goosebumps wrote:
ytownfootball wrote:
The problem guys like Calloros and Pike have is they play in a 'system" oriented offense. Were it not for that guys like Case Keenum at Houston would have won it hands down.
Can you please show me a quarterback anywhere that doesn't play in a "system"?
sorry goosebumps, but I have to agree with ytown on this one. It isn't necessarily the system they play in that's the problem, the major problem is that type of "system" isn't used in the NFL. The "throw 55 passes a game" and never run the ball isn't going to get it as an NFL QB. Look at the quarterbacks from Texas Tech. Kliff Kingsbury, Sonny Cumbie, Graham Harrel...they've led the nation in passing almost every year for the last decade or so, and have you ever heard of ANY of them winning the heisman, OR starting in the NFL? To add to that, Timmy Chang, Omar Jacobs. and even a guy like Alex Smith/Case Keenum (soon to be). These guys are rarely ever under center, rarely have to read defenses, or check down, and rarely have to take set dropsteps, plant, and fire the ball. Thats GREAT in college and it will get you huge stats and win you a lot of games. But it doesn't prepare you for the NFL, nor does convince heisman voters that you should win, because they know you got to throw a shit ton of passes, mostly because your team has little to no balance and instead of trying to run the ball, these teams just say fuck it and throw every down. So it's like rewarding a guy from UC for not having a running game, while penalizing a guy from a team that has a running game for not throwing the ball near as many times, because he can actually turn around and hand it off some, and doesn't HAVE to throw every down. Heisman voters, and most knowledgeable college football fans realize this.