Based on what I saw, I think they would have.

I think that defensively Texas outplayed Bama. No reason to think that McCoy wouldn't have moved the ball better and not turned it over as much.

TolCentralCath wrote: No. Colt McCoy doesn't play defense and Texas' defense let up most of the points. A real national championship team can overcome situations like this.

LOL, riiiiiiiight.

Texas definitely wins with Colt in there the way Texas' O line played in pass protection for 57 minutes. Bama's D definitely was not the caliber of Nebraska's & Texas' O line got handled in that one. I would hardly blame Colt McCoy for all of the problems that Texas had against Nebraska.

Let's say with Colt in it is still 6-0 at the end of one. Are you telling me that Texas time of possession in the second qtr. is exactly the same? No way.

The Texas D is not on the field as long in the second qtr. and the score is much closer if not Texas actually having the lead. The Texas D played lights out the first, third & most of the fourth.

Bama's pathetic passing game keeps their scoring chances down & Texas runs away with the NC & the SEC gets embarrassed if McCoy plays IMO.

Hookem

2 to 1 in favor of Texas would have won. The ppl have spoken!!