams have a go-to guy. And I'm not sure where you got that definition, but I would say it means "player that is expected to make a play".

Again, do I have to explain the difference between a post player that is a team's go-to guy and a guard who is the same? It's quite different.

Can't believe I've wasted my time defending Sullinger as OSU's go to guy.

Let's put it this way.

Last year in tight games they drew up plays for Turner at the end.

This year they draw up plays for who is having a hot game.

Get it now?

Also, that definition is from Dictionary.com, meaning it has more behind it than whatever arbitary meaning you have.
Feb 2, 2011 3:27pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Feb 2, 2011 3:29 PM
I cannot believe you guys are still arguing this
Feb 2, 2011 3:29pm
Commander of Pwn's avatar

Commander of Pwn

Junior Member

20 posts
Feb 2, 2011 3:31 PM
SportsAndLady;662332 wrote:I cannot believe you guys are still arguing this

HAHAHAHA

PWNED!!!!
Feb 2, 2011 3:31pm
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Feb 2, 2011 3:33 PM
dynasty, I just gave up--it's frustrating debating with someone who refuses to look at all sides of a discussion. I agree the Buckeyes are a more balanced team than last year, and that they don't have to rely on one player to carry them...BUT, I also believe (as you stated) that every team has a "go to" guy--and in the 2010-2011 edition of TOSU, that guy is Jared Sullinger.
Feb 2, 2011 3:33pm
Commander of Pwn's avatar

Commander of Pwn

Junior Member

20 posts
Feb 2, 2011 3:34 PM
vball10set;662339 wrote:dynasty, I just gave up--it's frustrating debating with someone who refuses to look at all sides of a discussion. I agree the Buckeyes are a more balanced team than last year, and that they don't have to rely on one player to carry them...BUT, I also believe (as you stated) that every team has a "go to" guy--and in the 2010-2011 edition of TOSU, that guy is Jared Sullinger.

PWNED again!

Shit LJ, you are such a moron
Feb 2, 2011 3:34pm
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Feb 2, 2011 3:34 PM
Commander of Pwn;662335 wrote:HAHAHAHA

PWNED!!!!

:confused: seriously?
Feb 2, 2011 3:34pm
Jester's avatar

Jester

Valedictorian Hater

700 posts
Feb 2, 2011 4:29 PM
Being option #1 and the go to guy, are not the same thing.

And Dynasty, how can you say who is wrong and who isn't? It's a matter of opinions. Just because someone has a differing opinion, does not mean they're wrong. Definitions of a "go to" guy can vary from person to person.
Feb 2, 2011 4:29pm
Commander of Awesome's avatar

Commander of Awesome

Senior Pwner

23,151 posts
Feb 3, 2011 11:32 AM
ytownfootball;662318 wrote:jesus...you're saying the same thing

You agree
SportsAndLady;662332 wrote:I cannot believe you guys are still arguing this
Commander of Pwn;662335 wrote:HAHAHAHA

PWNED!!!!
vball10set;662339 wrote:dynasty, I just gave up--it's frustrating debating with someone who refuses to look at all sides of a discussion. I agree the Buckeyes are a more balanced team than last year, and that they don't have to rely on one player to carry them...BUT, I also believe (as you stated) that every team has a "go to" guy--and in the 2010-2011 edition of TOSU, that guy is Jared Sullinger.
Commander of Pwn;662341 wrote:PWNED again!

Shit LJ, you are such a moron

Its hilarious reading two of the biggest idiots on the OC argue.
Feb 3, 2011 11:32am