skank;566244 wrote:You do know you can't use that VCash to help lure kids to Mooney don't you?
I don't get it...
skank;566244 wrote:You do know you can't use that VCash to help lure kids to Mooney don't you?
skank;566261 wrote:I know you don't....The new recruits do.
Thinthickbigred;565136 wrote:Look at Ursulin FB team they are almost all black ..the band is white and the student section is white .... You think those kids are catholic? yeah maybe a few .....password started the discrimination BS in his comment I quoted .... Its just crazy .... Ursulin and Mooney are all star teams they aint catholic schools ..Not on the football field ...
I'll say it again...how funny would it be if they put a multiplier in place and Mooney and Ursuline stay in Divisions 3 and 5. THAT would be absolutely hilarious.Con_Alma;566265 wrote:My AD believes from the meetings he's had that the solution will be in the form of a multiplier and it will be in place after the next two year divisional restructure.
password;566268 wrote:So you are saying that blacks can not be of the catholic religion and only whites are allowed to be baptized catholic?
That is really messed up dude.
It certainly would be entertaining!!!!sherm03;566275 wrote:I'll say it again...how funny would it be if they put a multiplier in place and Mooney and Ursuline stay in Divisions 3 and 5. THAT would be absolutely hilarious.
...
Con_Alma;566278 wrote:It certainly would be entertaining!!!!
sherm03;566287 wrote:It's highly possible. If I'm not mistaken, at the last realignment, Mooney was D3 by 1 student. I don't know what the figures are now, but if they dropped by a few boys, that puts them back in D4. The multiplier would put them back up to D3. I would laugh so hard!
It isn't only ignorant, it is a false statement. There are more non-white Catholics than white Catholics.password;566268 wrote:So you are saying that blacks can not be of the catholic religion and only whites are allowed to be baptized catholic?
That is really messed up dude.
skank;566298 wrote:A few less...."academic" scholarships, and they very well could drop a few boys. To quote the worst President of our lifetime....Strategery.
sherm03;566312 wrote:And maybe if your school "doesn't have enough room" for a couple more open enrollment students, you could drop down to D2 and then you won't have to play all those big bad Private schools that you're so afraid of.
I object. It's cheap entertainment watching skank step on his dick so much. Let it roll!coyotes22;566176 wrote:Id say this thread has now ran its course.
I motion to close it,,,,,,, Any Seconds?
sherm03;566312 wrote:And maybe if your school "doesn't have enough room" for a couple more open enrollment students, you could drop down to D2 and then you won't have to play all those big bad Private schools that you're so afraid of.
fish82;566333 wrote:I object. It's cheap entertainment watching skank step on his dick so much. Let it roll!
skank;566337 wrote:Afraid of? Funny. One of the smallest DI teams in the state, in the last decade, we have played:
Ignatius 10 X
St Ed 3X
Day. Cham Jul 2 X
Benedictine 2X
Elder 1X
Moeller 1X
Ursuline 2X
skank;566298 wrote:A few less...."academic" scholarships, and they very well could drop a few boys. To quote the worst President of our lifetime....Strategery.
I'm pretty sure that skank IS actually afraid of the private schools.dover2092;566517 wrote:If the Cleveland Browns had to recruit from the Cleveland city limits only, and all of the other NFL teams drafted from colleges across the country, would it be fair? ....of course not. That is the argument public schools are making. No one is afraid of playing Catholic schools; it just isn't apples to apples.
dover2092;566517 wrote:If the Cleveland Browns had to recruit from the Cleveland city limits only, and all of the other NFL teams drafted from colleges across the country, would it be fair? ....of course not. That is the argument public schools are making. No one is afraid of playing Catholic schools; it just isn't apples to apples.
I can see your point. However, is it fair to force Louisville St. Thomas Aquinas (Div 5)...who can probably count on one hand how many times they've even made the playoffs in the last 15 years...to be subject to a multiplier and have to play up in Div 4?dover2092;566533 wrote:sherm03 - that is fine in Cincinnati, Columbus or Cleveland. I'm talking about the rest of Ohio.
Can you honestly say that Strasburg (Div 5, village population 2300) vs. Ursuline (Div 5, unlimited enrollment for top athletes from across the state) is a fair, equally matched contest of coaches' and athletes' ability and dedication?
C'mon.....
sherm03;566582 wrote:I can see your point. However, is it fair to force Louisville St. Thomas Aquinas (Div 5)...who can probably count on one hand how many times they've even made the playoffs in the last 15 years...to be subject to a multiplier and have to play up in Div 4?
All the complaining centers around 2 separate factors: Mooney/Ursuline...and the big name Div 1 privates. A multiplier does nothing to the D1 privates...so the whole thing comes down to Mooney and Ursuline.
People are seriously considering changing the rules and affecting every team in the state because of Mooney and Ursuline?! That's absolutely absurd.
And I've asked this before and haven't gotten an answer. Let's say Mooney and Ursuline each move up...and they continue to go deep in the playoffs every year. What's next? Do they have to go with a higher multiplier? Where does it end?