Ohio Chatter
Ohio Chatter

Forums

All Threads Serious Business Sports Politics Archive Pick 'ems Wordio
Log In Create Account

So...who does Tennessee target?

Home ▸ Archive ▸ College Sports ▸ So...who does Tennessee target?
R

rocket31

Senior Member

460 posts
Jan 13, 2010 2:43 AM
my vote is Mike Leach
Jan 12, 2010 9:43pm
Writerbuckeye's avatar

Writerbuckeye

Senior Member

4,745 posts
Jan 13, 2010 2:46 AM
Leach's style of play would not be successful in the SEC. Too much emphasis on offense, and not enough on defense. That works in the Big 12 (to a degree) but won't in power conferences.
Jan 12, 2010 9:46pm
R

rocket31

Senior Member

460 posts
Jan 13, 2010 2:47 AM
Writerbuckeye wrote: Leach's style of play would not be successful in the SEC. Too much emphasis on offense, and not enough on defense. That works in the Big 12 (to a degree) but won't in power conferences.
good point, however, i do not know if i agree or disagree, his "style" has never been attempted in the sec...
Jan 12, 2010 9:47pm
O

osu99

Senior Member

333 posts
Jan 13, 2010 2:52 AM
David Cutcliffe at Duke.
Jan 12, 2010 9:52pm
R

rock_knutne

Jan 13, 2010 2:55 AM
Leach makes sense.
Jan 12, 2010 9:55pm
I

ironman02

Senior Member

4,989 posts
Jan 13, 2010 2:57 AM
osu99 wrote: David Cutcliffe at Duke.
Good suggestion. I think this is very likely.
Jan 12, 2010 9:57pm
D

dat dude

Senior Member

1,564 posts
Jan 13, 2010 2:58 AM
osu99 wrote: David Cutcliffe at Duke.
Agreed. Makes sense.
Jan 12, 2010 9:58pm
NNN's avatar

NNN

Senior Member

902 posts
Jan 13, 2010 3:01 AM
Gary Patterson is what I'm hearing.

Cutcliffe is an outside possibility, but he'd have to retain a good chunk of (what remains of) the coaching staff. The man simply cannot recruit.
Jan 12, 2010 10:01pm
I

ironman02

Senior Member

4,989 posts
Jan 13, 2010 3:02 AM
Hmm. Patterson seems like a good choice. Very interesting.
Jan 12, 2010 10:02pm
ytownfootball's avatar

ytownfootball

Bold faced liar...

6,978 posts
Jan 13, 2010 3:05 AM
NNN,

We've butted heads a few times on here but you're the only UT fan I know of on here, I know you gotta be pissed, I kinda feel for ya, sorry man.
Jan 12, 2010 10:05pm
3reppom's avatar

3reppom

Senior Member

765 posts
Jan 13, 2010 3:50 AM
The best choice just stepped off the plane in Lubbock a couple of days ago.
Jan 12, 2010 10:50pm
Non's avatar

Non

Senior Member

9,517 posts
Jan 13, 2010 4:15 AM
Cutcliffe
Leach
Skip Holtz
Patterson

some good options
Jan 12, 2010 11:15pm
krambman's avatar

krambman

Senior Member

3,606 posts
Jan 13, 2010 4:18 AM
3reppom wrote: The best choice just stepped off the plane in Lubbock a couple of days ago.
Agreed. Tuberville would have been absolutely perfect for this job. To bad for Tennessee Texas Tech got him before the Seahawks got Carol.
Jan 12, 2010 11:18pm
R

rocket31

Senior Member

460 posts
Jan 13, 2010 4:22 AM
krambman wrote:
3reppom wrote: The best choice just stepped off the plane in Lubbock a couple of days ago.
Agreed. Tuberville would have been absolutely perfect for this job. To bad for Tennessee Texas Tech got him before the Seahawks got Carol.
fail. my sources inform me that tuberville has NOT signed the texas tech contract as of today.

apparently they can not sign the contract until the leach court settlement is over...
Jan 12, 2010 11:22pm
R

rocket31

Senior Member

460 posts
Jan 13, 2010 4:25 AM
muschamp looks to be the #1 choice though....

can tennessee take him away from texas?

hmmm
Jan 12, 2010 11:25pm
mucalum49's avatar

mucalum49

Senior Member

1,639 posts
Jan 13, 2010 4:26 AM
The UT scout board says Chris Petersen is coming in Thursday.
Jan 12, 2010 11:26pm
Z

ZeroCool

Senior Member

264 posts
Jan 13, 2010 4:28 AM
as a ut fan i would love to see charlie strong jump ship.
Jan 12, 2010 11:28pm
Azubuike24's avatar

Azubuike24

Senior Member

15,933 posts
Jan 13, 2010 4:33 AM
rocket31 wrote:
Writerbuckeye wrote: Leach's style of play would not be successful in the SEC. Too much emphasis on offense, and not enough on defense. That works in the Big 12 (to a degree) but won't in power conferences.
good point, however, i do not know if i agree or disagree, his "style" has never been attempted in the sec...
His style has been attempted in the SEC. He was the offensive coordinator under Hal Mumme at Kentucky and that is where he really developed his offense. It doesn't work in the SEC, not like in the Big 12. It really doesn't work there either, unless you are alright with maxing out at 10-2, 9-3 consistently. At Tennessee, that won't cut it.

