According to her family.pmoney25;1665954 wrote:Well apparently the nurse who came to Cleveland no longer has Ebola and no one else has been infected.
Agreed.pmoney25;1666027 wrote:Well the statement says Doctors and the cdc can no longer find traces of Ebola in her blood. They will keep her in the hospital for a little bit longer. I know drs and science can't always be trusted though.
The other nurse has been upgraded to good condition as well.
No one from Duncan's flight or his family has it and it seems no one else from the hospital does either.
Needless to say while Ebola is a bad disease. I don't think it will be a worldwide pandemic many seem to think.
No information will be released via CDC .... Keeping in the down low until Midterm Election is over.... that is as transparent America getsfish82;1666069 wrote:Agreed.
I just find it curious that this is coming from her family, and that there has been no official statement from the CDC on Vinson's status, given how high profile her case was.
Again, there's no way she'd be virus free that quickly, assuming she actually had it.
You just think that because the government told you that you don't. You're actually already dead.vdubb96;1666076 wrote:I still don't have Ebola, hope this helps.
Heretic;1666081 wrote:You just think that because the government told you that you don't. You're actually already dead.
Thanks Obama!
It's spiraling out of controlBelly35;1666266 wrote:CASE # 4
not yet but it could .....gut;1666302 wrote:It's spiraling out of control
Starting to get a little pissed that the rioting and looting haven't started yet, tbh.gut;1666302 wrote:It's spiraling out of control
| Breaking News | [h=2]Dallas nurse Nina Pham now Ebola-free, to be released from hospital, says NIH[/h] |
I'm thinking they may have caught it too late in Duncan. Plus, Pham had a bllod donation from the one doctor who beat it so that could be a factor?pmoney25;1666362 wrote:So the two people who caught Ebola in the US are fine. I also believe that other than Duncan, all who have been treated in the US who caught Ebola in Africa have survived.
Looks like another 2-3 weeks wait to see what happens with the NY doctor
Correct, excluding the newest case, 7 of 8 have survived. Nasty disease, but the difference in fatality rates here vs. 3rd world is incredible, but not particularly surprising.pmoney25;1666362 wrote:So the two people who caught Ebola in the US are fine. I also believe that other than Duncan, all who have been treated in the US who caught Ebola in Africa have survived.
They didnt treat him a well because he was black.BR1986FB;1666364 wrote:I'm thinking they may have caught it too late in Duncan. Plus, Pham had a bllod donation from the one doctor who beat it so that could be a factor?
Small sample size, but maybe it is being treated more successfully. Likely a bigger reason is most of the ill have been doctors/nurses treating it who have been on specific watch for symptoms and are being diagnosed/treated at basically the first sign of infection.queencitybuckeye;1666366 wrote:Correct, excluding the newest case, 7 of 8 have survived. Nasty disease, but the difference in fatality rates here vs. 3rd world is incredible, but not particularly surprising.
Don't doubt it, but to return your guarantee with one of my own, the mortality rate in your case would still be lower here. A lot lower.gut;1666381 wrote:Small sample size, but maybe it is being treated more successfully. Likely a bigger reason is most of the ill have been doctors/nurses treating it who have been on specific watch for symptoms and are being diagnosed/treated at basically the first sign of infection.
Take an average person who doesn't have reason to think it isn't the flu, and who waits 2-3 days before going to the hospital and I guarantee the survival rate drops significantly.
And in hindsight, if they had to do it again, those who married her would opt for the Ebola.queencitybuckeye;1666383 wrote: Stat of the day: More Americans have married Kim Kardashian than have died from Ebola.
lol, so true.BR1986FB;1666390 wrote:And in hindsight, if they had to do it again, those who married her would opt for the Ebola.
Lower, no idea if it would be significantly lower. Treatment efficacy is most likely directly related to how soon you get treatment. The protocol is probably the same - these doctors going overseas to help aren't using salt and vinegar, they're taking the same antibiotics with them and IV's that you'd get here. They don't go over empty-handed to treat the sick.queencitybuckeye;1666383 wrote:Don't doubt it, but to return your guarantee with one of my own, the mortality rate in your case would still be lower here. A lot lower.