I'm sorry. But Christmas internet trolling can sometimes be fun.
You are of course allowed to have questions or disagreements with this or any bill without having a better idea.
So these people are all lying when they say they are having a hell of a time getting anything paid for?Mr. 300;613105 wrote:Where have they been denied healthcare?? The new healtcacre law signed takes care of their issues....no lifetime limits and no pre-condition denials. They receive healtcare like the rest of us, right??
So, if I understand this right, we are giving them money for doing their jobs, is that correct??
I Wear Pants;613146 wrote:So these people are all lying when they say they are having a hell of a time getting anything paid for?
Bob is a fireman. Bob is a first responder to 9/11. Bob develops lung and throat cancer and back problems from the 9/11 site. Bob cannot work as a fireman now.jmog;613183 wrote:Getting health care and getting it all paid for are two TOTALLY different things.
Health care and free health INSURANCE are not one in the same.
Bob knew of the dangers the job had when he signed up and took the test. Bob deserves MORE tax payer money for the job he did? Which oh by the way, he gets paid to do in the first place. Bob can not find anothe job to do within the city? Bob can't collect disabilty? Bob can't get any healthcare, period?I Wear Pants;613218 wrote:Bob is a fireman. Bob is a first responder to 9/11. Bob develops lung and throat cancer and back problems from the 9/11 site. Bob cannot work as a fireman now.
What is the proper thing to do in this example? Fuck him right? Shouldn't have been a fireman?
I Wear Pants;613218 wrote:Bob is a fireman. Bob is a first responder to 9/11. Bob develops lung and throat cancer and back problems from the 9/11 site. Bob cannot work as a fireman now.
What is the proper thing to do in this example? Fuck him right? Shouldn't have been a fireman?
Bob also expected compensation if something ever happend to him. What other job is going to hire bob when he is a health risk? How can bob get disability when 9,999 Bobs are also draining the fund at the exact same time? Maybe bob should have just told the families of the victims to go find their loved ones remains themselves?Mr. 300;613259 wrote:Bob knew of the dangers the job had when he signed up and took the test. Bob deserves MORE tax payer money for the job he did? Which oh by the way, he gets paid to do in the first place. Bob can not find anothe job to do within the city? Bob can't collect disabilty? Bob can't get any healthcare period?
Now see, that's exactly ONE of my points and questions. Do we/us/whoever really believe that there was 10,000 first responders and that every one of them is sick from 911?Glory Days;613457 wrote:Bob also expected compensation if something ever happend to him. What other job is going to hire bob when he is a health risk? How can bob get disability when 9,999 Bobs are also draining the fund at the exact same time? Maybe bob should have just told the families of the victims to go find their loved ones remains themselves?
No, actually, it's alright. I was a bit out of line alsoI Wear Pants;613145 wrote:
I'm sorry. But Christmas internet trolling can sometimes be fun.
You are of course allowed to have questions or disagreements with this or any bill without having a better idea.
CenterBHSFan;613547 wrote:Now see, that's exactly ONE of my points and questions. Do we/us/whoever really believe that there was 10,000 first responders and that every one of them is sick from 911?
Another question/point is that do we just ride emotion and throw money at it?
I don't know if that is right or if it's wrong. I just know that something doesn't seem "right" and that I see various red flags with the whole thing.
I also realize that there's alot of people who DO think the best thing to do is throw money at it and feel good about it. We have certainly read that in this thread.
I Wear Pants;614138 wrote:Yeah I mean clean up efforts were still well underway a year after the attack.