T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
Dec 12, 2014 12:33pm
REad about taht yesterday. Dick move, for sure, but who the fuck posts enough info on facebook that would be needed to get this cancelled?BR1986FB;1685489 wrote:The part that surprised me is that there are actually Jaguars fans....
http://deadspin.com/dickhead-jaguars-fan-cancels-texans-fans-plane-tickets-1670307120?utm_campaign=socialflow_deadspin_facebook&utm_source=deadspin_facebook&utm_medium=socialflow
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1da73/1da730efff03326445fb35ac5166005cbb876f87" alt="like_that's avatar"
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Dec 12, 2014 1:12pm
I would do it to a steelers fan. Fuck them.
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Dec 12, 2014 1:13pm
Dumbassesthavoice;1685496 wrote:but who the fuck posts enough info on facebook that would be needed to get this cancelled?
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Dec 12, 2014 1:17pm
I could see one of their fans booking a flight to Cleveland for a Steelers/Browns game.like_that;1685501 wrote:I would do it to a steelers fan. Fuck them.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da226/da226623a910db13449c264ab3d953bffc68537e" alt="Ironman92's avatar"
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Dec 12, 2014 10:35pm
Darren Sharper in a bit of trouble
http://m.espn.go.com/nfl/story?storyId=12019685&src=desktop&rand=ref~%7B%22ref%22%3A%22http%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2FkC0GPwjyJi%22%7D
http://m.espn.go.com/nfl/story?storyId=12019685&src=desktop&rand=ref~%7B%22ref%22%3A%22http%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2FkC0GPwjyJi%22%7D
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da226/da226623a910db13449c264ab3d953bffc68537e" alt="Ironman92's avatar"
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Dec 14, 2014 12:44pm
AFC will have some of those WC teams eliminated for the most part today.
A lot of tough games for many 7-6 teams and Steelers/Ravens have easy looking games (but NFL)
Bills, Dolphins, Chiefs, Browns, Texans all must wins
A lot of tough games for many 7-6 teams and Steelers/Ravens have easy looking games (but NFL)
Bills, Dolphins, Chiefs, Browns, Texans all must wins
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04070/040706bb489394922a49b721280970518891060e" alt="gerb131's avatar"
gerb131
Posts: 9,932
Dec 14, 2014 2:05pm
Jags just took lead on Baltimore
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da226/da226623a910db13449c264ab3d953bffc68537e" alt="Ironman92's avatar"
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Dec 14, 2014 2:27pm
We both know better thoughgerb131;1685954 wrote:Jags just took lead on Baltimore
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e4a2/3e4a2077c1f3e45dab8e238c44b7bb2b3ea4d05c" alt="Mulva's avatar"
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Dec 14, 2014 2:33pm
Bills D is so legit. Rodgers 7/22 for 71 yards.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60400/604006f5f4305ec6de1678e66cabc17d484a4a39" alt="robj55's avatar"
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Dec 14, 2014 2:34pm
Their D line is dominant.Mulva;1686001 wrote:Bills D is so legit. Rodgers 7/22 for 71 yards.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/241f9/241f9d4fe5410d9a5e43866e5e348cd864e54220" alt="Classyposter58's avatar"
Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
Dec 14, 2014 2:35pm
Ha I guess it wasn't Pettine after allMulva;1686001 wrote:Bills D is so legit. Rodgers 7/22 for 71 yards.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04070/040706bb489394922a49b721280970518891060e" alt="gerb131's avatar"
gerb131
Posts: 9,932
Dec 14, 2014 2:37pm
keep the faith. 12-10 jags at halfIronman92;1685997 wrote:We both know better though
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1da73/1da730efff03326445fb35ac5166005cbb876f87" alt="like_that's avatar"
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Dec 14, 2014 2:44pm
Except pettine had a top 5 defense every year with the Jets... DerpClassyposter58;1686009 wrote:Ha I guess it wasn't Pettine after all
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da226/da226623a910db13449c264ab3d953bffc68537e" alt="Ironman92's avatar"
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Dec 14, 2014 4:16pm
Bills just beat one of the best in football....their defense is fun to watch. As long as they don't keep my team out, I hope they find a way into the playoffs.
