Archive Cleveland Browns Offseason Talk

hoops23

Posts: 15,696

Apr 4, 2010 11:28pm

Ohiochatter jokes:
1. Al Capone
2. NCF

congrats, you're in good company.

B

BR1986FB

Posts: 24,104

Apr 5, 2010 5:31am

Al Capone wrote: Good job Holmgren, the hero of Cleveland. You could've had McNabb but will settle for eek and meek. hahaha.

As Pittsburgh continues to wait to see if they even HAVE a legit starting QB this year...."therapist" continues to bide his time waiting to see if he's suspended.:rolleyes:

CCRolly

Posts: 786

Apr 5, 2010 7:24am

Wow, this guy's a total douche...

O

OhioStatePride2003

Posts: 686

Apr 5, 2010 10:39am

Al Capone wrote:
HighRoller74 wrote: Not getting McNabb was a good move for Cleveland.
I agree. Seneca Wallace is much better. The joke of an organization continues. LMFAO.:huh:

Big Gay Al speaks again! You laugh now, but you're going to wish you had a Jake Delhomme, or Donovan McNabb when your masturbation piece, aka Big Gay Ben, is suspended for some time this season. Who's going to take you to the top? Charlie Batch? Get the fuck outta here.

B

BR1986FB

Posts: 24,104

Apr 5, 2010 11:00am

OhioStatePride2003 wrote:
Al Capone wrote:
HighRoller74 wrote: Not getting McNabb was a good move for Cleveland.
I agree. Seneca Wallace is much better. The joke of an organization continues. LMFAO.:huh:
Big Gay Al speaks again! You laugh now, but you're going to wish you had a Jake Delhomme, or Donovan McNabb when your masturbation piece, aka Big Gay Ben, is suspended for some time this season. Who's going to take you to the top? Charlie Batch? Get the fuck outta here.

C'mon...didn't you know that Dennis Dixon is a future Hall of Famer in Capone's eyes? :rolleyes:

O

OhioStatePride2003

Posts: 686

Apr 5, 2010 11:05am

BR1986FB wrote:
OhioStatePride2003 wrote:
Al Capone wrote:
HighRoller74 wrote: Not getting McNabb was a good move for Cleveland.
I agree. Seneca Wallace is much better. The joke of an organization continues. LMFAO.:huh:
Big Gay Al speaks again! You laugh now, but you're going to wish you had a Jake Delhomme, or Donovan McNabb when your masturbation piece, aka Big Gay Ben, is suspended for some time this season. Who's going to take you to the top? Charlie Batch? Get the fuck outta here.
C'mon...didn't you know that Dennis Dixon is a future Hall of Famer in Capone's eyes? :rolleyes:

Ha. Well Dixon and Batch can battle it out in camp. Dixon is a future hall of famer? LMAO! The guy, who's last meaningful snap in college, was when he blew out his ACL? Taking Shitsburgh to the Top? HA!

B

BR1986FB

Posts: 24,104

Apr 5, 2010 11:11am

OhioStatePride2003 wrote:
BR1986FB wrote:
OhioStatePride2003 wrote:
Al Capone wrote:
HighRoller74 wrote: Not getting McNabb was a good move for Cleveland.
I agree. Seneca Wallace is much better. The joke of an organization continues. LMFAO.:huh:
Big Gay Al speaks again! You laugh now, but you're going to wish you had a Jake Delhomme, or Donovan McNabb when your masturbation piece, aka Big Gay Ben, is suspended for some time this season. Who's going to take you to the top? Charlie Batch? Get the fuck outta here.
C'mon...didn't you know that Dennis Dixon is a future Hall of Famer in Capone's eyes? :rolleyes:
Ha. Well Dixon and Batch can battle it out in camp. Dixon is a future hall of famer? LMAO! The guy, who's last meaningful snap in college, was when he blew out his ACL? Taking Shitsburgh to the Top? HA!

The "Hall of Famer" comment was said in jest and not a quote of his but he has mentioned that Dixon is better than any QB we have on the roster. Amazing that can be gleaned from his ONE game of experience in the NFL. :dodgy:

S

Sonofanump

Apr 5, 2010 12:04pm

I never thought that I would use the ignore feature, but it makes this thread so much easier to read.

