V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Sep 18, 2010 4:14pm
He was 22 of 29 for 235 yds. w/2 scores--to go along w/2 picks--and the Buckeyes won big, and are 3-0. It's a long season, but IMO he's still in the running...and who said anything about handing anybody anything ?
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 18, 2010 4:15pm
perhaps you forgot this?vball10set;487278 wrote:and the 2010 Heisman Trophy goes to....
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Sep 18, 2010 4:24pm
Ryan Mallet is in the discussion BY FAR
70 of 100 for 1081 yards, 9 tds and 2 INTs
70 of 100 for 1081 yards, 9 tds and 2 INTs
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 18, 2010 4:26pm
wow that is ridiculous.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Sep 18, 2010 4:26pm
oh, and his passer rating is a 186
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 18, 2010 4:28pm
Next week will be huge for him. They don't have to win I don't think but they need to be competitive at least.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Sep 18, 2010 4:30pm
Right now I would have to say
1. Ryan Mallet
2. Denard Robinson
3. TP
4. Kellen Moore
TP is in because his stats have been what they should and he put up 346 total yards on a top 15 team (and a top 25 defense)
1. Ryan Mallet
2. Denard Robinson
3. TP
4. Kellen Moore
TP is in because his stats have been what they should and he put up 346 total yards on a top 15 team (and a top 25 defense)
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 18, 2010 4:32pm
Can't disagree with that. All of those guys and probably a few more will be in the running. Ingram was off to a pretty decent start today too. I think his first rushing attempt went for 40+ and his first 4 were for 102 yards.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Sep 18, 2010 4:34pm
karen lotz;488330 wrote:Can't disagree with that. All of those guys and probably a few more will be in the running. Ingram was off to a pretty decent start today too. I think his first rushing attempt went for 40+ and his first 4 were for 102 yards.
Yeah, but aren't they playing otterbein or something?
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 18, 2010 4:35pm
Close, Duke. They are a "BCS" team at least. 5 carries 119 yards 2 TD's early in the 2nd quarter.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Sep 18, 2010 4:37pm
karen lotz;488332 wrote:Close, Duke. They are a "BCS" team at least. 5 carries 119 yards 2 TD's early in the 2nd quarter.
coming into this game Duke had the #89 rush d
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 18, 2010 4:40pm
You are right, he sucks.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Sep 18, 2010 4:41pm
karen lotz;488336 wrote:You are right, he sucks.
what the fuck?
christ you are confrontational
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 18, 2010 4:45pm
sarcasm. Every post I made about his game you discredited it. I never said Duke was a good team. Either way 5/119/2 in your first action 10 days removed from knee surgery isn't terrible.LJ;488337 wrote:what the fuck?
christ you are confrontational
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Sep 18, 2010 4:47pm
karen lotz;488340 wrote:sarcasm. Every post I made about his game you discredited it. I never said Duke was a good team. Either way 5/119/2 in your first action 10 days removed from knee surgery isn't terrible.
No I didn't. I was just saying that it doesn't propel him back to the top of the heisman talk. Saine had 109 and 2 tds on 9 carries against Marshall, maybe we should talk Heisman for him too
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 18, 2010 4:49pm
Did Saine win the Heisman last year? I don't remember. Ingram will be in the discussion if he continues to play like he did last year and so far today.
C
cats gone wild
Posts: 2,651
Sep 18, 2010 4:51pm
vball10set;488306 wrote:He was 22 of 29 for 235 yds. w/2 scores--to go along w/2 picks--and the Buckeyes won big, and are 3-0. It's a long season, but IMO he's still in the running...and who said anything about handing anybody anything ?
Wow, congrats. Man, is Pryor having impressive #'s against nobodies. Alot of QB's can have good stats vs. Marshall, Ohio and a overranked Miami. But, Pryor has the next 3 weeks to pad his stats against Eastern Mich, Illinois and Indiana. FIVE creampuffs out of 6 games. Man.......the Big 10 is tough!!
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Sep 18, 2010 4:54pm
cats gone wild;488347 wrote:Wow, congrats. Man, is Pryor having impressive #'s against nobodies. Alot of QB's can have good stats vs. Marshall, Ohio and a overranked Miami. But, Pryor has the next 3 weeks to pad his stats against Eastern Mich, Illinois and Indiana. FIVE creampuffs out of 6 games. Man.......the Big 10 is tough!!
Pride, you're going to hell. Maybe you should take that bible quote out of your sig, as you aren't a very good christian
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Sep 18, 2010 4:54pm
karen lotz;488344 wrote:Did Saine win the Heisman last year? I don't remember. Ingram will be in the discussion if he continues to play like he did last year and so far today.
Ah, I see. The Heisman is now a career award
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 18, 2010 4:58pm
I don't think I said that. He won the Heisman last year, obviously if he puts up similar numbers this year voters are going to remember him. Half of the voters don't know who Saine is. I guess this is difficult for some to understand.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Sep 18, 2010 4:59pm
karen lotz;488364 wrote:I don't think I said that. He won the Heisman last year, obviously if he puts up similar numbers this year voters are going to remember him. Half of the voters don't know who Saine is. I guess this is difficult for some to understand.
You're saying it right there.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 18, 2010 5:01pm
Did you skip over the "this year" part? How can you honestly compare Ingram and Saine? Are you really that dense?
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Sep 18, 2010 5:05pm
karen lotz;488367 wrote:Did you skip over the "this year" part? How can you honestly compare Ingram and Saine? Are you really that dense?
You actually have no idea what I am saying.
You said "Look what ingram is doing already!"
and I am saying "if that is all you need to get into the Heisman talk, then look at Saine"
Then you are saying "but Ingram won the Heisman last year"
and I say "ok, so it's a career award?"
and you say "if you really are comparing saine to ingram you are dense"
Obviously I am not comparing Saine to Ingram. I am saying that ONE GAME does not make a Heisman contender, nor do I think it should be a career achievement award. Obviously you think the opposite.
karen lotz
Posts: 22,284
Sep 18, 2010 5:10pm
Ok. Do you think the voters have completely forgotten that Ingram won the Heisman last year? IF he continues to put up numbers like he has for the remainder of this season (read: more than one game) he will be in the discussion. Lets see after this weekend where Ingram is on all of the pundits Heisman lists. After one game he will be in the mix. The voters are human, I'm not saying its a career award either, but for you to say that last year is completely erased from their memory is you being dense.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Sep 18, 2010 5:11pm
karen lotz;488378 wrote:Ok. Do you think the voters have completely forgotten that Ingram won the Heisman last year? IF he continues to put up numbers like he has for the remainder of this season (read: more than one game) he will be in the discussion. Lets see after this weekend where Ingram is on all of the pundits Heisman lists. After one game he will be in the mix. The voters are human, I'm not saying its a career award either, but for you to say that last year is completely erased from their memory is you being dense.
Just go on with whatever you want to think and go on thinking whatever it is you are thinking i am saying (or being "dense' about for that matter). I'm done with this stupid argument.