I think we can all agree that MEN ARE PIGS!!!!!!!!!!

Can we get def leopard to give us his opinions

thavoice;1669542 wrote:I dont think he and that lady expected this backlash. I think they expected everyone to be as "outraged" as they were!

Whenever you put ANYTHING about a female on the internet, there are no doubt going to be comments about how she is unattractive, ugly, or that someone "would not bang." While they may not have expected the rape threats and the extremely negative criticism, they no doubt expected anonymous internet message board douches to make fun of whatever female they put in the video. I wouldn't want to put my own girlfriend/wife/sister through that. I'm sure the guy that made this is no different.

sherm03;1669569 wrote:Whenever you put ANYTHING about a female on the internet, there are no doubt going to be comments about how she is unattractive, ugly, or that someone "would not bang." While they may not have expected the rape threats and the extremely negative criticism, they no doubt expected anonymous internet message board douches to make fun of whatever female they put in the video. I wouldn't want to put my own girlfriend/wife/sister through that. I'm sure the guy that made this is no different.

Have the rape threats been verified by anyone outside that organization? Sounds like more made up garbage to get attention.

sherm03;1669534 wrote:http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/actress-who-highlighted-street-harassment-receives-rape-threats-online-9824803.html

but aren't there already women in this "non-profit organization" that could have done it?

O-Trap;1669277 wrote:Hell, I greet strangers all the time in passing, just to be cordial.

But I bet you don't walk beside them for 5 minutes on the same route.

The dude was doing that to intimidate.

BRF;1670124 wrote:But I bet you don't walk beside them for 5 minutes on the same route.

The dude was doing that to intimidate.

I wouldn't do it intentionally, no. However, it's hardly a stretch that they could have been headed in the same direction.

Reason for her to be cautious? Sure.

Substantiation that he was intentionally being creepy? Not really.

O-Trap;1670133 wrote:

Substantiation that he was intentionally being creepy? Not really.

I agree to disagree, then.

A gentleman would have walked a few steps behind or in front......because he could have surely outpaced her to get to his supposed destination.

BRF;1670136 wrote:I agree to disagree, then.

A gentleman would have walked a few steps behind or in front......because he could have surely outpaced her to get to his supposed destination.

Sure. However, if a person truly doesn't treat her differently because she's a woman, does he care enough to walk behind or in front of her?

IMHO, he was pissed that she wouldn't talk to him so he was "fixing" her by walking along side of her.

Intimidation.

Again, IMHO.

BRF;1670170 wrote:IMHO, he was pissed that she wouldn't talk to him so he was "fixing" her by walking along side of her.

Intimidation.

Again, IMHO.

That is entirely possible.