SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Jan 9, 2017 7:46pm
I really hate when I say something on here, and then Classy says almost the exact same thing.
Really makes me question my existence.
Really makes me question my existence.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Jan 9, 2017 7:53pm
Same for Kessler, who had a better statistical season (8 game comparison). Dont see you beating the drum to keep him as QB going forward.SportsAndLady;1832042 wrote:It was also his rookie year.
I'd trade our entire trash roster for Carson Wentz.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Jan 9, 2017 8:01pm
Would love to keep Kessler, he'd make a great NFL backup for 10 years!Commander of Awesome;1832053 wrote:Same for Kessler, who had a better statistical season (8 game comparison). Dont see you beating the drum to keep him as QB going forward.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Jan 9, 2017 8:56pm
lolSportsAndLady;1832054 wrote:Would love to keep Kessler, he'd make a great NFL backup for 10 years!
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Jan 9, 2017 9:38pm
You need a QB in the NFL?!?!?!Classyposter58;1832048 wrote:Browns fans are so unbelievably dumb and this thread shows it. You. Need. A. Quarterback.
Cleveland in that division will never make the playoffs until it gets one. Look at Oakland, they get David Carr and the turnaround happened fast. Denver has pretty much everything back from a SB team yet because they had no QB they miss the postseason entirely
imex99
Posts: 4,927
Jan 10, 2017 12:23am
So, do they take Watson?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Jan 10, 2017 12:26am
Hope not.imex99;1832151 wrote:So, do they take Watson?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Does this mean that Clemson could beat the Browns? lolololol
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Jan 10, 2017 8:01am
I'd take Kizer over Watson--just seems to have more of an upsideimex99;1832151 wrote:So, do they take Watson?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Jan 10, 2017 8:17am
No thanks on Watson
Benny The Jet
Posts: 2,987
Jan 10, 2017 8:50am
This. The Watson you saw in the first half will most likely be the Watson you'll see in the NFL. Missing open open receivers and looking flustered.SportsAndLady;1832183 wrote:No thanks on Watson
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
Jan 10, 2017 9:09am
Watson was god awful against the blitz and always has been. his receivers bailed him out a lot the last 2 drives. No thanks. That's exactly why I'm high on Kizer. He has very good numbers against the blitz
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
Jan 10, 2017 9:15am
I'm actually hoping some dumbass team like the jets or niners take Watson in the top 5 and Kizer or trubisky falls in our lap at 12
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
iclfan2
Posts: 6,360
Jan 10, 2017 9:27am
Don't like Watson's size. Do not want.
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Jan 10, 2017 9:33am
Watson would be the pick if he comes with a side of Mike Williams and Everette to catch all his awful throws. He had like 5 on target throws all night.
Great college QB though
Great college QB though
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Jan 10, 2017 12:30pm
This, never impressed with him. Not to go all sleeper here, but I wouldn't take him in the 3rd round.Laley23;1832193 wrote:Watson would be the pick if he comes with a side of Mike Williams and Everette to catch all his awful throws. He had like 5 on target throws all night.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Jan 10, 2017 1:12pm
This is eerily similar to what I said when the Browns selected Manziel..."is Mike Evans coming with him?"Laley23;1832193 wrote:Watson would be the pick if he comes with a side of Mike Williams and Everette to catch all his awful throws. He had like 5 on target throws all night.
Great college QB though
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Jan 10, 2017 1:14pm
SportsAndLady;1832183 wrote:No thanks on Watson
Benny The Jet;1832187 wrote:This. The Watson you saw in the first half will most likely be the Watson you'll see in the NFL. Missing open open receivers and looking flustered.
Crimson streak;1832189 wrote:Watson was god awful against the blitz and always has been. his receivers bailed him out a lot the last 2 drives. No thanks. That's exactly why I'm high on Kizer. He has very good numbers against the blitz
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Crimson streak;1832191 wrote:I'm actually hoping some dumbass team like the jets or niners take Watson in the top 5 and Kizer or trubisky falls in our lap at 12
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
iclfan2;1832192 wrote:Don't like Watson's size. Do not want.
Laley23;1832193 wrote:Watson would be the pick if he comes with a side of Mike Williams and Everette to catch all his awful throws. He had like 5 on target throws all night.
Great college QB though
theseCommander of Awesome;1832212 wrote:This, never impressed with him. Not to go all sleeper here, but I wouldn't take him in the 3rd round.
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Jan 10, 2017 3:54pm
Watson's beat feature is his grit and toughness.....he'll probably last longer and be better than we expect....but he won't be a very good QB for long, if any. Great college QB
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Jan 10, 2017 5:40pm
Buddy just sent me this, it brings teh lulz
[video=youtube;f2GMcjNyAyI][/video]
#CroKno U A Bitch lol
[video=youtube;f2GMcjNyAyI][/video]
#CroKno U A Bitch lol
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
Jan 10, 2017 8:43pm
I forgot about that video, shit kills me every time lolCommander of Awesome;1832254 wrote:Buddy just sent me this, it brings teh lulz
[video=youtube;f2GMcjNyAyI][/video]
#CroKno U A Bitch lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
S
slingshot4ever
Posts: 4,085
Jan 10, 2017 10:26pm
Give me the UNC QB
Benny The Jet
Posts: 2,987
Jan 11, 2017 11:43am
Drafted in the 20's/2nd round? Sure. Or were you wanting to spend the 1st or 12th on him?slingshot4ever;1832278 wrote:Give me the UNC QB
S
Sonofanump
Jan 11, 2017 12:10pm
I'd be OK with that.Benny The Jet;1832341 wrote:12th on him?
Benny The Jet
Posts: 2,987
Jan 11, 2017 12:20pm
I really don't see 1 QB worth a 1st or 12th pick for. I'd solidify the lines first and foremost. You could put Rodgers behind our line and he'd look like crap. Just my opinion.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Jan 11, 2017 12:25pm
Hasn't Rodgers had a shitty line almost his entire career (outside of this year where they've been pretty good)? Including the year he won the super bowl?Benny The Jet;1832347 wrote:I really don't see 1 QB worth a 1st or 12th pick for. I'd solidify the lines first and foremost. You could put Rodgers behind our line and he'd look like crap. Just my opinion.
That's a pretty asinine comment. If we get an elite QB, we don't NEED a Dallas Cowboys line to do well.
However, if we get a Dallas Cowboys line, we still need a decent QB to do well.
I'll take the QB at 1 or 12.