I'm a big fan of Mike Leach, but he wouldn't be a home run hire in Knoxville. Well let me take that back, he might be a home run in terms of name and excitement, but the upside there is limited to a ceiling of remaining 4th fiddle to Alabama, Florida and LSU.
Jan 12, 2010 11:33pm
stroups's avatar

stroups

Senior Member

3,223 posts
Jan 13, 2010 4:39 AM
mucalum49 wrote: The UT scout board says Chris Petersen is coming in Thursday.
he would get my vote
Jan 12, 2010 11:39pm
ytownfootball's avatar

ytownfootball

Bold faced liar...

6,978 posts
Jan 13, 2010 4:45 AM
Azubuike24 wrote:
rocket31 wrote:
Writerbuckeye wrote: Leach's style of play would not be successful in the SEC. Too much emphasis on offense, and not enough on defense. That works in the Big 12 (to a degree) but won't in power conferences.
good point, however, i do not know if i agree or disagree, his "style" has never been attempted in the sec...
His style has been attempted in the SEC. He was the offensive coordinator under Hal Mumme at Kentucky and that is where he really developed his offense. It doesn't work in the SEC, not like in the Big 12. It really doesn't work there either, unless you are alright with maxing out at 10-2, 9-3 consistently. At Tennessee, that won't cut it.

I'm a big fan of Mike Leach, but he wouldn't be a home run hire in Knoxville. Well let me take that back, he might be a home run in terms of name and excitement, but the upside there is limited to a ceiling of remaining 4th fiddle to Alabama, Florida and LSU.
Agree with writer on the D aspect. Leach would be fine were he to put some kind of focus on defense which he has not shown much concern for. If anyone thinks he would be able to run that system in the SEC without a D they're in for a surprise. I think they'd be pretty pissed were he hired myself.
Jan 12, 2010 11:45pm
2quik4u's avatar

2quik4u

Senior Member

4,388 posts
Jan 13, 2010 4:50 AM
Jim Mora Jr
Jan 12, 2010 11:50pm
Azubuike24's avatar

Azubuike24

Senior Member

15,933 posts
Jan 13, 2010 4:51 AM
Here's the problem.

Leach's system can make up for some gaps in talent. However, in most of the years when he had inferior talent, he wasn't able to beat the very strong Oklahoma or Texas teams, and usually dropped a game to another conference opponent.

In the SEC, it's a given that the BEST he could do is match the talent on a given roster of LSU, Florida and Alabama maybe 1 in every 3 years, and he wouldn't consistently be ahead of teams like Auburn or Georgia year in and year out. Unlike the Big 12, where TT he could sometimes rank 3rd or 4th in talent, he wouldn't have that advantage very often. Even teams like Arkansas, Mississippi, South Carolina and now MSU and UK (with young new coaches) will still bring in top 30 classes.

Therefore, I think regardless, Leach wouldn't have the same advantage over the rest of the conference schools even with his crazy system. That's why I say that even though he might improve the league as a whole, I'm not sure running his system has the potential to be higher than a consistent top 20 team.
Jan 12, 2010 11:51pm
NNN's avatar

NNN

Senior Member

902 posts
Jan 13, 2010 4:58 AM
ytownfootball wrote: NNN,

We've butted heads a few times on here but you're the only UT fan I know of on here, I know you gotta be pissed, I kinda feel for ya, sorry man.
I appreciate it.

I'm one of the pragmatic ones who knew that Kiffin would have moved on to greener pastures within a six-year time frame. I wasn't expecting a one-year deal....I can't blame him one bit. I think what bothers me most is that fact that Fulmer's last few years is what has caused UT to plummet, and when there's a visible upturn it gets snatched away.

Here's my thinking on Fulmer. Can you name another guy who was head coach for 15 years at a premier program who has NO coaching tree?
Jan 12, 2010 11:58pm
2quik4u's avatar

2quik4u

Senior Member

4,388 posts
Jan 13, 2010 4:58 AM
Azubuike24 wrote: Here's the problem.

Leach's system can make up for some gaps in talent. However, in most of the years when he had inferior talent, he wasn't able to beat the very strong Oklahoma or Texas teams, and usually dropped a game to another conference opponent.

In the SEC, it's a given that the BEST he could do is match the talent on a given roster of LSU, Florida and Alabama maybe 1 in every 3 years, and he wouldn't consistently be ahead of teams like Auburn or Georgia year in and year out. Unlike the Big 12, where TT he could sometimes rank 3rd or 4th in talent, he wouldn't have that advantage very often. Even teams like Arkansas, Mississippi, South Carolina and now MSU and UK (with young new coaches) will still bring in top 30 classes.

Therefore, I think regardless, Leach wouldn't have the same advantage over the rest of the conference schools even with his crazy system. That's why I say that even though he might improve the league as a whole, I'm not sure running his system has the potential to be higher than a consistent top 20 team.
Leach also got most of his players from Texas to which next to Cally and Florida has the best talent in the country.
Jan 12, 2010 11:58pm
jordo212000's avatar

jordo212000

Senior Member

10,664 posts
Jan 13, 2010 4:58 AM
I really do not know where Tennessee goes from here
Jan 12, 2010 11:58pm