S
Sonofanump
Sep 22, 2015 10:36pm
i can not see Weeden keeping the starting job once Cassel grasps the offense.
Uz2Bon36
Posts: 1,135
Sep 23, 2015 5:18am
If you needed a QB for a football team, would you take Tebow over rg3?SportsAndLady;1752533 wrote:He sucks. Admit you were wrong, Said.
A POS, OK. As in being wrong, you're wrong! RG3 can still be a good qb. Will he, is the question.like_that;1752537 wrote:This, just stfu Said. You went all in on RG3, thought you were funny with your trolling, now you are a POS that can't admit you were wrong.
You're an idiot if you disagree. He still has one of the best arms in the league. Like originally said, he sucks at reading defenses. Work on his fundamentals and he may still be good.
btw- Joe Theismann, Rex Grossman and Chris Carter agree with me.....
S
Sonofanump
Sep 23, 2015 8:37am
That is not a positive endorsement.Uz2Bon36;1752569 wrote:btw- Joe Theismann, ....
Iliketurtles
Posts: 8,191
Sep 23, 2015 9:07am
I'm just saying if they were going to bring someone in and the choice was between Tebow and RG3 I'd take Tebow. I think they both suck but at least I don't have to worry about Tebow getting injured.Uz2Bon36;1752530 wrote:Are you talking to fill an immediate hole in the lineup?
imo- RG3 can still throw the ball pretty damn well. Yes, he sucks at reading defenses but can learn and get better.
He's a project but still the tools are there.
The best possible guy would have been Kyle Orton but that bridge was burned. As for Cassel I hate giving up a draft pick for him as I don't think he will overtake Weeden. I don't think Weeden will be anything great but I do believe he will be better than he was in Cleveland.
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Sep 23, 2015 9:22am
If you already have a QB and are strictly going on value (and ignoring acquisition cost), it's RGIII and not close. The problem is, there are other barriers to getting RGIII. Tebow you could have for league minimum.
It's a whole different world if you're bringing RGIII in to actually start and you're having to pay with picks/payroll to obtain him.
It's a whole different world if you're bringing RGIII in to actually start and you're having to pay with picks/payroll to obtain him.
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Sep 23, 2015 11:50am
I'm not sure a statement has ever left more middle ground.Iliketurtles;1752586 wrote:I don't think Weeden will be anything great but I do believe he will be better than he was in Cleveland.
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Sep 23, 2015 11:53am
He going to be asked to run a team who will try to run the ball 75% of the time and run the play clock down on every play. I would agree, Dallas will not be as bad as people predict and they are still the favorites in a bad division, but man, they are going to play some boring ass games for the next 2 months.
Heretic
Posts: 18,820
Sep 23, 2015 12:32pm
That's like being a student and saying, I don't think I got an A on the test, but I do believe I got at least 10% of the questions right.Mulva;1752640 wrote:I'm not sure a statement has ever left more middle ground.
F
friendfromlowry
Posts: 6,239
Sep 23, 2015 4:11pm
Chancellor back with the Seahawks. Damn - I was hoping he'd wait until after the Bengals game.
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Sep 23, 2015 4:30pm
I think Dan Quinn leaving will keep the Seahawks D from ever being what it was. Good, yes. Good enough to be scared of them coming into Cincinnati? No way. Just look at Atlanta's defense and how it went from one of, if not the softest in the NFL, to actually looking decent (without a ton of talent).
F
friendfromlowry
Posts: 6,239
Sep 23, 2015 4:45pm
^^Definitely agree. He's a freak regardless of his coach though. Actually one of my favorite players to watch.
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Sep 23, 2015 4:46pm
On another note, over/under on how many rounds Pacman Jones and Steve Smith go this Sunday? Two of the biggest trash talkers ever in the NFL.
F
friendfromlowry
Posts: 6,239
Sep 23, 2015 4:51pm
Hopefully they punch each other unconscious. Hate both of them.
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Sep 27, 2015 1:17pm
Bengals luckier than hell. 2 dropped interceptions, 2 penalties to give them 1st downs, recovered fumble
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Sep 27, 2015 1:29pm
Weedenboys up 14-0 already
wildcats20
Posts: 27,794
Sep 27, 2015 1:31pm
Randle with 86 and 2 TDs already. But Weeden is playing well.
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Sep 27, 2015 1:56pm
21-7 Weedenboys
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Sep 27, 2015 1:57pm
Eagles handling the Jets in the first half
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Sep 27, 2015 2:06pm
Short passing galore but Weeden is 9/9 so far
Terry_Tate
Posts: 7,606
Sep 27, 2015 3:31pm
I'm late on posting about this but how anyone could say that Tyler Eifert non-TD should not have been a catch is beyond me. Took 3 or 4 steps, turned, extended the ball 3 feet over the goal line. That play should have been dead when the ball crossed the plane. Such an awful rule.
S
superman
Posts: 3,582
Sep 27, 2015 3:33pm
Officiating is so horrible in this game.Terry_Tate;1753407 wrote:I'm late on posting about this but how anyone could say that Tyler Eifert non-TD should not have been a catch is beyond me. Took 3 or 4 steps, turned, extended the ball 3 feet over the goal line. That play should have been dead when the ball crossed the plane. Such an awful rule.
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Sep 27, 2015 3:36pm
TD if it was a running play. It is dumb.Terry_Tate;1753407 wrote:I'm late on posting about this but how anyone could say that Tyler Eifert non-TD should not have been a catch is beyond me. Took 3 or 4 steps, turned, extended the ball 3 feet over the goal line. That play should have been dead when the ball crossed the plane. Such an awful rule.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Sep 27, 2015 4:10pm
lol Weeden on the 3rd and 1 was just hilarious.
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Sep 27, 2015 4:12pm
Flipper play?Commander of Awesome;1753429 wrote:lol Weeden on the 3rd and 1 was just hilarious.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Sep 27, 2015 4:13pm
The run for -4 ydsIronman92;1753431 wrote:Flipper play?