ccrunner609;490057 wrote:I remember some nut chasers talking about ND being 4-0 at this point and I was bashed for 0-4 start......Looks like I was close with a 1-3 start. Calling it now 5-7 at best.
All hail ccrunner! He was wise enough to know Notre Dame's most important player would have been sidelined by the medical staff for nearly half the Michigan game, and that Michigan State would be able to run a play with 00:00 left! Tell us, how do you do it?
All hail ccrunner! He is smart enough to know that if a kid gets an offer from Alabama (G. Atkinson, Lynch, Prestwood), Florida (Tuitt, Lynch, Rabasa, Prestwood), Southern Cal (G. Atkinson, Hegarty, Koyack, Prestwood), Ohio State (Lynch, Koyack), and Texas (Hegarty), if he ever commits to Notre Dame is instantly becomes futile and overrated. Tell us, wise ccrunner, what makes your prospect evaluation unmatched in accuracy? "Notre Dame players suck." STOP THE PRESSES!
All hail ccrunner! For he knows it is
impossible that Notre Dame's losses are in large part to chance and a myriad of mental errors. Only a man as wise as ccrunner would know it's
impossible that Notre Dame's obvious mental lapses are the result of switched from a 4-3 to a 3-4, and a pro system to the spread. Only a man as wise as ccrunner would know it's purely the players' futility, and not the learning curve, causing the mental lapses and mistakes during the game.
More likely, you're a hate-filled fuck who knows more about hopscotch and kickball for gym class than you ever will about football.
Jim Tressel went 7-5 in his first season at Ohio State, why does everyone forget that? Of his five losses, four were within a touchdown. Did we hear "oh this guy can't coach!" after he lost to UCLA his second game 6-13? Probably by a few. But you probably heard "damn this team looks more competent than Cooper's 1999 and 2000 teams, even in a tough loss." I honestly see a few similarities between Tressel's first season and Kelly's. Tressel needed to change the mentality at Ohio State and get them to play with a different mindset, Kelly needs to instill fundamentals and make up for all of the coaching/development that simply didn't happen. Tressel's 7-5 season was thought of as a success because he beat Michigan, something his predecessor couldn't do well enough. Kelly's 7-5 season (my personal guess, maybe 8-4) will be looked at as a success because he will beat Southern Cal, something his previous two predecessors couldn't do.
ccrunner609;490057 wrote:Calling it now 5-7 at best.
So you're saying it's impossible they go 6-6 or better? Care to wager an avatar on it, oh wise ccrunner.