B

BR1986FB

Posts: 24,104

Apr 5, 2010 12:16pm

I'm really starting to dislike the spot that we're drafting in.

mucalum49

Posts: 1,639

Apr 5, 2010 12:26pm

http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2010/04/cleveland_browns_new_possible.html

Any thoughts on Jared Odrick? Never heard of him but sounds like a promising prospect. Probably could be had a few spots later if we trade down.

royal_k

Posts: 4,423

Apr 5, 2010 12:26pm

BR1986FB wrote: I'm really starting to dislike the spot that we're drafting in.

Why's that?

We can go up or down. And I think we should get an impact player even if we stay at 7.

B

BR1986FB

Posts: 24,104

Apr 5, 2010 12:31pm

royal_k wrote:
BR1986FB wrote: I'm really starting to dislike the spot that we're drafting in.
Why's that?

We can go up or down. And I think we should get an impact player even if we stay at 7.

Because if we go UP, it's gonna cost a ton and I don't think we'll be able to move down.

I think the Skins are gonna screw us either way. If they don't take Berry at #4 (likely they take Okung), they will trade Jason Campbell to Buffalo, Oakland or Jax, which will likely screw us trading Clausen to one of them.

I just think that we may end up with a player that is a reach at #7.

THE4RINGZ

Posts: 16,816

Apr 5, 2010 12:36pm

Trading up seems out of the question. Trading down has to be a solid deal that really benefits the browns. Staying put and thaking the best player available at #7 seems like the most feasible option.

Again with this brand new management team we hacve no idea which way they will go. I guess that is what makes the draft exciting. I mean you wouldn't want to have the #1 overall pick would you, that takes some of the fun out of it.

royal_k

Posts: 4,423

Apr 5, 2010 12:42pm

I agree if Cambell is traded, that makes our options less for moving down. But he can only be traded to 1 team. If There is no way to get Berry, I'm hoping for Thomas. He may be a reach at 7. But some have him rated as high as Berry. Hopefully they get it right. I'm trusting.

royal_k

Posts: 4,423

Apr 5, 2010 12:51pm

What do you think about this guy?

http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2010/04/cleveland_browns_new_possible.html

B

BR1986FB

Posts: 24,104

Apr 5, 2010 12:54pm

Odrick is kind of a dark horse. The guy who did the mock that I posted the other day that had us taking Spiller at 7 and McCoy with our 2nd rounder did a mock a few weeks ago and had us taking Odrick at 7. Doesn't really excite me.

royal_k

Posts: 4,423

Apr 5, 2010 12:58pm

The thing I thought was funny was Grossi's source saying Ordrick would be a bigger impact player than Berry or Thomas.

B

Big Red Monster

Posts: 436

Apr 5, 2010 12:58pm

Detroit is talking about wanting to move out of the 2nd spot.

What would Cleveland have to give up to get that?

B

BR1986FB

Posts: 24,104

Apr 5, 2010 1:02pm

Big Red Monster wrote: Detroit is talking about wanting to move out of the 2nd spot.

What would Cleveland have to give up to get that?

Probably two 1sts and a 2nd, at least.

B

BR1986FB

Posts: 24,104

Apr 5, 2010 1:04pm

royal_k wrote: The thing I thought was funny was Grossi's source saying Ordrick would be a bigger impact player than Berry or Thomas.

I know they are two completely different players but when I think "Penn State" and "defensive line" I have these horrible Courtney Brown flashbacks. I know it's not fair to Odrick but it is what it is.

B

Big Red Monster

Posts: 436

Apr 5, 2010 1:04pm

That may be the only way to get Bradford because I still believe he will go to Washington.

royal_k

Posts: 4,423

Apr 5, 2010 1:04pm

BR1986FB wrote:
Big Red Monster wrote: Detroit is talking about wanting to move out of the 2nd spot.

What would Cleveland have to give up to get that?
Probably two 1sts and a 2nd, at least.

No player in this draft is worth that price.

B

BR1986FB

Posts: 24,104

Apr 5, 2010 1:05pm

Big Red Monster wrote: That may be the only way to get Bradford because I still believe he will go to Washington.

You think the Rams will pass on Bradford?

B

Big Red Monster

Posts: 436

Apr 5, 2010 1:07pm

I cant say that for sure, I should have said that if St Louis passes on him, he wont last past 4.

SportsAndLady

Posts: 35,632

Apr 5, 2010 1:08pm

No way does St Louis pass on Bradford.

With all their QB issues over the past few years, Bradford is the perfect choice for them.