While I disagree, I understand what you're saying. I must have misunderstood what you originally posted which is no surprise as I'm on the lower end of the smart scale.Lou Demas;1391907 wrote:Hasbeen, I think you either misread my of or I was unclear in what I was writing. I want it to be fair for both, if you have a rich kid who didn't have a history of an outburst or anything this nature , I would not put him out of districts either, unless he was my own kid, I'd pull him out myself because I know how much he has been given. However, if the rich gets to boot , where he lives is quite a different environment than a city kid in general. What I'm arguing is ther is more mitigating circumstances and they need to be taken into consideration for all kids rich and poor. When I first posted on this I was still pretty salty about someone calling Anthony a thug and I think my post reflect that, however I try to refine my post to make my stance on this clear and consistent. So, I will state it one more time. when a kid acts out in a tournament in this manner, early in the season,he is kick out of that tournament and the next tournament. I believe is inappropriate response. However if the kid has no history of this type of behavior before, I think it is excessive to kick him out of the tournament without looking at alternative ways to punish him. I was just talking to a high school football coach today he told me the only time I've ever given kids breaks when they've had this kind of behavior a problem,is at graduation time, I think the same kind of logic applies here.
And I agree with you about the 'thug' comment. Unnecessary and out of line. A statement more than likely made by someone who's never met the young man.