Writerbuckeye;553117 wrote:I'm gonna call BS on that. No company is going to allow its supervisors to do that without punishment, because it would lose its workforce, not to mention lawsuits that would follow.
But nice diversion away from the subject at-hand.
Yes, the drunk involved was offered rehab and refused it -- but it didn't matter. She'd apparently been through it a couple times previous and it obviously didn't work. So the taxpayers were ripped off most likely because this drunk wasn't committed to getting better, but was still keeping a nice cushy job without doing any work.
Oh and did I mention the lawsuit she filed against both the state and several individuals, including me, that had to be defended at taxpayer costs as well. Oh hell, whats a few more thousand dollars when this drunken bitch has already cost the state tens of thousands, already.
But enough of my story...let's get back to the ass whipping you're getting. It's far more entertaining.
you can call it what you want , but when all the supervisors are related what punishment is going to be handed out. do you think for one minute a father is going to fire his son or a son in law?
