51.6 PFF score on the season. Good enough for their "Bad" ranking.kizer permanente;1879356 wrote:Yeah he is and I'd still take him on this team. He'd be a 500% improvement over what we have.
Not to mention a) the Steelers have said they aren't giving up on him and b) he plays for the Steelers. The Browns and Steelers did business on the Justin Gilbert trade but I think the Browns would've taken a chewed piece of gum to get rid of that turd. If the Yinzers think Bryant has the slightest modicum of talent, they aren't trading him to someone within the division.Commander of Awesome;1879357 wrote:51.6 PFF score on the season. Good enough for their "Bad" ranking.
For comparison, Treggs has a score of 71.5, good enough for an Average ranking.
Right price huh? So you'll willing to make it worth their while for a guy who hasn't put together good tape in almost 2 seasons, benched by a SB contending team, is a mal content POS lockerroom cancer calling out teammates on social media (speaks volume to his maturity), and is one strike away from being banned from football. Holy fuck, I am so glad you're the not the GM.kizer permanente;1879359 wrote:Bryants rating this year has been attributed to Big Ben's inexplicable loss of his deep ball. I'm not worried about Bryant all of a sudden not being good anymore. I'll 100% take him. For the right price, Steelers will trade him, even to the Browns.
Lot of assumptions there SQ.kizer permanente;1879361 wrote:Well... that is how trades work, COA. Given his situation, the price isn't as high as his ability. Hence... trade for him.
Sorry, man....I'll take my chances on someone in the draft, with no past track record (arrests, etc) who is a top prospect versus giving up a (likely) high pick for a problem child who could be in Josh Gordon's shoes with one slip up.kizer permanente;1879361 wrote:Well... that is how trades work, COA. Given his situation, the price isn't as high as his ability. Hence... trade for him.
I mean that's an option. We just dont draft very well. Id rather have a couple guys Ive seen can play in the NFL, I guess.BR1986FB;1879364 wrote:Sorry, man....I'll take my chances on someone in the draft, with no past track record (arrests, etc) who is a top prospect versus giving up a (likely) high pick for a problem child who could be in Josh Gordon's shoes with one slip up.
I was discussing this with a couple of buddies (Luck, Aaron Rodgers, etc) and this comment is probably a "softball" for S&L, but the Colts & Packers, with the loss of Luck & Rodgers have essentially become a little more competitive version of the Browns. It magnifies the lack of talent (both have a few good WR's, defense sucks) both of those organizations (GB & Indy) have put around their QB's. The Browns are bad but these teams become Browns-like when they lose their superstar QB.like_that;1879369 wrote:Why is Hilton on the trade block? He is a good WR1 when Luck is actually out there healthy.
I hate this logic. "We have sucked at drafting, so might as well trade the picks." How about our fucking front office (or new FO), acts like a competent organization and drafts properly? It works for every other successful NFL franchise. The Browns don't have a draft pick problem, they have a scouting/evaluation/drafting problem. I don't know how you expect the same guys who can't evaluate talent to also properly make a trade for "talent."SQ;1879372 wrote:I mean that's an option. We just dont draft very well. Id rather have a couple guys Ive seen can play in the NFL, I guess.
Yeah, at some point, this dumbfuck owner is going to get it right and pick the right talent evaluators. Eventually they have to be a good franchise? Right?like_that;1879382 wrote:I hate this logic. "We have sucked at drafting, so might as well trade the picks." How about our fucking front office (or new FO), acts like a competent organization and drafts properly? It works for every other successful NFL franchise. The Browns don't have a draft pick problem, they have a scouting/evaluation/drafting problem. I don't know how you expect the same guys who can't evaluate talent to also properly make a trade for "talent."
Most franchises that dig themselves out of their pile of shit do so by drafting.BR1986FB;1879385 wrote:Yeah, at some point, this dumbfuck owner is going to get it right and pick the right talent evaluators. Eventually they have to be a good franchise? Right?
And I think that's the bill of goods Sashi & Company are trying to sell us but they haven't drafted well.like_that;1879386 wrote:Most franchises that dig themselves out of their pile of shit do so by drafting.
It's not a bill of goods or a secret. Successful NFL teams draft well, period. Sashi & CO have done half of the work (collecting picks), and they have failed completely so far with the other half.BR1986FB;1879387 wrote:And I think that's the bill of goods Sashi & Company are trying to sell us but they haven't drafted well.
Well, you did think at the time trading for T-rich was a good idea lol.Laley23;1879388 wrote:Hilton is not a pipe dream. He is on the block. The organization leaked it.
He is realy good, but Colts are in full rebuild (God that's pathetic...completely wasted Lucks prime). Hilton doesn't really fit in.
What does that matter? Virtually every Browns fan was pissed too.like_that;1879390 wrote:Well, you did think at the time trading for T-rich was a good idea lol.
They could have used that pick to shore up their offensive line.Laley23;1879392 wrote:What does that matter? Virtually every Browns fan was pissed too.
And I'm not the awful owner and GM making these shit decisions over the last nearly decade
I mean they could've used a plethora of picks to shore up the O-Line. They just never do it. Instead it's Moncrief, Dorsett, defense (which is fine). They took Castanzo who has been on and Kelly who jury still out. The rest they have tried to patch with late round selections and FA.like_that;1879393 wrote:They could have used that pick to shore up their offensive line.
I wasn't pissed about T-rich. I was happy to see the Browns geta 2nd chance after fucking up the previous draft with weeden and t-rich. The aftermath (Browns draft gilbert and manziel) is depressing though.
Overall I am just shocked how the Colts haven't taken advantage of Luck. I thought for sure they were going to be the next class of the AFC after that went on that run to the AFC championship.
My pipe dream comment was moreso that it would be great news if the browns got TY Hilton, and since the browns never have anything good happen to them, it’s a pipe dream.Laley23;1879388 wrote:Hilton is not a pipe dream. He is on the block. The organization leaked it.
He is realy good, but Colts are in full rebuild (God that's pathetic...completely wasted Lucks prime). Hilton doesn't really fit in.
Laley23;1879395 wrote:I mean they could've used a plethora of picks to shore up the O-Line. They just never do it. Instead it's Moncrief, Dorsett, defense (which is fine). They took Castanzo who has been on and Kelly who jury still out. The rest they have tried to patch with late round selections and FA.
And did anyone think they had fucked up with Richardson? He had a very solid rookie year (numbers wise, obviously advanced metrics and tape show differently in hindsight). Then traded him a few games into 2nd season. Almost everyone I knew was pissed the Browns traded their only playmaker.