I saw some change and his post game explained things well.SportsAndLady;1777800 wrote:It was his first game and I'm ALREADY seeing people say "see! Shouldn't have fired Blatt!" lol
Time will tell [emoji52]
I saw some change and his post game explained things well.SportsAndLady;1777800 wrote:It was his first game and I'm ALREADY seeing people say "see! Shouldn't have fired Blatt!" lol
His defense is the bigger problem. He just isn't athletic enough to match up with the players he will need to in the playoffs to take this team to the title.HighRoller74;1777777 wrote:Only player on the team to shoot 50% for the game.
I know you love your Hot Taeks, but if you actually watched the game you would know he was frozen out of the offense for the 2nd half.
Who will have guarding on Warriors and Spurs?Al Bundy;1777809 wrote:His defense is the bigger problem. He just isn't athletic enough to match up with the players he will need to in the playoffs to take this team to the title.
English?Ironman92;1777810 wrote:Who will have guarding on Warriors and Spurs?
Did Belly hack into your account?Ironman92;1777810 wrote:Who will have guarding on Warriors and Spurs?
never should have traded wiggins away for him...I hated that trade when it happenedSportsAndLady;1777783 wrote:Kevin Love sucks. Trade him
Yep.slingshot4ever;1777815 wrote:never should have traded wiggins away for him...I hated that trade when it happened
He won't be guarding anyone. That is the problem.Ironman92;1777814 wrote:Who will he be guarding on the Warriors or Spurs?
Yeah because that is SO different than you saying "trade Love he sucks" after every game. lolSportsAndLady;1777800 wrote:It was his first game and I'm ALREADY seeing people say "see! Shouldn't have fired Blatt!" lol
Woah, someone being rational. Reps.HighRoller74;1777777 wrote:Only player on the team to shoot 50% for the game.
I know you love your Hot Taeks, but if you actually watched the game you would know he was frozen out of the offense for the 2nd half.
I'm not saying Wiggins right now makes this team, but he doesn't make them worse. His upside is much higher than Love's, and he has a much better contract.HighRoller74;1777825 wrote:I can't help but laugh that you guys think that Wiggins would make this team any better. Another chucker on the wing, and the 4th worst defender in basketball, Sign me up!
I just disagree. Love brings absolutely nothing to the table when we play a team that is anything more than average. Why would you prefer that over a young wing player that has tremendous upside?HighRoller74;1777828 wrote:Contract only matters in terms of luxury tax. Cavs are over the cap, and have limited flexibility either way.
And if we kept everything the same, switching out Love for for Wiggins makes this team worse, much worse. I've explained my POV multiple times in this thread, and frankly don't feel like doing it again, and rehashing the same points.
I'd prefer not to waste the final 3 years or so of LBJ's prime waiting/hoping/wishing that Wiggins becomes something in this league. At this point, he's a net negative player. So put that on the Cavs, and we're doing worse. Not to mention TT would be our starting PF, providing next to nothing. Just like last night.SportsAndLady;1777834 wrote:I just disagree. Love brings absolutely nothing to the table when we play a team that is anything more than average. Why would you prefer that over a young wing player that has tremendous upside?
SportsAndLady;1777877 wrote:Lol waiting for Wiggins to become something? He's already a pretty good player. You can keep pointing to the +- stats and other metrics but if you watch the wolves play you can see he's going to be a special player and is a good player now. Come on man.