B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Feb 24, 2016 12:21pm
He can gain some weight. I think where he has an advantage over Wentz is his football acumen. I think Wentz has better physical tools but a lot of times that doesn't mean shit.Commander of Awesome;1783045 wrote:Yeah skinny knees. 2/10 would not draft

iclfan2
Posts: 6,360
Feb 24, 2016 12:54pm
From all I've heard, both wentz and goff would be below Marion's and Winston.
Also, take the best qb period. If you think wentz will be better but will take a couple years of fine tuning TAKE HIM. We aren't winning now anyway.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Also, take the best qb period. If you think wentz will be better but will take a couple years of fine tuning TAKE HIM. We aren't winning now anyway.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Feb 24, 2016 5:49pm
MKC reporting browns have made offer to schwartz, but thinks he'll hit the market SMH.
Also, Goff and Wentz next to each other. Get a sense in the size difference.
Also, Goff and Wentz next to each other. Get a sense in the size difference.

B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Feb 24, 2016 6:01pm
Heard Browns beat reporter Darryl Ruiter (92.3) reporting from the Combine that some of the local "buzz" is that there isn't a QB worthy of that #2 pick and Jackson made some kind of comment about "we're taking a QB in this draft, just may not be at #2." Obviously could be smoke.iclfan2;1783059 wrote:From all I've heard, both wentz and goff would be below Marion's and Winston.
Also, take the best qb period. If you think wentz will be better but will take a couple years of fine tuning TAKE HIM. We aren't winning now anyway.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Feb 24, 2016 6:02pm
And it sounds like Jackson's mindset is "we want them here but if they want to leave, leave."Commander of Awesome;1783088 wrote:MKC reporting browns have made offer to schwartz, but thinks he'll hit the market SMH.

like_that
Posts: 26,625
Feb 24, 2016 6:37pm
This fits Hits' approach of trying to trade down. Just two issues, who would do it and how far can you go without fucking over getting the guy you want?BR1986FB;1783091 wrote:Heard Browns beat reporter Darryl Ruiter (92.3) reporting from the Combine that some of the local "buzz" is that there isn't a QB worthy of that #2 pick and Jackson made some kind of comment about "we're taking a QB in this draft, just may not be at #2." Obviously could be smoke.
I still think there is about 97% we end up with Goff or Wentz after the #2 pick.

iclfan2
Posts: 6,360
Feb 24, 2016 7:04pm
Ruiter is a bit of a douche. And it doesn't matter if someone is "worthy" or not, we need one, period. My best friend is at the combine (and a well known, well respected draft analyst, and Browns fan), so I will see what he has to say after this week is up.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Feb 24, 2016 7:36pm
I agree with both counts. Think they will end up with a QB at 2. I'd be pissed if they took Bosa at 2 and ended up with someone like Hackenberg at 32.like_that;1783093 wrote:This fits Hits' approach of trying to trade down. Just two issues, who would do it and how far can you go without fucking over getting the guy you want?
I still think there is about 97% we end up with Goff or Wentz after the #2 pick.

Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Feb 24, 2016 9:24pm
Shouldn't trade down if they were still intent on taking a QB. All it does is risk not getting your guy when you are currently guaranteed to get him.

Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Feb 25, 2016 9:40am
Jared Goff: 6040, 215, 9 hand
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Feb 25, 2016 10:08am
Believe Jackson discussed hand size yesterday.

Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
Feb 25, 2016 11:47am
9 for the hands is better than I expected. Should be alright.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Feb 25, 2016 12:56pm
Who gives a shit about his hand size lol

Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Feb 25, 2016 1:01pm
That's one of those things that give scouting "gurus" chubbies, despite how there's probably no real evidence stating big hands are a necessity to throw a football.SportsAndLady;1783212 wrote:Who gives a shit about his hand size lol
http://deadspin.com/arkansas-qb-trying-to-stretch-his-lil-baby-hands-in-ord-1761240625
Hand size has long been a boogeyman of sorts when it comes to evaluating quarterbacks, the idea being that guys with smaller hands can’t grip the ball in cold weather or put as much zip on their passes. I have no idea of there’s any real empirical data to back this assumption up—Alex Smith, Tony Romo, and Michael Vick all had small hand measurements at their combines, for what’s it worth—but the ol’ gunslinger Brett Favre has huge hands, so that’s enough to get scouts all worked up about hand size.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Feb 25, 2016 1:01pm
Actually, you do. If a QB has baby hands they aren't going to have an easy time holding on to the ball and it's likely going to affect the way they throw.SportsAndLady;1783212 wrote:Who gives a shit about his hand size lol
Jay Stark, Two years working for an NFL team & 20 years working for the league.2.3k Views
An NFL football will measure 11" long with a 22" circumference at the midway point. Unless it is being used by the Patriots (joke Pats fans, joke), the air pressure should be between 12-1/2 psi and 13-1/2 psi.
A college ball (D1) will be just slightly smaller (1/2" in length and 1" circumference). While the NFL ball is only slightly larger, it still seems to play a part in the drafting of QBs. Hand size is scrutinized as much as anything. As we learned from the 'deflate-gate' issue, grip is very important.
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-the-football-used-in-college-football-games-and-the-ball-used-in-the-NFL

SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Feb 25, 2016 1:23pm
I get that it helps. But there are plenty of examples of successful NFL qbs with hands less than 9 inches.BR1986FB;1783215 wrote:Actually, you do. If a QB has baby hands they aren't going to have an easy time holding on to the ball and it's likely going to affect the way they throw.
Jay Stark, Two years working for an NFL team & 20 years working for the league.2.3k Views
An NFL football will measure 11" long with a 22" circumference at the midway point. Unless it is being used by the Patriots (joke Pats fans, joke), the air pressure should be between 12-1/2 psi and 13-1/2 psi.
A college ball (D1) will be just slightly smaller (1/2" in length and 1" circumference). While the NFL ball is only slightly larger, it still seems to play a part in the drafting of QBs. Hand size is scrutinized as much as anything. As we learned from the 'deflate-gate' issue, grip is very important.
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-the-football-used-in-college-football-games-and-the-ball-used-in-the-NFL
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
Feb 25, 2016 1:27pm
I swear the majority of teams would do better if the draft was held two weeks after the Super Bowl without all of the nonsense that has little or nothing to do with the main question: can this guy play?
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Feb 25, 2016 1:29pm
Yeah, I can see that. I'd rather not chance it though.SportsAndLady;1783220 wrote:I get that it helps. But there are plenty of examples of successful NFL qbs with hands less than 9 inches.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Feb 25, 2016 1:32pm
Duh? Why wouldn't they with the limited amount of talent on this squad?
From everything I've seen & heard, it looks like Gordon is in, pardon the expression, beast mode. Looks like he's in incredible shape & focused on returning.
https://www.yahoo.com/sports/news/browns-open-suspended-gordon-returning-team-181055385--nfl.html
From everything I've seen & heard, it looks like Gordon is in, pardon the expression, beast mode. Looks like he's in incredible shape & focused on returning.
https://www.yahoo.com/sports/news/browns-open-suspended-gordon-returning-team-181055385--nfl.html

Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Feb 25, 2016 1:52pm
There are? Can you name 3?SportsAndLady;1783220 wrote:I get that it helps. But there are plenty of examples of successful NFL qbs with hands less than 9 inches.

like_that
Posts: 26,625
Feb 25, 2016 2:33pm
Heretic already posted an article.Commander of Awesome;1783239 wrote:There are? Can you name 3?

like_that
Posts: 26,625
Feb 25, 2016 2:35pm
Gotta love how goodell is taking the full 60 days to make a decision on his reinstatement. He is such a piece of shit. I wasn't exactly going out on a limb, but I called this at the time that Gordon applied for reinstatement.BR1986FB;1783227 wrote:Duh? Why wouldn't they with the limited amount of talent on this squad?
From everything I've seen & heard, it looks like Gordon is in, pardon the expression, beast mode. Looks like he's in incredible shape & focused on returning.
https://www.yahoo.com/sports/news/browns-open-suspended-gordon-returning-team-181055385--nfl.html

Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Feb 25, 2016 2:35pm
And it listed Alex Smith, Tony Romo, and Michael Vick. Hardly a list of world beaters.like_that;1783261 wrote:Heretic already posted an article.
Smith is the definition of mediocre, Romo while good is a fumble machine (and hurt) and Mike Vick is probably the most athletic person to every play the position.

Iliketurtles
Posts: 8,191
Feb 25, 2016 3:16pm
LOLfail that you think Romo is a fumble machine. Maybe you should go do some research and not listen to whatever BSPN tells you. Here is a list of currently players and their fumbles. This is just for regular season as it was easier to do.Commander of Awesome;1783263 wrote:And it listed Alex Smith, Tony Romo, and Michael Vick. Hardly a list of world beaters.
Smith is the definition of mediocre, Romo while good is a fumble machine (and hurt) and Mike Vick is probably the most athletic person to every play the position.
GP | FUM | FUM/GM | |
DALTON | 77 | 20 | 0.2597 |
P MANNING | 266 | 75 | 0.2820 |
HASSELBECK | 209 | 67 | 0.3206 |
RYAN | 126 | 45 | 0.3571 |
NEWTON | 78 | 30 | 0.3846 |
PALMER | 160 | 65 | 0.4063 |
BREES | 217 | 90 | 0.4147 |
STAFFORD | 93 | 41 | 0.4409 |
BRADY | 225 | 100 | 0.4444 |
BIG BEN | 171 | 78 | 0.4561 |
ROMO | 133 | 61 | 0.4586 |
RODGERS | 126 | 58 | 0.4603 |
A SMITH | 126 | 60 | 0.4762 |
RIVERS | 164 | 82 | 0.5000 |
FITZPACKTRICK | 112 | 57 | 0.5089 |
WILSON | 64 | 33 | 0.5156 |
E MANNING | 185 | 96 | 0.5189 |
FLACCO | 122 | 66 | 0.5410 |
TANNEHILL | 64 | 36 | 0.5625 |
LUCK | 55 | 31 | 0.5636 |
CUTLER | 134 | 82 | 0.6119 |
VICK | 143 | 97 | 0.6783 |

DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Feb 25, 2016 3:30pm
LOLPWNFAILIliketurtles;1783272 wrote:LOLfail that you think Romo is a fumble machine. Maybe you should go do some research and not listen to whatever BSPN tells you. Here is a list of currently players and their fumbles. This is just for regular season as it was easier to do.
GP FUM FUM/GM DALTON 77 13 0.1688 P MANNING 266 47 0.1767 NEWTON 78 16 0.2051 HASSELBECK 209 47 0.2249 STAFFORD 93 24 0.2581 ROMO 149 39 0.2617 RYAN 126 33 0.2619 PALMER 160 48 0.3000 BIG BEN 171 52 0.3041 WILSON 64 20 0.3125 FITZPACKTRICK 112 36 0.3214 BRADY 225 74 0.3289 RIVERS 164 55 0.3354 BREES 217 73 0.3364 A SMITH 126 45 0.3571 TANNEHILL 64 23 0.3594 RODGERS 126 46 0.3651 FLACCO 122 46 0.3770 CUTLER 134 51 0.3806 E MANNING 185 72 0.3892 VICK 143 56 0.3916 LUCK 55 24 0.4364