It's pissing into a cup 75 times.SportsAndLady;1659317 wrote:Go ahead and believe that all you want. 75+ drug tests in a year is crazy, I don't care who you are. We don't have convicted felons getting drug tested that many times.
Convicted felons don't have the privelege of playing in the NFL. It may be what some consider "excessive" but if the idiot weren't a repeat offender, he wouldn't be pissing in a cup every time he takes a breath.SportsAndLady;1659317 wrote:Go ahead and believe that all you want. 75+ drug tests in a year is crazy, I don't care who you are. We don't have convicted felons getting drug tested that many times.
Because the holes West ran through weren't going to be there for Tate? I bet Tate doesn't lose 8 yards on a run after a 60 yard pass when you're trying to put a team away. I bet Tate lines up correctly when you're trying to get s first down. The Browns have a great problem and typical Cleveland fan doesn't know how to handle it.SportsAndLady;1659274 wrote:How do you know they're better with Tate? He has 6 carries lol he's basically played half a game. A half where we got blown the fuck out. Then he was replaced and the team came back lol
Oppose to the non-typical cleveland fan (you), who wants to trade a productive rookie after 3 games? LOL.bases_loaded;1659337 wrote:The Browns have a great problem and typical Cleveland fan doesn't know how to handle it.
Sure they do just ask Michael Vick.BR1986FB;1659324 wrote:Convicted felons don't have the privelege of playing in the NFL. It may be what some consider "excessive" but if the idiot weren't a repeat offender, he wouldn't be pissing in a cup every time he takes a breath.
You wouldn't kick the tires on a trade with the Panthers? They can't even get Fozzy Whitaker to suit up for them. You have 3 capable backs. The lifespan of an NFL RB is what...2 years? Why not try to trade rape a team that is supposed to contend this year when you have an abundance at a position they need?like_that;1659343 wrote:Oppose to the non-typical cleveland fan (you), who wants to trade a productive rookie after 3 games? LOL.
I want Tate to be the starter and prove to be worthy of it as well. But, you even have to admit in some of his soundbites he seems very bitter and upset at the success the rookies are having while he has been out.bases_loaded;1659337 wrote:Because the holes West ran through weren't going to be there for Tate? I bet Tate doesn't lose 8 yards on a run after a 60 yard pass when you're trying to put a team away. I bet Tate lines up correctly when you're trying to get s first down. The Browns have a great problem and typical Cleveland fan doesn't know how to handle it.
Footwedge;1659352 wrote:Trade any one of the backs to the Colts for their number one pick.
The rumor, which has been squashed, was the Browns sending Crowell to the Tits for Hunter.bases_loaded;1659365 wrote: Anyone have any idea why the reporter asked Pettine about a Justin Hunter trade and who would the Browns be sending them?
He's embraced the city well, and become a fan favorite in some circumstances, but he's come across as a bitter bitch in several interviews. When he first arrived, he was asked on the radio about his thoughts on Matt Schaub (rumors were floating around that Schaub could end up in Cleveland) and his response sounded like some catty teenage girl.Laley23;1659366 wrote:I want Tate to be the starter and prove to be worthy of it as well. But, you even have to admit in some of his soundbites he seems very bitter and upset at the success the rookies are having while he has been out.
Good point on Vick. Forgot about that POS.Iliketurtles;1659360 wrote:Sure they do just ask Michael Vick.
But I do agree that Gordon just need to be quiet and suck it up and take the tests. He has no one else to blame but himself.
Meh...I would send the colts 4th to them.BR1986FB;1659378 wrote:The rumor, which has been squashed, was the Browns sending Crowell to the Tits for Hunter.
No.bases_loaded;1659365 wrote:You wouldn't kick the tires on a trade with the Panthers? They can't even get Fozzy Whitaker to suit up for them. You have 3 capable backs. The lifespan of an NFL RB is what...2 years? Why not try to trade rape a team that is supposed to contend this year when you have an abundance at a position they need?
Anyone have any idea why the reporter asked Pettine about a Justin Hunter trade and who would the Browns be sending them?
And I'm not so sure that Tate is actually much better than these two rookies. Crowell runs in a pretty special way. I don't part with that guy just yet.like_that;1659407 wrote:No.
You're not going to get anything more than a 3rd rd pick, and any team that is willing to give up a third round pick for another 3rd round rb who only played 3 games is very dumb. Not worth it. I rather keep the two rookies who are on a longer/cheaper contract (as long as they keep showing signs they can play in the NFL) and trade the vet after this season if we are going to trade anybody. RBs are dime a dozen in the NFL, but if you find good RBs for cheap, you might as well keep them.
Nah. OIf a bye week..this is an easy win for the browns.DeyDurkie5;1659679 wrote:I'm not. The browns will lose. Book it.
Just like Tampa at home?thavoice;1659684 wrote:Nah. OIf a bye week..this is an easy win for the browns.
I will take that bet.......like_that;1659722 wrote:Pitt will beat the jags by 50+.
/obviousthavoicereversejinxderp
