On Nov 12, 2024:
posted by Ironman92Why won’t they vote?
I think their general consensus is "we're not voting our way out of this." They could be right, but one party is significantly ahead of the other in terms of favorability towards the industry so it's an easy choice for me. If I was a single-issue voter, bitcoin would be my single issue.
On Nov 11, 2024:
posted by Ironman92Wasn’t there a Rams or Cardinals big name that did the same?
I can't remember anyone specific, but I've seen quite a few guys from the league wearing bitcoin gear.
Here's a tweet from Russell Okung. @DovKleiman is a nerd.
I would say it definitely leans to the right, and the Republican party seems to have far more favorable policies towards it so far. There are no Liz Warren's and Brad Sherman's in the Republican party that I am aware of. And there are several vocal bitcoiners in the Republican party (Cynthia Lummis, Warren Davidson, etc).
But there are plenty of bitcoin owners on the left.
There are also a lot that are strict libertarian/anarchist that won't vote.
I was going to predict $100k by Christmas, but we might get there this week.
congrat is
~August 2025 would be the end of the current cycle if historical cycles repeat once again.
My reasonable price target for this cycle is now $150k. My unreasonable target is $290k. This is not financial advice.
posted by justincredibleDon’t sell yet.
I decided to hold
posted by brutus161I decided to hold
$85k. I don't think we're ready for what's going to happen this cycle.
On Nov 10, 2024:
Don’t sell yet.
The Jets reek.
On Nov 9, 2024:
I guess I'm just not opposed to finding out ways that some of these foods and chemicals affect our health. If we move to use natural food coloring in our Fruit Loops, I'm not going to be mad at it. If Kennedy campaigned with Kamala and they win, that issue isn't going to be within the top 30 problems I could have issue with.
Right now the FDA gets almost half of its funding from big pharma. I'm open to somebody explaining to me how that isn't a conflict of interest.
I'm also not going to be pissed if I never again see another big pharma ad while watching the Super Bowl.
Upon thinking about it, it's actually kind of surprising that these issues haven't been brought into focus before this year.
All I'm saying is that if our country can find a way to start cutting back on the amount of morbidly obese 7yr olds, we all win.
On Nov 8, 2024:
RFK in health and human services.
posted by ptown_trojans_1Saw Rubio as well as state. Also, Richard Grenell.
The Attorney General will be an interesting one as that is one where Trump says he wants way more influence on how the agency acts. One name I read was Mark Paoletta, who served in OMB under Trump.
Linda McMahon will probably be in there somewhere.
Some Treasury names are billionaires John Paulson or Scott Bessent. Jaime Dimon already said he won't serve.
Make Rubio the official "UFO revealer Guy". He and Nancy Mace (and her incredible rack)