C
Con_Alma
Posts: 12,198
Aug 24, 2010 11:54am
Steel Valley Football;460434 wrote:Look who decided to make an appearance. Nice response on the other thread.
Did I miss something???
Was there a question I didn't see?
C
Con_Alma
Posts: 12,198
Aug 24, 2010 11:58am
Isn't that what LJ said?Steel Valley Football;460441 wrote:Appraisers are not market makers (whatever that is). ...
Market makers keep financial markets efficient by quoting both buy and sell prices. They compete for these orders. They tend to deliver their own shares or equity to buyers then sometimes look for a "replacement type order" for their own inventory. It can lend to a more speedy market.
S
Steel Valley Football
Posts: 4,548
Aug 24, 2010 1:13pm
Con_Alma;460453 wrote:Isn't that what LJ said?
Market makers keep financial markets efficient by quoting both buy and sell prices. They compete for these orders. They tend to deliver their own shares or equity to buyers then sometimes look for a "replacement type order" for their own inventory. It can lend to a more speedy market.
Define who market makers are in real estate.
C
Con_Alma
Posts: 12,198
Aug 24, 2010 1:43pm
I personally can't.
How come you never answer my questions but expect me to not only answer yours but also "respond" to any comments you might make?
How come you never answer my questions but expect me to not only answer yours but also "respond" to any comments you might make?
ts1227
Posts: 12,319
Aug 24, 2010 1:51pm
http://www.ohiochatter.com/threads/15098-Market-Value-Appraisals-and-General-Real-Estate-Discussion/
If you post it there then 99% of the people on this site can avoid reading stuff we don't give a fuck about because it was posted on a random thread
If you post it there then 99% of the people on this site can avoid reading stuff we don't give a fuck about because it was posted on a random thread
S
Steel Valley Football
Posts: 4,548
Aug 24, 2010 3:21pm
ts1227;460576 wrote:http://www.ohiochatter.com/threads/15098-Market-Value-Appraisals-and-General-Real-Estate-Discussion/
If you post it there then 99% of the people on this site can avoid reading stuff we don't give a fuck about because it was posted on a random thread
How about fuck you; blow me?
S
Steel Valley Football
Posts: 4,548
Aug 24, 2010 3:24pm
Con_Alma;460566 wrote:I personally can't.
How come you never answer my questions but expect me to not only answer yours but also "respond" to any comments you might make?
I'll answer any question you ask that doesn't pertain to my reason for having this discussion, my motives, what I'm hoping for, etc. You're not the OC shrink...or are you?
thedynasty1998
Posts: 6,844
Aug 24, 2010 3:27pm
Steel Valley Football;460696 wrote:How about fuck you; blow me?
Mr. appraiser is real mature, apparently.
S
Steel Valley Football
Posts: 4,548
Aug 24, 2010 3:44pm
thedynasty1998;460707 wrote:Mr. appraiser is real mature, apparently.
Maybe you should weigh in with some real estate thoughts of your own. You are a licensed realtor, right?
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Aug 24, 2010 3:45pm
LMAO!!! I'm ready for some popcorn--how 'bout you,dynasty???
thedynasty1998
Posts: 6,844
Aug 24, 2010 4:17pm
Steel Valley Football;460724 wrote:Maybe you should weigh in with some real estate thoughts of your own. You are a licensed realtor, right?
I gave my thoughts on the original thread and admitted that I don't practice and it's not a real difficult test to pass, so I would hardly consider myself an expert. You asked me what I thought market value was, I gave you what I was taught and what was my understanding for the test and you said I was wrong.
S
Steel Valley Football
Posts: 4,548
Aug 24, 2010 4:37pm
thedynasty1998;460768 wrote:I gave my thoughts on the original thread and admitted that I don't practice and it's not a real difficult test to pass, so I would hardly consider myself an expert. You asked me what I thought market value was, I gave you what I was taught and what was my understanding for the test and you said I was wrong.
My point was that any original thought or idea, right or wrong, would be better than "oh your real mature" just because I used a swear word. I also don't think I ever said outright that you were wrong either.
