aaaand you missed the pointSportsAndLady;1787100 wrote:Lol guys when I say something illogical it's only to prove how illogical you are being!
/zwicklogic
/s&ldevoidoflogic
aaaand you missed the pointSportsAndLady;1787100 wrote:Lol guys when I say something illogical it's only to prove how illogical you are being!
/zwicklogic
I never said they didn't exist. I merely wanted you to show me how lazy people can become successful since you seem to think there's no correlation between wealth and work ethic. You do understand what correlation means right? Like the concept?ZWICK 4 PREZ;1787069 wrote:No ones doubting most are.. so your statistics say about 2 million people in America are millionaires through no work of their own. Sleeper thinks 2 million people don't exist.
and you do understand your strawman rebuttal has nothing to do with that statement rrfan made right?sleeper;1787121 wrote:I never said they didn't exist. I merely wanted you to show me how lazy people can become successful since you seem to think there's no correlation between wealth and work ethic. You do understand what correlation means right? Like the concept?
I didn't make an absolute statement, you did. Nice try though. The zwick deflection machine keeps pressing forward.ZWICK 4 PREZ;1787094 wrote:... that was the point.. to show your hypocrisy. It was fine to hound me about it, but you do the same lol.
Oh I did? do you know what an absolute statement is?like_that;1787136 wrote:I didn't make an absolute statement, you did. Nice try though. The zwick deflection machine keeps pressing forward.
Yes zwick, I do and I'm sure you know that.ZWICK 4 PREZ;1787161 wrote:Oh I did? do you know what an absolute statement is?
Nobody can see it, but I am obviously right. You guys just don't get it.SportsAndLady;1787100 wrote:Lol guys when I say something illogical it's only to prove how illogical you are being!
/zwicklogic
The only way I'd know that is if you were right. So either i'm to assume you don't know what one is, or you're a liar. Which is it?like_that;1787165 wrote:Yes zwick, I do and I'm sure you know that.
Is it really that hard for you to respond without trying to be a smug condescending libtard? Everyone, but you can see its a defense mechanism
That's actually pretty funny, and awesome.BR1986FB;1787219 wrote:If this has been posted previously, my apologies...scratch that, this is so awesome that it deserves posted again (would read again)....
http://louderwithcrowder.com/dear-men-who-vote-bernie-sanders-youre-wimpy-and-gross/#.VumoLMv2aUk
I don't mind the super delegates. During the convention they usually go with the nominee or whoever won their state. If Clinton has more overall delegates, they will go with her, if Bernie pulls out the miracle. they will flip to him. Same as in 08.like_that;1791454 wrote:I am not Bernie fan (obviously), but the fact he won Wyoming and Hillary still won the delegate count 11-7 is a complete joke. This is the same party that blames the right for voter disenfranchisement. Hypocrites at best. Bill Clinton is a super delegate. Enough said.
Banning fracking is dumb. But, that does not make him a commie. Sounds more dictator like to me. A commie would be in line with taking over the industry.QuakerOats;1791514 wrote:http://www.rigzone.com/news/article.asp?a_id=143943
He wants to ban fracking nationwide.
COMMUNIST.
Somebody, please stop the insanity ..........
Bush is the reason this is all in shambles anyways. Instead of backing Kasich who clearly is the best nominee, everyone got on the Bush/Rubio train, and frankly they just are not strong enough candidates to win a national election. Now they're toast and we're left to two crazy guys and a successful moderate governor. This is just awful to watchptown_trojans_1;1791533 wrote:I don't mind the super delegates. During the convention they usually go with the nominee or whoever won their state. If Clinton has more overall delegates, they will go with her, if Bernie pulls out the miracle. they will flip to him. Same as in 08.
They are not formally counted until the convention anyways. But, they are a way to ensure a radical candidate does not overtake the party, like Bernie or even Trump.
Interesting enough, Five Thirty Eight did a story last month saying Trump would have been easy to stop under the D rules, as Super Delegates would have kept Bush or Rubio in the race.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/donald-trump-would-be-easy-to-stop-under-democratic-rules/
Banning fracking is dumb. But, that does not make him a commie. Sounds more dictator like to me. A commie would be in line with taking over the industry.