The QB fumble rule inside of 2 min is absurd.
The QB fumble rule inside of 2 min is absurd.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f46a/5f46a4a674f4cc5b7dc46bcf04a3ba10b64f0ba9" alt="Azubuike24's avatar"
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Dec 14, 2014 4:20pm
Denver, New England and Indianapolis will win their divisions. It all depends now on the North and the wild card.
Cincinnati (9-4-1) - vs DEN, at PIT
Baltimore (9-5) - at HOU, vs CLE
Pittsburgh (9-5) - vs PIT, vs CIN
Kansas City (8-6) - at PIT, vs SD
San Diego (8-5) - vs DEN, at SF, at KC
Buffalo (8-6) - at OAK, at NE
There's a very good chance at 9-6-1, the Bengals will get the 6th seed. Both KC and SD can't both win 10, unless SD beats Denver today. Buffalo is an unlikely candidate to win 10 as they play at New England, and obviously Pittsburgh also plays KC which would impact the North too.
Cincinnati (9-4-1) - vs DEN, at PIT
Baltimore (9-5) - at HOU, vs CLE
Pittsburgh (9-5) - vs PIT, vs CIN
Kansas City (8-6) - at PIT, vs SD
San Diego (8-5) - vs DEN, at SF, at KC
Buffalo (8-6) - at OAK, at NE
There's a very good chance at 9-6-1, the Bengals will get the 6th seed. Both KC and SD can't both win 10, unless SD beats Denver today. Buffalo is an unlikely candidate to win 10 as they play at New England, and obviously Pittsburgh also plays KC which would impact the North too.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de341/de341c5dd4f81cb0191d371a4d4f62de9a43fa77" alt="Iliketurtles's avatar"
Iliketurtles
Posts: 8,191
Dec 14, 2014 4:34pm
That's not a QB fumble rule. That is any fumble inside 2 minutes. But I agree the rule is dumb.Ironman92;1686089 wrote:Bills just beat one of the best in football....their defense is fun to watch. As long as they don't keep my team out, I hope they find a way into the playoffs.
The QB fumble rule inside of 2 min is absurd.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da226/da226623a910db13449c264ab3d953bffc68537e" alt="Ironman92's avatar"
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Dec 14, 2014 4:40pm
They first read it as a QB rule.Iliketurtles;1686096 wrote:That's not a QB fumble rule. That is any fumble inside 2 minutes. But I agree the rule is dumb.
If only the player can recover then only the defender who caused it should be allowed.
Dumb
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f46a/5f46a4a674f4cc5b7dc46bcf04a3ba10b64f0ba9" alt="Azubuike24's avatar"
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Dec 14, 2014 4:42pm
The spirit of the rule is right. Guy fighting for 4th down yards, just short, can't just fumble the ball (any direction) and keep hope alive they get a first down. However, it's really stupid when it applies to the play it did in this game because it's clear that Rodgers didn't lose it on purpose and Lacy actually made a nice play to scoop it up and escape the end zone.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da226/da226623a910db13449c264ab3d953bffc68537e" alt="Ironman92's avatar"
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Dec 14, 2014 4:43pm
It's too jam-packed and everyone plays everyone. Tough to predict. The Bills just made it messier....Chargers and Chiefs could do the same this week and Chiefs vs Steelers.Azubuike24;1686092 wrote:Denver, New England and Indianapolis will win their divisions. It all depends now on the North and the wild card.
Cincinnati (9-4-1) - vs DEN, at PIT
Baltimore (9-5) - at HOU, vs CLE
Pittsburgh (9-5) - vs PIT, vs CIN
Kansas City (8-6) - at PIT, vs SD
San Diego (8-5) - vs DEN, at SF, at KC
Buffalo (8-6) - at OAK, at NE
There's a very good chance at 9-6-1, the Bengals will get the 6th seed. Both KC and SD can't both win 10, unless SD beats Denver today. Buffalo is an unlikely candidate to win 10 as they play at New England, and obviously Pittsburgh also plays KC which would impact the North too.
