derek bomar;579947 wrote:Colon Tickling Steadily While Simultaneously Pleasuring Your Organ
are.........
are you a retard too?
derek bomar;579947 wrote:Colon Tickling Steadily While Simultaneously Pleasuring Your Organ
LJ;579952 wrote:are.........
are you a retard too?
centralbucksfan;579511 wrote:Rebuilding? LMAO!! You don't rebuild when you have all those top ranked recruiting classes, you reload! LOL
Overrated and middle of the road in SEC? Here is a NEWS clip, the Big Ten is neck and neck this year with the big bad SEC pal! Take time to keep up on the latest so you won't continue to make yourself look as bad as you are with comments like that.
Ty Webb;579529 wrote:Then 2004 wasn't a rebuilding year for Ohio State when they went 8-4? They just sucked that year then right?
And tell me what conference is any different then that? The SEC East winner had 3 losses. 2nd best team, Florida had 5 losses (4-4 conf.). That division is almost a JOKE to be honest. The SEC West has Auburn obviously. But after that, we are looking at two 2 loss teams(LSU, Ark) and a 3 loss Bama team.like_that;580169 wrote:Sorry, but the big ten consisted of 3 11-1 teams that beat up on teams that could only win 7 games at best (most wins came vs cupcake OOC games). Not nearly as "neck and neck" as you say. I still stand by my conference rankings near the beginning of the year when I said the Big Ten is behind the SEC and Big 12.
Other than that, Gibby is a moron.
centralbucksfan;580386 wrote:And tell me what conference is any different then that? The SEC East winner had 3 losses. 2nd best team, Florida had 5 losses (4-4 conf.). That division is almost a JOKE to be honest. The SEC West has Auburn obviously. But after that, we are looking at two 2 loss teams(LSU, Ark) and a 3 loss Bama team.
Is the SEC better? Yes, I'll give you that. But its NOT by that much. And with 1 more conference team, that certainly helps with their depth of being able to be better overall. We'll see how the bowl games play out as well.