Hb31187;480521 wrote:Whos been more impressive?
TERRELLE PRYOR DUHHHHHH
Hb31187;480521 wrote:Whos been more impressive?
karen lotz;480526 wrote:TERRELLE PRYOR DUHHHHHH
Obviously it is still early... but yes Robinson is by far the front runner.
DR- 430 pass yds, 1 TD, 455 rushing yards 3 TD = 885 total yards
TP- 480 pass yds 4 TD, 130 rushing yards 1 TD = 610 total yards.
I'm not saying Robinson will win it, but you have to give him the nod at this point. And before you say anything about the competition, consider that Ohio State plays the vaunted Bobcats of Ohio University and then an Eastern Michigan squad that went 0-12 last year. You have to disregard TP's stats the next few weeks if you want to play the "how tough is his competition?" card
The big stat will be TP is 12-0 and DR will be 7-5.
jordo212000;480546 wrote:what part of currently do you not understand?
Blinded with hatePick6;480632 wrote:really...we are comparing frontrunners for heisman in week 2? It will be the same ol Michigan as last year. Beat a couple scrubs then start crying "Forcier for Heisman" or this year its "Shoelacefor Heisman". It will be the same thing as last year. They will finished 7-5 at best
And Gibby. Where was Miami's "speed". And please dont try to make a case about the officials..OSU had their 1st TD called back on a weak holding penalty. When Miami returned the kickoff for a touchdown, there was a clear block in the back no call
Pick6;480632 wrote:really...we are comparing frontrunners for heisman in week 2?l
tk421;479911 wrote:Raining now in the Shoe. Slight advantage to Miami if it starts to pour.
Which makes them better in it? Hardly.tk421;479917 wrote:I'm pretty sure Miami plays/practices more in the rain than OSU.
Or maybe OSU's defense is just that good. Did you see the hits the DB's were putting on the Miami receivers? NAsty!tk421;479986 wrote:Man, stop throwing interceptions! Wow, Miami is killing themselves in this game.
tk421;479988 wrote:without these picks, Miami is winning this game. Talk about shooting yourself in the foot.
You are a buffoon.osu45804;480082 wrote:FUCK YOU TRESSEL
Slow down there buddy. The Bucks are right where they should be and Pryor is not even a top 5 right now. Needs to work on his short passes and better decision making.ccrunner609;480135 wrote:Bucks should be ranked #1 and TP has to be in the lead for the heisman
He had more than 14. He had 17 or 19. Can't remember which number but it's one of them.Big Gain;480171 wrote:Not to worry, Harris is a turnover machine. He's WAY ahead of last years pace when he had 14 INTs. Heisman candidate??? LOL
Gift wrapped? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. OSU's defense dialed Miami's offense. Picking passes off, knocking the snot out of the Miami receivers. Dominating the LOS. This game was won by the Buckeyes DEFENSE!Ty Webb;480190 wrote:Um no...not till Alabama loses and Denard Robinson has to be No.1 on every Heisman Ballot
Refs tried to screw Miami at every turn...but it didn't matter as they didn't play well enough to win
Ohio State did not look very strong today....Miami pretty much gift-wrapped this game for them
Ohio State did not win this game....Miami lost it
Refer to my above response to your other clueless post. Also, USC played far from perfect last year and still beat the Bucks. The fact is Miami was not nearly as good as OSU this year. It showed as the Miami offense couldn't do shit. Miami had the better special teams and that is it.Ty Webb;480207 wrote:Why would I be jealous....my team won 38-14
Again...Ohio State did not win this game....Miami lost it
You have to play a 100% perfect game to win at Ohio State....because you aren't going to get shit in terms of calls
Why? I'll give you that @Iowa and @Wisky will be tougher than this Miami game, but Michigan is doing exactly what they did last season. A come from behind in the last minute win over Notre DAme (who is not a worl beater) and now people think Michigan is back? Let's wait and see if Robinson is this impressive when he is playing teams that know how to play defense. When 1 man is your offense, that doesn't say much. Also, 500 yards by 1 guy and they only score 28 points?Ty Webb;480249 wrote:I agree....but they can't play the way they did today and beat Iowa,Wisconsin,and maybe even Michigan
Ty Webb;480271 wrote:No jackass...I was born half an hour from Gainsville....maybe you should learn what you're talking about before you speak
I agree that Robinson has had impressive numbers, and if he continues to do so he will be a frontrunner. IMO, the reason is is because he wasn't mentioned in the pre-season watch list, therefore he needs to work his way up the ladder. That being said, Pryor WAS mentioned, and has been impressive against two worthy opponents, as has Case Keenum, Kellen Moore & Ryan Mallett, amomg others...just sayin'Hb31187;480521 wrote:Whos been more impressive?
Hb31187;480521 wrote:Whos been more impressive?
Automatik;480834 wrote:Great W for OSU. SILENCE the haters.
centralbucksfan;480886 wrote:Wishful thinking.Come on now, we all know Miami sucks and is highly overrated.
karen lotz;480906 wrote:lol now the cold weather argument is being applied to Big Ten teams not named Ohio State? Come on. Robinson is a stud, how you can say anything else is beyond comprehension.
karen lotz;480906 wrote:lol now the cold weather argument is being applied to Big Ten teams not named Ohio State? Come on. Robinson is a stud, how you can say anything else is beyond comprehension.
I haven't really seen/read anything from Kelly other than the on field comments directly after the game and I don't recall much of that either.lhslep134;480924 wrote:karen, what'd you make of Kelly's post game comments regarding Shoeloace?
To me, it seemed like Kelly realizes how "fragile" Shoelace seems to be, but was incredulous at the fact that his defense pounded Robinson time and time again and he kept just going.
Bucks fans, it's easy to say he won't hold up simply because he's skinny, but really, do Big Ten defenses hit any harder than any other defenses? Maybe OSU/Iowa, but as a whole, I'd say it's impossible to make a distinction.