Impressed by Trump administration

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Politics ▸ Impressed by Trump administration
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Mar 9, 2017 5:59 PM
Until the number of people on welfare goes down I will take any unemployment figures with a grain of salt.
Mar 9, 2017 5:59pm
S

superman

Senior Member

3,582 posts
Mar 9, 2017 6:58 PM
Spock;1840706 wrote:yes

maybe the government will actually report the true numbers.
I think the government reports the true numbers. I think the media chooses which numbers to push based on who is in the White House.
Mar 9, 2017 6:58pm
B

BoatShoes

Senior Member

5,703 posts
Mar 9, 2017 8:43 PM
justincredible;1839582 wrote:I did see that Greenspan recently spoke up in favor of the gold standard.

George Mason has a great econ department. I enjoying following Walter Williams, Lawrence White and Donald Boudreaux on various channels. Who are the nobel winners?
George Mason also hired Scott Sumner who is about as anti-gold standard as it gets but a libertarian in every other respect. Basically the heir in monetary thinking to Milton Friedman IMHO. Would encourage all libertarians to read what he says. Argues persuasively IMHO that tight money leads people into voting for socialists or authoritarians.
Mar 9, 2017 8:43pm
B

BoatShoes

Senior Member

5,703 posts
Mar 9, 2017 8:49 PM
Spock;1840706 wrote:yes

maybe the government will actually report the true numbers.
How much do you want to bet drudge no longer has a link to the number of people not in the labor force in an article claiming catastrophe at cnsnews.com?

How much do you want to bet that CCRunner now thinks the reported unemployment rate is legit although the methodology and civil servants are the same?
Mar 9, 2017 8:49pm
B

BoatShoes

Senior Member

5,703 posts
Mar 9, 2017 8:51 PM
superman;1840730 wrote:I think the government reports the true numbers. I think the media chooses which numbers to push based on who is in the White House.
Yes. Vox will now talk about the labor force and Drudge will ignore it - The grand swap
Mar 9, 2017 8:51pm
fish82's avatar

fish82

Senior Member

4,111 posts
Mar 9, 2017 9:01 PM
It'll be funny to watch the scrambling by everyone to spin a 3.5% U3 rate.
Mar 9, 2017 9:01pm
salto's avatar

salto

Senior Member

2,611 posts
Mar 10, 2017 6:27 AM
The ceiling is the roof for Trump.
Mar 10, 2017 6:27am
B

BoatShoes

Senior Member

5,703 posts
Mar 10, 2017 9:46 AM
QuakerOats;1839279 wrote:If you think impoverishing future generations with trillions in debt makes sense, so be it. I think it is criminal. And when people say we can't change something, drastically, its because they are either lazy, stupid, or profiting from the status quo.
Obama and His Congresses doubled the amount of Treasuries in circulation. The Federal Reserve which is created by Congress removes them at will.

Explain concretely how all of this makes my daughter poorer when the GOP and Trump are planning to cut taxes - which if they are popular, will remain in place when she is older.

Moreover, if anything she has a future interest in treasuries as an asset as an heir.

Since WWII people have been saying we are stealing from future generations but taxes keep getting and our people keep getting richer importing the goods from poorer nations in exchange for treasuries.
Mar 10, 2017 9:46am
B

BoatShoes

Senior Member

5,703 posts
Mar 10, 2017 9:54 AM
Con_Alma;1839227 wrote:It wasn't that long ago that the US Navy was at pre-WWI levels and carrying out way more cruises. Fast, immediate deployment based on need was/is throttled significantly. It has since improved slightly but not nearly enough.

Meanwhile we have accelerating, unsustainable entitlement programs that aren't being addressed at all.
Medicare and Social Security are "sustainable" so long as there is an ample supply of doctor's and country kitchen buffets willing to accept U.S. Dollars as payment.

Same with military pensions which have no illusory trust fund.
Mar 10, 2017 9:54am
G

gut

Senior Member

15,058 posts
Mar 10, 2017 10:36 AM
BoatShoes;1840819 wrote:The Federal Reserve which is created by Congress removes them at will. .
You mean rolls them over? Outside of QE, the Fed has NOT monetized debt (QE did to the tune of about $3T) - otherwise the Fed is not just printing money and issuing a Treasury.

I think US treasuries are a horrible investment at these rates. It's mainly for institutions/countries that are highly risk averse and/or can only hold very liquid assets. For 99.9% of individual investors, they can get a superior risk-adjusted return with a diversified portfolio. The only individuals for whom treasuries make sense are very wealthy people who want to keep probably 3-5% of their portfolio very liquid.

All other individuals would do better to shop around for better yields on CD's, or an investment grade corporate bond fund. I have no idea why an individual would have bought a long-dated US treasury in the last 15-20 years.
Mar 10, 2017 10:36am
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
Mar 10, 2017 10:38 AM
BoatShoes;1840819 wrote:Obama and His Congresses doubled the amount of Treasuries in circulation. The Federal Reserve which is created by Congress removes them at will.

