LJ;458897 wrote:I never debated the meaning of market value?? Why do people keep making shit up about me trying to make me look bad? It's quite comical...

-Society-;458995 wrote:Are you really that stupid?

http://www.ohiochatter.com/threads/15098-Market-Value-Appraisals-and-General-Real-Estate-Discussion

Trueblue23;459021 wrote:LJ.

My advice to you.. if you really dislike Society so much, ignore him. If he responds to your post, simply don't read it. If you feel the need to read the post, laugh it off. Remember who is saying this stuff.

No need to get all fired up man.

Trueblue23;459026 wrote:You had me fooled.

LJ;459031 wrote:Didn't know you could tell tone on the internetz LOL. I post on here for fun, not to "prove anything" or to "make my life better". I sit in front of the tv and post when nothing is on and post when I am bored at the office. Nothing more. No one gets in arguments like this with me on any other forum, so obviously, something is amiss.

Trueblue23;459036 wrote:Yet you continue to bicker back and fourth with Society.. He's, in the words of Ben Affleck in Jay and Silent Bob.. "Someone you claim to despise, yet can't stop talking about".

Just a general observation, nothing personal man.

LJ;458997 wrote:Are you really that stupid? I was discussing the value of "market value" and how it is used as a business tool. I know exactly what the term means and never debated that.

Steel Valley Football;459106 wrote:Then why didn't ya hook me up and back me? That's what the debate was about. When you came in ya kinda put down appraising and didn't address the current definition. That's all. No hard feelings. I like your other posts on a regular basis.

Steel Valley Football;459719 wrote:Wow, LJ....your lack of a response certainly is telling. Maybe I had you pegged wrong after all.

LJ;459724 wrote:What reponse was there to be made? Everything about the issue is in the other thread. I thought mauve you were going to let your false callout die, but whatever.

Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G

Steel Valley Football;459794 wrote:False callout? WTF ever. You jumped in that thread and acted like a dick from get go. Maybe you just aren't as smart about real estate as you think you are. I remember you from JJs now that I think about it. You were acting like a KIA then too. Got news for ya tho buddy...

LJ;459795 wrote:I was acting like a Korean made car? I jumped in the thread and offered my educated opinion. You don't have to like it. I remember you too. I know plenty about development and pricing. That doesn't mean i have to agree with appraisers. I don't know why you think that appraisers know everything about real estate, when in reality they know one small portion of it, and that is using a business tool to provide a number to banks and insurance companies.

And it was a false callout. I never debated the meaning of market value. maybe you should go back and read the thread guy?

LJ;459797 wrote:i loved the bank appraiser that said a house we built was worth no more than $205k because the door was solid and the house next door (that sold for $235k) had a glass front door. We accepted a contract for $245k (cash) the next day.

LJ;459810 wrote:This is how I am picturing SVFB right now

Steel Valley Football;459826 wrote:My call out was why didn't you back me on the market value definition. Not whether or not you debated it. It's clear that I was right and that Con Alma's definition was referring to "fair value". My guess is you didn't back me because either you don't know...or you were taking his side by trying to put down appraisers. Well, I have no control over you having dealings with an incompetent appraiser. You're fool if you use that logic and apply it to the entire profession.

Steel Valley Football;459829 wrote:My guess is you're not presenting the whole story. In addition, the person who signed the contract likely paid over market value if they were identical houses, minus the door. What were his financing terms?