BRF;1880860 wrote:Yet, we would have made the play offs without him.....yes?
He wants his pay off and yes he delivered. But in the end we come up empty handed.
I hate this jockeying around every fucking year.
Yes we make the playoffs without him but we don't win 22 in a row without him. He certainly wasn't the reason we lost in the playoffs and would have been one of the reasons we advanced had we moved on. He was always going to be a rental for the most part and he has no reason to take a discount to stay with us. Would love to have him.
BR1986FB;1880873 wrote:I'd move on. Not just because I can't stand it when he comes in but because he's going to be bringing diminishing returns soon. Hasn't he lead the league in appearances 2 out of the last 3 years or something? To compare this to football, it's like the Patriots when they know a guy is close to hitting the wall. Let him walk before he becomes your (expensive) problem.
Also agree with those on the Brantley comments. I would've let him walk too.
Bryan Shaw has appeared in at least 70 games every year since 2013. 80 in 2014 and 79 last year plus additional innings in the playoffs the last two years. I guess it all depends on what he wants. If he is expecting a 4 year deal, I could let him go. If he wants two years, I would say keep him. Guys like him, despite what you think of him, don't just grow on trees. He is 30 so he should have some good years left in him.
In regards to Brantley, I don't understand why you would let him walk? That money is one year money and isn't going to help that much in the grand scheme to sign somebody to a huge, long term deal. Pick up the option and hope he is healthy. When he is healthy, he is still great, as evidenced by his 1st half and All Star appearance last season.
There is nobody as good as healthy Michael Brantley who can be had for 12M for a season. Total bargain.