NFC Championship: (2) Minnesota Vikings at (1) New Orleans Saints

Pro Sports 467 replies 11,238 views
Non's avatar
Non
Posts: 9,517
Jan 24, 2010 8:09pm
Eric Frampton

came alive and forced the fumble
Non's avatar
Non
Posts: 9,517
Jan 24, 2010 8:11pm
fumble

Peterson loses it

Saints get it
UA5straightin2008's avatar
UA5straightin2008
Posts: 3,246
Jan 24, 2010 8:11pm
you have to be fuckin kidding me!!!
Mulva's avatar
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Jan 24, 2010 8:12pm
I can't see either of these teams hanging with the Colts.
LJ's avatar
LJ
Posts: 16,351
Jan 24, 2010 8:12pm
Peterson has the worst ball security in the NFL.
M
mhs95_06
Posts: 8,167
Jan 24, 2010 8:13pm
One turnover negates the other, still tied.
UA5straightin2008's avatar
UA5straightin2008
Posts: 3,246
Jan 24, 2010 8:15pm
LJ wrote: Peterson has the worst ball security in the NFL.
true that, gotta keep your eye on the ball son
B
baseballstud24
Posts: 547
Jan 24, 2010 8:15pm
What the hell kind of formation was that near the goal line? Line up Power I and pound it in...come away with a FG if nothing else!
Non's avatar
Non
Posts: 9,517
Jan 24, 2010 8:16pm
I see it like the 49ers-Chargers Super Bowl when Steve Young passed all over.

Manning will light it up and they'll be laughing and celebrating most of the fourth quarter.

40 something for the Colts

20 something for the other team
Azubuike24's avatar
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Jan 24, 2010 8:21pm
Anyone know who won the coin toss?
C
cats gone wild
Posts: 2,651
Jan 24, 2010 8:23pm
Saints start out with the ball second half. The Favre/AP fumble could be the deciding factor of the game.
UA5straightin2008's avatar
UA5straightin2008
Posts: 3,246
Jan 24, 2010 8:24pm
the saints will receive second half
tk421's avatar
tk421
Posts: 8,500
Jan 24, 2010 8:34pm
He didn't get the ball across. The Vikes could have challenged and would have won.
tk421's avatar
tk421
Posts: 8,500
Jan 24, 2010 8:37pm
Wow, Peterson fumbles again. Lucky Vikes got the ball back.
B
baseballstud24
Posts: 547
Jan 24, 2010 8:39pm
Peterson is horrible at protecting the ball
Non's avatar
Non
Posts: 9,517
Jan 24, 2010 8:39pm
nice catch

Shiancoe
Non's avatar
Non
Posts: 9,517
Jan 24, 2010 8:40pm
on 3rd and 2

that was something

TD Peterson
UA5straightin2008's avatar
UA5straightin2008
Posts: 3,246
Jan 24, 2010 8:40pm
back and forth!!
lets go vikes!
IggyPride00's avatar
IggyPride00
Posts: 6,482
Jan 24, 2010 8:41pm
Peterson is a bum right now, and can't be trusted to carry the ball right now.

A turnover would be a death sentence, and he clearly just can't get it done right now.

Taylor is more than adequate, you just can't risk it.
Non's avatar
Non
Posts: 9,517
Jan 24, 2010 8:41pm
21-21
F
Fabio
Posts: 547
Jan 24, 2010 8:42pm
IggyPride00 wrote: Peterson is a bum right now, and can't be trusted to carry the ball right now.

A turnover would be a death sentence, and he clearly just can't get it done right now.

Taylor is more than adequate, you just can't risk it.
As they said recently, Taylor was a 1000 yd back before Peterson got there, He'll do just fine.
Non's avatar
Non
Posts: 9,517
Jan 24, 2010 8:42pm
Colts are good at stripping the ball, too.

Peterson would have a tough time in that game.

He'd probably run over guys but then get chased down and have the ball knocked out
september63's avatar
september63
Posts: 5,789
Jan 24, 2010 8:42pm
baseballstud24 wrote: Peterson is horrible at protecting the ball
Jim Brown fumbled the ball 6.15 times per year during his career. I think AP will be Ok in the long run.
IggyPride00's avatar
IggyPride00
Posts: 6,482
Jan 24, 2010 8:43pm
As they said recently, Taylor was a 1000 yd back before Peterson got there, He'll do just fine.
I think the fumbles are a mental thing at this point, and I just can't imagine why you would tempt fate by continuing to run him when he has put it on the ground twice already today.
F
Fabio
Posts: 547
Jan 24, 2010 8:44pm
september63 wrote:
baseballstud24 wrote: Peterson is horrible at protecting the ball
Jim Brown fumbled the ball 6.15 times per year during his career. I think AP will be Ok in the long run.
Wow, I didn't know that. That's interesting.