ccrunner609 wrote:First off you could get a bowl win if ND wouldnt duck and cover and actually play a bowl. Second, is this so called talent there coming from those overhyped/mythical recruiting classes? Third, Crist is not at good as CLausen at this point and JC didnt win to many games.

LMAO.......more stupidity!

Heretic wrote: You forgot the drunken, sloppy make-up sex after the conclusion of the argument.

Well that was assumed...

Sept. 4 PURDUE ----------- Win
Sept. 11 MICHIGAN --------- Win, its a home game.
Sept. 18 at Michigan State ------- Loss- Usually play good at Sparty, but i'll shit if ND beats MSU twice in a row.
Sept. 25 STANFORD -------- Win- Call me crazy, but its in South Bend and Toby Gerhart won't be there to run all over the Irish.
Oct. 2 at Boston College --------- Win- I see it as a toss up, but I hate Fredo.
Oct. 9 PITTSBURGH ------- Loss
Oct. 16 WESTERN MICHIGAN-------- Win
Oct. 23 at Navy (E. Rutherford, NJ) ------- Win- kelly needs to right this situation.
Oct. 30 TULSA --------- Win
Nov. 13 UTAH ---------- Loss
Nov. 20 Army (at Bronx, NY)--------- Win
Nov. 27 at USC --------- Loss- Kiffen will screw that place up bad, but it will take about 2 years, and i just can't see ND going into LA and winning next year.

So I have 8-4, Some of the wins I have could go the other way, same with some of the losses, so I could see any where from 6-6 to 10-2, I'm going to be optimistic and go 8-4.

I see 7 wins on that schedule so I chose over.

ccrunner609 wrote:

sjmvsfscs08 wrote: I agree completely. I just want a quality bowl win.

People do need to understand 2010 was supposed to be Notre Dame's year. ccrunner is absolutely wrong in saying Notre Dame says the same thing every year. I have always said 2010 should be when Notre Dame makes a run for a championship (the difference is I was saying they could in 2009 because their schedule look so bad). Will that happen? Hell no. But my point is there is more talent and experience at Notre Dame right now than some people realize. I really think Notre Dame will turn some heads if Crist can play well.

First off you could get a bowl win if ND wouldnt duck and cover and actually play a bowl. Second, is this so called talent there coming from those overhyped/mythical recruiting classes? Third, Crist is not at good as CLausen at this point and JC didnt win to many games.

i would take the over only if nd had ohio st schedule lmfao, they have only 4 road games lmfao ohio st is more PATHETIC than nd lmfao

sleeper wrote:

sjmvsfscs08 wrote: I agree completely. I just want a quality bowl win.

People do need to understand 2010 was supposed to be Notre Dame's year. ccrunner is absolutely wrong in saying Notre Dame says the same thing every year. I have always said 2010 should be when Notre Dame makes a run for a championship (the difference is I was saying they could in 2009 because their schedule look so bad). Will that happen? Hell no. But my point is there is more talent and experience at Notre Dame right now than some people realize. I really think Notre Dame will turn some heads if Crist can play well.

When's the last time you've heard ND was suppose to have a down year?

2007. Said we were going to be horrible

grass_licker wrote: i would take the over only if nd had ohio st schedule lmfao, they have only 4 road games lmfao ohio st is more PATHETIC than nd lmfao

What?!

ass_licker wrote: i love how ohio st gets a bcs bowl every year by default cause of playing in the big 10, big 10 worst conference in football oregon 38 ohio st 17

lmfao