fan_from_texas;552165 wrote:Objection, non-responsive?

You didn't respond to a single one of the points I made. Instead, you cited some random crap about (1) GWB's tax break (which, by the way, benefited everyone--the "top 2% issue" is with regard to the extension of the tax cuts, not the tax cuts themselves), and (2) that I don't think the "top 2%" should have to pay their fair share. It's not worth getting into what their "fair share" is, as I somehow don't think we'll see eye-to-eye on it.



Regardless, though, do you care to respond to the substance of my post? Or are you going to continue to post this mindless drivel? It's folks like you who give unions a bad name--if you want to argue your point, fine, but when you repeat talking points with no substance and then attack people who disagree with you, you make it easy for the rest of us to paint all union guys with the same brush.

If you'd prefer just to scream and shout, and then pout when someone demonstrates the inanity of your position, I'm sure there are plenty of middle schools around where you can contest the intellectual high ground.

KnightRyder;552202 wrote:because you didnt make one good point , all you spew is the same shit fox airs on a daily basis. maybe if you could form your own ideas , i might listen. till then i view as some bible thumpin mentally weak conservative dweeb that is afraid of anyone that threatens life as they know it. the bottom line is union are and they arent going anywhere despite all your whining and the whining of the rest of your pathetic cronies on left. your post have no substance , they are merely the ramblings of a jibbering idiot. go find a drool cup

fan_from_texas;552208 wrote:I don't really feel the need to defend my intellect here. I feel confident that if people read my posts and then read yours, they're not going to be handing me the drool cup. But for what it's worth, I've never watched Fox News in my life, nor do I listen to Rush (or any talk radio for that matter), nor do I vote straight R ticket. I imagine it's probably easier for you to assume that anyone who disagrees with your restatement of history and economics (in such a way as to totally rewrite what actually happened) must be a "bible thumpin mentally weak conservative dweeb that is afraid of anyone that threatens life as they know it."

I would recommend that you continue posting on this thread, however, as I think you're probably doing a better job destroying the credibility of your position than I am.

I Wear Pants;552340 wrote:It was in a nutshell what the Rally to Restore Sanity was about.

KnightRyder;551866 wrote:now that is total nonsense. did you forget GWB's tax break. oh thats right i forgot you feel the top 2% shouldnt have to pay their fair share.

fan_from_texas;552183 wrote:Well, this sort of low-brow talking-point no-substance nonsense brings down the level of political discourse and makes it impossible for there to be any real exchange of ideas. Reading his posts makes me feel like I'm stuck in a Bing commercial, where everything someone says gets filtered through a search engine and random, non-responsive crap comes out the other end. He doesn't even bother responding to direct questions or points--he just reiterates an unrelated talking point that appears to have one of the same words in his mantra.

CenterBHSFan;552386 wrote:I'm starting to warm up to KnightRyder, though. And, if Gibby isn't careful, he might lose his position here on this forum

queencitybuckeye;552359 wrote:The top 2% pay their share. And part of mine. And that of 40 or so others who pay nothing.

KnightRyder;552458 wrote:no they dont pay their fair share. i pay a higher percentage than they do

KnightRyder;552458 wrote:no they dont pay their fair share. i pay a higher percentage than they do

believer;552350 wrote:It may have been what the Rally to Restore Sanity was allegedly about but from what I observed, it was largely whiny-ass leftists wearing their own talking points designed to belittle those in the Tea Party movement (particularly those who participated in the Glenn Beck rally) and conservatives in general. But I defend their right to insult whomever they wish! Just sayin'....

KnightRyder;552202 wrote:because you didnt make one good point , all you spew is the same shit fox airs on a daily basis. maybe if you could form your own ideas , i might listen. till then i view as some bible thumpin mentally weak conservative dweeb that is afraid of anyone that threatens life as they know it. the bottom line is union are and they arent going anywhere despite all your whining and the whining of the rest of your pathetic cronies on left. your post have no substance , they are merely the ramblings of a jibbering idiot. go find a drool cup

Fab4Runner;552769 wrote:So you copy and paste an article without even citing it and FFT is the one spewing talking points? Interesting.

Writerbuckeye;552241 wrote:FTW

Belly35;552807 wrote:Yes he did ....... is that low
KnightRyer took word for word from the ...wait for it ....... wait for it ......... Politicususa

queencitybuckeye;552542 wrote:Unless you play a bunch of games with combining various taxes (some of which aren't taxes at all), you don't.

Forum rules call for proof of such claims. Please provide your tax returns, and those of a representative sample of the top earners.

KnightRyder;552839 wrote:yea i took a page out the FFT and belly book

Belly35;552863 wrote:Oh my! I was going to rip you a new asshole …However I will give this pleasure to FFT.
I’m going to sit back and enjoy the verbal trashing you are about to receive….. You have been weighed, you have been measured, and you have been found wanting

queencitybuckeye;552865 wrote:I'm open to any other method of proving (per forum rules) the claim you made. Or you could simply admit that it's more shit you just made up.