eersandbeers wrote:

Ghmothwdwhso wrote:
I think this guy left a few letters off the start of his user name. If they wanted to have children, bang someone from the opposite sex, that's why one has a stick and the other a hole.

Agreed. Get my beer and truck and we will go string up some of dem dere faggots.

Ghmothwdwhso wrote:

eersandbeers wrote:

Ghmothwdwhso wrote:
I think this guy left a few letters off the start of his user name. If they wanted to have children, bang someone from the opposite sex, that's why one has a stick and the other a hole.

Agreed. Get my beer and truck and we will go string up some of dem dere faggots.

I don't know why you edited your original reply, but that's up to you. I have no idea what you are talking about with trucks and faggots.

WTF? It's pretty simple, if you want offspring, procreate. If you are talking about adoption, go and adopt 20 or so of those kids that are in need. Don't come on here with your bleeding heart for everyone else, go and do something. How many kids have you adopted? Based upon your response, it's not enough, there are many more out there.

eersandbeers wrote:

Ghmothwdwhso wrote:

eersandbeers wrote:

Ghmothwdwhso wrote:
I think this guy left a few letters off the start of his user name. If they wanted to have children, bang someone from the opposite sex, that's why one has a stick and the other a hole.

Agreed. Get my beer and truck and we will go string up some of dem dere faggots.

I don't know why you edited your original reply, but that's up to you. I have no idea what you are talking about with trucks and faggots.

WTF? It's pretty simple, if you want offspring, procreate. If you are talking about adoption, go and adopt 20 or so of those kids that are in need. Don't come on here with your bleeding heart for everyone else, go and do something. How many kids have you adopted? Based upon your response, it's not enough, there are many more out there.

No, I didn't edit it.

I haven't adopted any as I don't want kids right now. However, there are a number of gay parents who want to adopt children and bring them into a loving home.

When's the next Westboro meeting?

Ghmothwdwhso wrote:

dwccrew wrote:

Big_Mirg_ZHS wrote:

Con_Alma wrote:

eersandbeers wrote: ....
Not supporting the right of gays to adopt children or marry like straights is discrimination based on sexual preference.

I don't support the the continued government sanctioning of marriage. As soon as we get them out of marriage it will end all of this nonsense.

The you REALLY are guilty of being a bigot. I dont think blondes should be able to marry cause who wants all these fari skinned people running around.

What he meant was the government shouldn't be involved in marriage of any type, straight or gay. Meaning there shouldn't be government sanctioned marriage. At least that is how I read it and I also agree with it. The government shouldn't say who and who can't get married.

hang_loose wrote: I don't know if I'd agree on it or not. I know a lot of people that don't care for gays because of their flamboyant attitude. Just because you're gay doesn't mean you have to prove it to the whole world. Or even announce it to the whole world.

I think it depends on the situation. If they have a normal reproductive system, then use it. If not, use the legal system.

Ghmothwdwhso wrote:
I think this guy left a few letters off the start of his user name. If they wanted to have children, bang someone from the opposite sex, that's why one has a stick and the other a hole.

These 2 posts display the ignorance of some. It is funny to me how SOME people that are anti-gay can't intelligently and eloquently put a rational and logical argument together about why they are against the idea of homosexuality. They just say mean and derogatory things.

Nice post. I'm not anti-gay, I'm pro normality, I think you are anti-heterosexual, so go get some counseling. Go adopt a kid that is in need before it's too late.

dwccrew wrote:

Ghmothwdwhso wrote:

dwccrew wrote:

Big_Mirg_ZHS wrote:

Con_Alma wrote:

eersandbeers wrote: ....
Not supporting the right of gays to adopt children or marry like straights is discrimination based on sexual preference.

I don't support the the continued government sanctioning of marriage. As soon as we get them out of marriage it will end all of this nonsense.

The you REALLY are guilty of being a bigot. I dont think blondes should be able to marry cause who wants all these fari skinned people running around.

What he meant was the government shouldn't be involved in marriage of any type, straight or gay. Meaning there shouldn't be government sanctioned marriage. At least that is how I read it and I also agree with it. The government shouldn't say who and who can't get married.

hang_loose wrote: I don't know if I'd agree on it or not. I know a lot of people that don't care for gays because of their flamboyant attitude. Just because you're gay doesn't mean you have to prove it to the whole world. Or even announce it to the whole world.

I think it depends on the situation. If they have a normal reproductive system, then use it. If not, use the legal system.

Ghmothwdwhso wrote:
I think this guy left a few letters off the start of his user name. If they wanted to have children, bang someone from the opposite sex, that's why one has a stick and the other a hole.

These 2 posts display the ignorance of some. It is funny to me how SOME people that are anti-gay can't intelligently and eloquently put a rational and logical argument together about why they are against the idea of homosexuality. They just say mean and derogatory things.

Nice post. I'm not anti-gay, I'm pro normality, I think you are anti-heterosexual, so go get some counseling. Go adopt a kid that is in need before it's too late.

Again showing your intellect. Being gay is normailty for individuals that are gay.