Explain concretely how all of this makes my daughter poorer when the GOP and Trump are planning to cut taxes - which if they are popular, will remain in place when she is older.

Moreover, if anything she has a future interest in treasuries as an asset as an heir.

Since WWII people have been saying we are stealing from future generations but taxes keep getting and our people keep getting richer importing the goods from poorer nations in exchange for treasuries.


There is nothing to be concerned with........................barring location of the Chardonnay bottle.
Mar 10, 2017 10:38am
C

Con_Alma

Senior Member

12,198 posts
Mar 15, 2017 10:15 AM
http://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2017/03/15/inconvenient_facts_about_defense_readiness_capacity_and_budget_110972.html

We are asking more from our military than we are providing resources for them to carry out such requests.

"...It can be useful to debate whether America should, over time, reduce its overseas engagements and commitments. But until that discussion and any resulting changes take place, we have to honor our existing obligations and ensure we have the ability to protect our interests in many areas at the same time. ..."
Mar 15, 2017 10:15am
Q

queencitybuckeye

Senior Member

7,117 posts
Mar 21, 2017 1:35 PM
Our next SCOTUS justice is an extremely impressive, smart man.
Mar 21, 2017 1:35pm
justincredible's avatar

justincredible

Nick Mangold

32,056 posts
Mar 21, 2017 1:39 PM
I do like Gorsuch a lot.
Mar 21, 2017 1:39pm
Q

QuakerOats

Senior Member

8,740 posts
Mar 21, 2017 1:42 PM
Sure seems to be. Hopefully his intelligence and respect for the constitution will rub off on a few of the other justices.
Mar 21, 2017 1:42pm
iclfan2's avatar

iclfan2

Reppin' the 330/216/843

6,360 posts
Mar 21, 2017 2:05 PM
His responses to Feinstein are gold. She's an idiot. He seems to be a straight up, letter of the law, constitutionalist. It's a shame they all aren't.

(Technically he is a constitutional originalist, which the interwebz says is "interpreting the Constitution as it was originally written, as well as a textualist, considering the exact wording of the law over its intent or consequences.")
Mar 21, 2017 2:05pm
ptown_trojans_1's avatar

ptown_trojans_1

Moderator

7,632 posts
Mar 21, 2017 2:08 PM
Yeah, he seems like a smart guy. He is a fine replacement for Scalia.
Mar 21, 2017 2:08pm
G

gut

Senior Member

15,058 posts
Mar 21, 2017 3:12 PM
Senator Klobuchar keeps trying to play "gotchya!" asking loaded questions, and then cutting off Gorsuch when he tries to provide context for his answer. She keeps getting this disgusted grin on her face like "how dare you deftly avoid my trap questons and keep me from falsely attributing your positions".
Mar 21, 2017 3:12pm
Q

queencitybuckeye

Senior Member

7,117 posts
Mar 21, 2017 3:56 PM
Whitehouse seems obsessed over "dark money". I'm pretty sure who that says the most about.
Mar 21, 2017 3:56pm
iclfan2's avatar

iclfan2

Reppin' the 330/216/843

6,360 posts
Mar 21, 2017 8:07 PM
ptown_trojans_1;1843131 wrote:Yeah, he seems like a smart guy. He is a fine replacement for Scalia.
He would be a fine replacement for anyone. Sotomayor is crazy and got on there, no one can be worse than her.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Mar 21, 2017 8:07pm
G

gut

Senior Member

15,058 posts
Mar 21, 2017 9:47 PM
iclfan2;1843208 wrote:Sotomayor is crazy and got on there, no one can be worse than her.
Ginsburg has become senile and seems to let her vagina do her thinking.
Mar 21, 2017 9:47pm
majorspark's avatar

majorspark

Senior Member

5,122 posts
Mar 22, 2017 12:27 AM
iclfan2;1843208 wrote:He would be a fine replacement for anyone.
No doubt at all that he would be a suitable replacement for anyone on SCOTUS. He looks solid and fair. He appears to be one who would rule according to the law even if it conflicted with his personal beliefs. I doubt all his rulings will please every conservative. I believe him when he says he will heavily weigh judicial precedent that he likely disagrees with. Not that he would never rule against precedence given arguments put before him. But fairly weigh it. These Senators humping judicial precedent would love to install judges ready and willing to manufacture ways to overturn it if it would fit their ideological beliefs.

He is a fine replacement for Scalia because he does not move the court to the right. A Judicial nominee of his intellectual caliber, common sense, and character replacing say Ginsburg, would bring a completely different narrative.
Mar 22, 2017 12:27am
S

superman

Senior Member

3,582 posts
Mar 22, 2017 7:10 AM
gut;1843226 wrote:Ginsburg has become senile and seems to let her vagina do her thinking.
If Hillary would have won, I think she would already retired. She is going to do everything she can to hang on 3 more years.
Mar 22, 2017 7:10am