Archive 2015 Browns Offseason Thread

T

thavoice

Posts: 14,376

Dec 30, 2014 12:10pm

iclfan2;1690664 wrote:Grossi is a complete moron with 0 sources. Him and MKC need fired immediately.

Are we sure Grossi and Footwedge arent the same person?

se-alum

Posts: 13,948

Dec 30, 2014 12:12pm

SportsAndLady;1690599 wrote:Come on. Shaw should not be starting in the NFL. Nice team guy and probably a great backup to have. But if we are going into next year with him as starter we will be staring down the #1 overall pick in 2016.

I don't want Shaw or Manziel to be the starter for the Browns next year. However, it's obvious that Shaw was more prepared and capable than Manziel. If it comes down to those two guys, Manziel would have to make a HUGE leap to get passed shaw.

Commander of Awesome

Posts: 23,151

Dec 30, 2014 12:15pm

Wont be surprised to see Cousins in Cleveland.

like_that

Posts: 26,625

Dec 30, 2014 12:32pm

Commander of Awesome;1690669 wrote:Wont be surprised to see Cousins in Cleveland.

Me neither, I wonder if the redskins will be able to trade him. If not should be interesting to see if they cut him or keep him for competition against RG3. He already bitched he doesn't want to stay in Washington if there will be no QB competition.

Pick6

Posts: 14,946

Dec 30, 2014 4:33pm

Crimson streak;1690659 wrote:I think Gordon gets 1 more year. This offseason will be huge for him. He needs to stay out of trouble. Unless a team blows us away with a trade I believe he will be here next season

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

wouldnt mind it, but they better hope it works out. What little value he might have left will be gone if it doesn't.

no thanks on cousins either. He's a bum. Wouldn't be shocked to see it happen though.

Crimson streak

Posts: 9,002

Dec 30, 2014 4:49pm

I'd take cousins. If foles is available he would be my first choice

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

T

thavoice

Posts: 14,376

Dec 30, 2014 4:58pm

Crimson streak;1690659 wrote:I think Gordon gets 1 more year. This offseason will be huge for him. He needs to stay out of trouble. Unless a team blows us away with a trade I believe he will be here next season

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I imagine his name will be on the trade block all the way up through the draft next year.
No one will want to take him on until he gets through the offseason without any incidents.
I could see New England wanting him possibly especially after Brady restructured his deal.
The Browns cannot really cant get a whole lot out of him I dont think.

salto

Posts: 2,611

Dec 30, 2014 7:16pm

Crimson streak;1690397 wrote:Bradford would be very interesting though

For one or two games until he's on IR again. Dude is close to being done.

shook_17

Posts: 3,023

Dec 30, 2014 8:46pm

If we had to trade for Foles. What would you give up for him. 2nd?

Crimson streak

Posts: 9,002

Dec 30, 2014 9:13pm

shook_17;1690835 wrote:If we had to trade for Foles. What would you give up for him. 2nd?

I'd give up a 3rd. 2nd might be pushing it

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Rotinaj

Posts: 7,699

Dec 31, 2014 7:31am

Why would the Eagles trade Foles?

SportsAndLady

Posts: 35,632

Dec 31, 2014 9:24am

Saw a bleacher report (i know, I know..) mock draft that had the Browns taking Danny Shelton from Washington at 19 and DeVante Parker the WR from Louisville at 12.

Thoughts?

shook_17

Posts: 3,023

Dec 31, 2014 10:05am

Rotinaj;1690878 wrote:Why would the Eagles trade Foles?

Some of the report were out that chip Kelly wasn't sold on him and could be on his way out.

And if love Parker at 12. What Louisville game last night, Parker just looked so smooth and big along with catching the damn ball.

Commander of Awesome

Posts: 23,151

Dec 31, 2014 11:12am

SportsAndLady;1690896 wrote:Saw a bleacher report (i know, I know..) mock draft that had the Browns taking Danny Shelton from Washington at 19 and DeVante Parker the WR from Louisville at 12.

Thoughts?

Would love it. Shelton is a bad man, and an academic all American. So shouldn't have QQiwannaparty concerns.

We need a WR, I think Parker is 2md best one in the draft but still hate spending a 1st on one. Rather go olber/de

se-alum

Posts: 13,948

Dec 31, 2014 11:27am

I would like Vic Beasley and Shelton in the 1st round, and Rashad Green or Stefon Diggs in the 2nd.

Commander of Awesome

Posts: 23,151

Dec 31, 2014 11:42am

I haven;t watched much footage of Beasley yet, but I've read comparisons to Bruce Irvin which are slightly alarming.

SportsAndLady

Posts: 35,632

Dec 31, 2014 11:45am

se-alum;1690929 wrote:I would like Vic Beasley and Shelton in the 1st round, and Rashad Green or Stefon Diggs in the 2nd.

Diggs has bust written all over him.

se-alum

Posts: 13,948

Dec 31, 2014 11:50am

Commander of Awesome;1690934 wrote:I haven;t watched much footage of Beasley yet, but I've read comparisons to Bruce Irvin which are slightly alarming.

I'd much prefer Shane Ray, but doubt he drops to 12.

se-alum

Posts: 13,948

Dec 31, 2014 11:52am

SportsAndLady;1690936 wrote:Diggs has bust written all over him.

Based on durability?

lhslep134

Posts: 9,774

Dec 31, 2014 11:55am

SportsAndLady;1690936 wrote:Diggs has bust written all over him.

Agreed

SportsAndLady

Posts: 35,632

Dec 31, 2014 12:21pm

se-alum;1690941 wrote:Based on durability?

That and he has been all hype with not-so-great numbers to go along with it.

I mean he had 650 yards and 5 TDs this year and we are talking about taking him with a top pick? Huh?

Commander of Awesome

Posts: 23,151

Dec 31, 2014 12:24pm

SportsAndLady;1690968 wrote:That and he has been all hype with not-so-great numbers to go along with it.

I mean he had 650 yards and 5 TDs this year and we are talking about taking him with a top pick? Huh?

Could it be system? Like Calvin Johnson or demarius Thomas? Their numbers weren't great either coming out.

se-alum

Posts: 13,948

Dec 31, 2014 12:31pm

Commander of Awesome;1690971 wrote:Could it be system? Like Calvin Johnson or demarius Thomas? Their numbers weren't great either coming out.

Maryland's QB play was pretty suspect.

se-alum

Posts: 13,948

Dec 31, 2014 12:33pm

SportsAndLady;1690968 wrote:That and he has been all hype with not-so-great numbers to go along with it.

I mean he had 650 yards and 5 TDs this year and we are talking about taking him with a top pick? Huh?

He had about 800yds, and missed 3 games. I can see durability being an issue, but the kid is talented.

lhslep134

Posts: 9,774

Dec 31, 2014 12:38pm

se-alum;1690976 wrote: I can see durability being an issue, but the kid is talented.

You can see it? The dude already has shown durability issues.

That's my prob with him. I'm with you on how talented he is though.