kayo;1793696 wrote:Can't believe no one has yet championed prosecuting people or companies that don't toe the line on climate change...

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/apr/17/democratic-ags-climate-change-groups-colluded-on-p/

Oh the liberals and their trial lawyers are teeing that one up right now; it will be a money grab that makes the tobacco settlements look like pocket change. Disgusting.

sleeper;1793643 wrote:The overwhelming amount of data and climate scientists disagree with you.

And yes I'm ignoring the painfully obvious irony of religious belief and this statement.

There are billions who disagree with you; they know the existence of the Lord in their lives and the guidance He provides.

QuakerOats;1793732 wrote:There are billions who disagree with you; they know the existence of the Lord in their lives and the guidance He provides.

They actually don't "know" anything. They are guessing based on no evidence.

What do you call the ridiculous guesses of human-induced climate change ........... science is not a (bought) consensus of opinion. Science is black and white fact.

Try again.........

QuakerOats;1793751 wrote:What do you call the ridiculous guesses of human-induced climate change ........... science is not a (bought) consensus of opinion. Science is black and white fact.

Try again.........

97% of climate scientists disagree with you and have the evidence to support their conclusion.

What do you call relying on one book to verify your entire life belief system? I know what I call it and it starts with either "S" or I".

The 97% myth has been completely crushed. I am shocked that even you went there. WOW

QuakerOats;1793773 wrote:The 97% myth has been completely crushed. I am shocked that even you went there. WOW

So just to be clear, you disagree with NASA and 200 leading scientific organizations. That's quite a claim.

ill just say this, to say we came from nothing is ignorant. there is obviously a higher power that put us on earth for some reason or another

I've found that debating the Climate Change faithful is about as useful, productive and enlightening as debating someone that the Earth is 6,000 years old.

The more horribly wrong the warming predictions go the more resolute the faithful become. The shakier and more uncertain the case becomes (were that possible, with respect to actual good science) the more dissenters are castigated as heretics, threatened with lawsuits and jail, and the debate declared "settled".

Yes, the comparisons to religion are just terribly unjustified.

[h=3]Judge: White House Showed “Bad Faith” In Open-Records Case.[/h]In what that Washington Times (5/9, Dinan) calls “yet another stinging rebuke to the administration for showing a lack of transparency,” US District Judge Amit Mehta in Washington ruled Monday that the White House “showed ‘bad faith’ in how it handled an open-records request for global warming data.” Mehta’s decision “granting legal ‘discovery’ in an open-records case” involves efforts by the Competitive Enterprise Institute “to force the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy to release documents backing up Director John C. Holdren’s finding that global warming was making winters colder.” Aides to Holdren “first claimed they couldn’t find many documents, then tried to hide their release, saying they were all internal or were similar to what was already public,” all of which “turned out not to be true,” the story says.



One wonders how long so many will be duped by the fraud and the cover up.

http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/nlifestyle/2016/05/10/environmentalist-weds-1000-year-old-tule-tree-in-south-mexico/?intcmp=hplnws



Enviro-whackos never cease to amaze ............