What I know most is I want the Steelers to beat the Chiefs and the Ravens to lose at Houston.....I think that would get Pittsburgh in mathematically.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da226/da226623a910db13449c264ab3d953bffc68537e" alt="Ironman92's avatar"
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Dec 14, 2014 4:44pm
I hope San Fran finds a way to win today so next week vs SD will mean a lot.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da226/da226623a910db13449c264ab3d953bffc68537e" alt="Ironman92's avatar"
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Dec 14, 2014 4:46pm
Looks like Buffalo will have the benefit of playing NE in the final week and guessing it won't mean shit to NE as they have already defeated Cincy, Denver and Indy
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da226/da226623a910db13449c264ab3d953bffc68537e" alt="Ironman92's avatar"
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Dec 14, 2014 4:47pm
Should only be a forward rule if anyAzubuike24;1686099 wrote:The spirit of the rule is right. Guy fighting for 4th down yards, just short, can't just fumble the ball (any direction) and keep hope alive they get a first down. However, it's really stupid when it applies to the play it did in this game because it's clear that Rodgers didn't lose it on purpose and Lacy actually made a nice play to scoop it up and escape the end zone.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f46a/5f46a4a674f4cc5b7dc46bcf04a3ba10b64f0ba9" alt="Azubuike24's avatar"
Azubuike24
Posts: 15,933
Dec 14, 2014 4:47pm
The Steelers clinch a spot if they beat the Chiefs and the Broncos beat San Diego. They would win any tiebreaker with another 9-7 team due to AFC record.
In the end, I think it really comes down to 3 AFC North teams getting in....the order is what will go down to the final week.
In the end, I think it really comes down to 3 AFC North teams getting in....the order is what will go down to the final week.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da226/da226623a910db13449c264ab3d953bffc68537e" alt="Ironman92's avatar"
Ironman92
Posts: 49,363
Dec 14, 2014 4:52pm
I knew they had they fewest AFC conference losses of the bunch....wasn't sure if they ended 8-4 in the conference if someone could match it and then maybe win the next go to tie-breaker.Azubuike24;1686106 wrote:The Steelers clinch a spot if they beat the Chiefs and the Broncos beat San Diego. They would win any tiebreaker with another 9-7 team due to AFC record.
In the end, I think it really comes down to 3 AFC North teams getting in....the order is what will go down to the final week.
Lol nothing is easy. Their defense stinks.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de341/de341c5dd4f81cb0191d371a4d4f62de9a43fa77" alt="Iliketurtles's avatar"
Iliketurtles
Posts: 8,191
Dec 14, 2014 4:57pm
If you don't believe in Karma then just watch the Jets/Titans game the last 2 plays.
1st Vick is almost tackled in the end zone but loses the ball and they call it a fumble. It was clearly a pass so the Titans coach challenges the play. They confirm and call it a forward pass and it was intentional grounding and they give the Titans a safety. By the letter of rules they shouldn't have been able to go back and give a penalty for intentional grounding. Then on the free punt the Titans dude muffed it and the Jets recovered.
I guess my understanding was wrong...that a ref said prior to reviewing the play that if he was indeed a pass the ref would have called in intentional grounding and so that's why after they reviewed the play they were able to rule intentional grounding? That makes no sense to me how they can do that.
1st Vick is almost tackled in the end zone but loses the ball and they call it a fumble. It was clearly a pass so the Titans coach challenges the play. They confirm and call it a forward pass and it was intentional grounding and they give the Titans a safety. By the letter of rules they shouldn't have been able to go back and give a penalty for intentional grounding. Then on the free punt the Titans dude muffed it and the Jets recovered.
I guess my understanding was wrong...that a ref said prior to reviewing the play that if he was indeed a pass the ref would have called in intentional grounding and so that's why after they reviewed the play they were able to rule intentional grounding? That makes no sense to me how they can do that.