LJ;578318 wrote:It doesn't get called back. Happened to Santonio Holmes against ND in 2005
Tiger2003;578498 wrote:Holmes did vs Michigan in Ann Arbor did he not?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
He was flagged in both games.
LJ;578318 wrote:It doesn't get called back. Happened to Santonio Holmes against ND in 2005
Tiger2003;578498 wrote:Holmes did vs Michigan in Ann Arbor did he not?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
dwccrew;578510 wrote:He was flagged in both games.
hoops23;577749 wrote:Why should you be flagged for such a mild celebration? Seriously?
If it's truly nothing they should quit doing it.killer_ewok;578485 wrote:... But again, those "Block O" calls were a joke. Let that shit go. That's nothing.
superman;578672 wrote:Posey was flagged for the "O" and not the dive. The ref clearly said "after the touchdown" it would not have gotten called back if it was for the dive. That rule takes effect next year.
slingshot4ever;578676 wrote:He was flagged for dive, not block o. Others have dove into the end zone this year and everytime the penalty has been assessed on the kick off. You must not watch much football.
slingshot4ever;578673 wrote:So many incorrect statements on here that I can't quot ethem all:
1. Santonio Holmes was flagged in both the UM and ND games, but both were NOT for diving. UM was for diving as no one was really that close to preventing him from getting in the endzone. The ND one was for pointing up at the sky before getting into the endzone at which point Zibby almost knocked the ball out of Holmes hands.
2. Posey WAS flagged for the dive. I found this to be a crappy call because two defneders were coverging on him from both sides and I can see why he felt it necessary to dive into the end zone.
3. The Block O flag was then after the Herron TD, NOT the Posey TD. After Herron went to a knee, Adams (#75) came into the picutre and flashed the Block O on his gloves to the crows. The call in this one was for flashing a sign to the crowd.
Hope this clears everything up.
superman;578688 wrote:The ref clearly said "after the touchdown" was when the penalty occured. I heard it live and just watched the replay. You must not speak much english.
I don't think it was for diving across the goal either. I base that on the explanation the the TV announcers gave.WebFire;578703 wrote:... I am 99% certain it was NOT for diving.
WebFire;578703 wrote:Funny to claim incorrect statements and then make bold proclamations on what the call was for. Can you cite your source that tells you what the foul was for? I am 99% certain it was NOT for diving.
Con_Alma;578705 wrote: I base that on the explanation the the TV announcers gave.

Scarlet_Fever;578458 wrote:Back then it didn't. I know last year there was talk of changing this for this year and making it so it is called back. Didn't think they went through with that plan though.
osu45804;578789 wrote:So THIS is Unsportsmanlike? Why have Nike make the gloves to do this anyway then? lol
...
slingshot4ever;578706 wrote:Don't use plural verbiage when you are only questioning one of three statements. No, I don't have a source NO ONE DOES because they don't track the reasons for penalties (nor did the ref announce what the unpsrtsmanlike conduct was like they did for Adams).
vball10set;578869 wrote:the SEC stated that they would enforce this next season--don't know about other conferences



