.....The problem in comparing Purdue 2010 with Cincinnati 2000 is that the selection committee didn't have a game to judge the Bearcats. How the Bearcats would fare without Martin was the subject of great discussion, according to NC State athletic director Lee Fowler, who was a member of the 2000 selection committee.
"We didn't get a chance to see how they'd play after [Martin] got hurt," Fowler said Thursday. "We were assuming it would affect that team. But we had a lot of discussion about it. We spent a whole day discussing it. Had there been games where they played without him we could have had a more realistic view. You knew they weren't the No. 1 team anymore. They didn't feel like No. 1 anymore. There was no way to tell how far they should drop [in the seed line] because we didn't see them play." .......
Huggins said the biggest difference between what Cincinnati had to deal with and what Purdue will face over the next three-plus weeks is style of play. Huggins, whose Mountaineers lost to Purdue on Jan. 1, said the Boilermakers run a motion offense and they won't have to change that system. But Huggins said the Bearcats ran everything through Martin and once he was out they had to change the way they played, leaning on guards Kenny Satterfield and Steve Logan.
"It obviously affected us more," Huggins said in comparing what a Hummel absence will mean to Boilermakers. "They won't change what they do but we had to change what we did drastically."
If Purdue were to win the Big Ten regular-season title and the conference tournament then rewarding the Boilermakers with a No. 1 seed would seem appropriate. If they slip up then there would be just cause to drop them down a peg or two.
The best-case scenario for the committee is it has time to gauge the Boilermakers. The committee didn't have that luxury with Cincinnati in 2000.
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/blog/_/name/katz_andy/id/4946278/how-purdue-fare-hummel