Not sure how I could be anti-heterosexual, considering the fact that I am heterosexual.

Not sure how you came up with that conclusion, please point out an anti-heterosexual comment by me. I'll be waiting.....

Ghmothwdwhso wrote:

I think this guy left a few letters off the start of his user name. If they wanted to have children, bang someone from the opposite sex, that's why one has a stick and the other a hole.

Ghmothwdwhso wrote:
You are anti-Hetero, on the same basis you called me anti-gay. What was the basis for that?

dwccrew wrote: Yes, there is plenty of gay couples that could provide a better and more loving home than some straight couples. Sexual orientation shouldn't have anything to do with someone's ability to raise a child. JMO

Ghmothwdwhso wrote:

dwccrew wrote: Yes, there is plenty of gay couples that could provide a better and more loving home than some straight couples. Sexual orientation shouldn't have anything to do with someone's ability to raise a child. JMO

Talk about ignorance, and arrogance.... who (is) these plenty of gay couples that can provide a "BETTER" home? What a fucked up and generalized comment against straight couples.

There, now you can stop waiting.

dwccrew wrote:

Ghmothwdwhso wrote:

dwccrew wrote: Yes, there is plenty of gay couples that could provide a better and more loving home than some straight couples. Sexual orientation shouldn't have anything to do with someone's ability to raise a child. JMO

Talk about ignorance, and arrogance.... who (is) these plenty of gay couples that can provide a "BETTER" home? What a fucked up and generalized comment against straight couples.

There, now you can stop waiting.

Where did I say all straight couples? I said SOME straight couples, you just decided to omit that? I never generalized, I stated that some gay couples could provide better and more loving homes than some straight couples. Try again.

Ghmothwdwhso wrote:

dwccrew wrote:

Ghmothwdwhso wrote:

dwccrew wrote: Yes, there is plenty of gay couples that could provide a better and more loving home than some straight couples. Sexual orientation shouldn't have anything to do with someone's ability to raise a child. JMO

Talk about ignorance, and arrogance.... who (is) these plenty of gay couples that can provide a "BETTER" home? What a fucked up and generalized comment against straight couples.

There, now you can stop waiting.

Where did I say all straight couples? I said SOME straight couples, you just decided to omit that? I never generalized, I stated that some gay couples could provide better and more loving homes than some straight couples. Try again.

Nice play on words. This isn't a game. Words mean something. You lose, on so many counts. Say it like it is, or don't say it at all. Go ahead and try to argue your point with someone else, I'm not buying your bullshit.

dwccrew wrote: Yes, there is plenty of gay couples that could provide a better and more loving home than some straight couples. Sexual orientation shouldn't have anything to do with someone's ability to raise a child. JMO

Ghmothwdwhso wrote:

dwccrew wrote:

Ghmothwdwhso wrote:

dwccrew wrote: Yes, there is plenty of gay couples that could provide a better and more loving home than some straight couples. Sexual orientation shouldn't have anything to do with someone's ability to raise a child. JMO

Talk about ignorance, and arrogance.... who (is) these plenty of gay couples that can provide a "BETTER" home? What a fucked up and generalized comment against straight couples.

There, now you can stop waiting.

Where did I say all straight couples? I said SOME straight couples, you just decided to omit that? I never generalized, I stated that some gay couples could provide better and more loving homes than some straight couples. Try again.

Nice play on words. This isn't a game. Words mean something. You lose, on so many counts. Say it like it is, or don't say it at all. Go ahead and try to argue your point with someone else, I'm not buying your bullshit.

Ghmothwdwhso wrote:

What a joke. You want everyone else to adopt, but you are not ready!! My guess is that you will never adopt a needy child, even when you are "ready" , who your heart bleeds so much for.

I don't know what your last sentence refers to so, no comment.

I'll let Al respond to that nonsense.

eersandbeers wrote:

Ghmothwdwhso wrote:

What a joke. You want everyone else to adopt, but you are not ready!! My guess is that you will never adopt a needy child, even when you are "ready" , who your heart bleeds so much for.

I don't know what your last sentence refers to so, no comment.

I'll let Al respond to that nonsense.

It appears your ability to follow the progression of a discussion does not exist.

I never said I want everyone else to adopt. I said there are gay parents out there who want to adopt.

Try to keep up with the discussion.

Upper90 wrote: LOL @ NCF bumping this to obviously spark something due to his.....ahem...."brother" getting banned due to the other thread about gays....and then deleting his post.

The Oh So Clever and Crafty Puppet Master.

Upper90 wrote: Yeah. Ok.

I mean, I could care less. But you and I both know that this thread was nowhere near the top of the page. And it just popped up, prior to royal k's post.

It's just not as clever when I'm sure I'm not the only one that saw you posted on it prior to deleting your post.

I'm not 100% sure on this, but I don't think many people posting here were born yesterday.

That said, I could be wrong referring to weareNC as your brother (or, "brother")....that's just something I took from conversation on another thread, so I can admit to possibly being incorrect there.