S
Steel Valley Football
Posts: 4,548
Aug 24, 2010 9:38pm
How about you, LJ, since you said it? Please define who the market makers are in the real estate market.
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Aug 24, 2010 9:54pm
Steel Valley Football;461001 wrote:How about you, LJ, since you said it? Please define who the market makers are in the real estate market.
Large scale investors and developers.
justincredible
Posts: 32,056
Aug 24, 2010 9:56pm
I'm the market maker.
THE4RINGZ
Posts: 16,816
Aug 24, 2010 10:06pm
Who gives a fuck who makes the market. Houses sell for what a qualified buyer is willing to pay for them. Outside of that this whole argument is hyperbole
S
Steel Valley Football
Posts: 4,548
Aug 24, 2010 10:12pm
LJ;461016 wrote:Large scale investors and developers.
You mean developers like Dominion, M/I, Homewood, Maronda, etc?
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Aug 24, 2010 10:13pm
Steel Valley Football;461035 wrote:You mean developers like Dominion, M/I, Homewood, Maronda, etc?
in those specific markets. Then you have custom home developers like R&H, Silvestri, etc for different markets
S
Steel Valley Football
Posts: 4,548
Aug 24, 2010 10:19pm
justincredible;461020 wrote:I'm the market maker.
I'm your huckleberry.
S
Steel Valley Football
Posts: 4,548
Aug 24, 2010 10:20pm
Oops, that's way too big...like my penis.
S
Steel Valley Football
Posts: 4,548
Aug 24, 2010 11:04pm
LJ;461036 wrote:in those specific markets. Then you have custom home developers like R&H, Silvestri, etc for different markets
I disagree. They don't act as market makers in the traditional sense; not as I understand how market makers in securities work anyway. It's totally different. They may set their own prices, but those prices don't drive the existing home market prices.
More importantly, M/I,Dominion, Rockford and the like ruin almost every market they development in. Developers like those played a big part in the housing crash. Many custom builders who offer their own financing were and are still part of it too. I figured you knew about that.
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Aug 25, 2010 1:33am
Alrighty-o, then! While I'd hate to interrupt this riveting discussion of whatever the fuck insomnia cure you people are talking about, this thread is about Free Huddle. And since Free Huddle (the name) no longer exists as far as this site is concerned, it now shall be about Free Hat.
This is the movement that took place during a South Park episode to free baby-killer Hat McCullough...a movement that succeeded despite Hat being insane and likely killing a baby (off-screen) after being freed.
So, discuss: Was freeing Hat a good or bad decision?
This is the movement that took place during a South Park episode to free baby-killer Hat McCullough...a movement that succeeded despite Hat being insane and likely killing a baby (off-screen) after being freed.
So, discuss: Was freeing Hat a good or bad decision?
C
Con_Alma
Posts: 12,198
Aug 25, 2010 6:28am
Steel Valley Football;460702 wrote:I'll answer any question you ask that doesn't pertain to my reason for having this discussion, my motives, what I'm hoping for, etc. You're not the OC shrink...or are you?
...not the OC shrink. Why would you ask that when it doesn't have anything to do with the topic at hand and you just stated that you wouldn't answer any question that weren't directly related to them? That's a bit hypocritical don't you think?
Here's why I have asked certain question that may not be directly topic related.
I've only asked why to better understand how I might further add to this topic. I've given my opinion and yet you have called me names, been sarcastic and upset that I hadn't responded to your comments. If I better understood what it was you wanted I might better be able to go on with this obsession of a topic....then again maybe I wouldn't.
FatHobbit
Posts: 8,651
Aug 25, 2010 8:53am
I didn't see this specific episode, but I am opposed to freeing insane baby killers.Heretic;461146 wrote:This is the movement that took place during a South Park episode to free baby-killer Hat McCullough...a movement that succeeded despite Hat being insane and likely killing a baby (off-screen) after being freed.
So, discuss: Was freeing Hat a good or bad decision?
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Aug 25, 2010 1:54pm
FatHobbit;461203 wrote:I didn't see this specific episode, but I am opposed to freeing insane baby killers.
Well, when you phrase things that way, ANYTHING seems bad.
FREE HAT! FREE HAT!