Channing Frye > Shaq?thedynasty1998 wrote: There was such a huge market for Jamison and Shaq huh? No one else even wanted Shaq. He got paid $20 million this year. They could have paid a free agent with some promise instead.
Jamison obviously didn't make a difference, so at this point, you would take that trade back if you had the option. I'd rather have the 30th pick, and get someone with some potential, than have Jamison who is going to get $28 million over the next two years.
How about not bringing in Shaq and signing someone like Channing Frye and paying him $2 million this year.
It's just common sense.
LOL
Seriously, the Cavs are WAY over the cap, they can't just sign free agents, do you not understand what a salary cap is? We only got Parker and Moon because we are allowed a MLE, and BLE, and we can sign veterans for the minimum, but we weren't going to get any marquee player and we didn't. Jamison is pretty damn good, he just wasn't the right piece, but you are oh so smart because hindsight is 20/20.