sleeper;1837746 wrote:Nice opinion. So why is Trump using taxpayer dollars to go party in Mar-a-lago?
He doesn't party -- no drinking, no smoking, and no illegal drugs; unlike the prior prez (who was really cool).
sleeper;1837746 wrote:Nice opinion. So why is Trump using taxpayer dollars to go party in Mar-a-lago?
Yeah what I meant to say was:ptown_trojans_1;1837772 wrote:Nah man, you don't get it.
Obama=bad, evil and the devil while Trump=God, Jesus, can do no wrong.
You're losing it.ptown_trojans_1;1837772 wrote:Nah man, you don't get it.
Obama=bad, evil and the devil while Trump=God, Jesus, can do no wrong.
Thanks, but I'm not the one that believes 2-3M people illegally voted without actual evidence.QuakerOats;1837776 wrote:You're losing it.
But most of us are in favor of MAGA.
So, the use of taxpayer dollars for the president to take a vacation is cool unless he takes a pack of Marlboros or a bottle of Glenfiddich with him?QuakerOats;1837774 wrote:He doesn't party -- no drinking, no smoking, and no illegal drugs; unlike the prior prez (who was really cool).sleeper;1837746 wrote:Nice opinion. So why is Trump using taxpayer dollars to go party in Mar-a-lago?
Does he ever answer questions or keep repeating the Kool-Aid rhetoric over and over? Just asking because I've noticed a lot of one and little of the other, unless you count "posting news links (regardless of dubiousness) he agrees with, while saying anything he doesn't agree with is 'biased', 'wrong', 'fake' or whatever" as answering.O-Trap;1837781 wrote:So, the use of taxpayer dollars for the president to take a vacation is cool unless he takes a pack of Marlboros or a bottle of Glenfiddich with him?
If that's not what you're saying, then you didn't answer the question.
No, you were the one who was in favor of the Iran deal, yes? Because, and I'm loosely paraphrasing here, they were going to get what they wanted anyway?ptown_trojans_1;1837778 wrote:Thanks, but I'm not the one that believes 2-3M people illegally voted without actual evidence.
Lets hope not.gut;1837785 wrote:Petraeus as a potential NSA? Is this for real?!?!
So you were wrong in criticizing Obama for his vacations?QuakerOats;1837789 wrote:We pay to provide security for the president no matter where he is; always have.
Hope that helps.
It wouldn't surprise me. This administration is an absolute joke.gut;1837785 wrote:Petraeus as a potential NSA? Is this for real?!?!
gut;1837785 wrote:Petraeus as a potential NSA? Is this for real?!?!
He won't appoint Petreaus. I don't think he is that dumb. It will probably be General Kellogg. Plus, no way Petreaus gets a clearance....majorspark;1837787 wrote:Lets hope not.
I was largely in favor of the Iran deal because, it was technical in nature, but that is forced Iran to sign the IAEA Additional Protocol (something they resisted for years) and it shut down their plutonium research plant. It also capped them from producing uranium above 20% enrichment.CenterBHSFan;1837786 wrote:No, you were the one who was in favor of the Iran deal, yes? Because, and I'm loosely paraphrasing here, they were going to get what they wanted anyway?
But you are correct in the fact that you don't belive that millions carried out voter fraud; which is infinitely worse than topics pertaining to a nuclear Iran.
For the record, I'm waiting on the daily sideshow to end. So sick of this crap.
Good to know you were cool with Obama traveling as well.QuakerOats;1837789 wrote:We pay to provide security for the president no matter where he is; always have.
Hope that helps.
Trump didn't take the $400k annual salary but you're okay with him paying his own company MILLIONS of dollars for security at Trump Tower + his private club at Mar-a-lago?CenterBHSFan;1837794 wrote:I'm cool with Trump's wife and son staying in NY so that he can finish his school year. But after that, they need to either move to DC or have their comprehensive SS detail cut off. If they don't want to stay under the same roof, give them bedrooms in Blair House.
Agreed. That's why this strikes me as "fake news". Except with Trump anything is possible.ptown_trojans_1;1837793 wrote:Plus, no way Petreaus gets a clearance....
What? Calling the President a Fascist?gut;1837806 wrote:Agreed. That's why this strikes me as "fake news". Except with Trump anything is possible.
But also wouldn't surprise me if they are intentionally leaking BS so Trump can then go accuse the media of pushing "fake news". Certainly more than a few in the media are capable of being that easily played, especially when they let their partisanship bling their common sense.
The above is what disgusts me more than anything so far. Trump is not holding the media accountable - he's trying to discredit them. THAT is fascism.
Oh, he is def sending out trail balloons and stories that are no way going to happen.gut;1837806 wrote:Agreed. That's why this strikes me as "fake news". Except with Trump anything is possible.
But also wouldn't surprise me if they are intentionally leaking BS so Trump can then go accuse the media of pushing "fake news". Certainly more than a few in the media are capable of being that easily played, especially when they let their partisanship bling their common sense.
The above is what disgusts me more than anything so far. Trump is not holding the media accountable - he's trying to discredit them. THAT is fascism.
sleeper;1837795 wrote:Trump didn't take the $400k annual salary but you're okay with him paying his own company MILLIONS of dollars for security at Trump Tower + his private club at Mar-a-lago?
He's literally profiting from his Presidency. It's 100% unethical.
sleeper;1837791 wrote:So you were wrong in criticizing Obama for his vacations?
Well at least we agree on something.QuakerOats;1837813 wrote:Yes; I take it back.
Well, I guess you could say Trump is the most qualified guy to know what fake news is, since he spreads it with regularity!Automatik;1837938 wrote:Cries about fake news, spreads false information.
God bless America.