B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Feb 2, 2015 9:24am
Yeah, not really. I may bring up things that the media says but is it necessary to make a post just to single out people? Wasn't "I'd like to bring up that the media pretty much had written the patriots off after getting their asses kicked in week 4 sufficient? But I guess whatever helps him sleep at night.....lhslep134;1702150 wrote:Br this is a fair criticism. You always bring up what the media is saying.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Feb 2, 2015 9:26am
Does it matter? If the "clique" doesn't like a poster (see fly4fun's mod status) the mob rules. I never really noticed fly4fun's moderation habits but boy did a lot of people get "butthurt", as some say, about his habits and got him demoted.SportsAndLady;1702155 wrote:So which former user are you?
I'm gonna guess Said
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Feb 2, 2015 9:32am
Lol sticking up for F4F?BR1986FB;1702159 wrote:Does it matter? If the "clique" doesn't like a poster (see fly4fun's mod status) the mob rules. I never really noticed fly4fun's moderation habits but boy did a lot of people get "butthurt", as some say, about his habits and got him demoted.
You've reached new lows.
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Feb 2, 2015 9:32am
That's irrelevant to me, that's between you and him. All I said was it's a fair point. There are a ton of your posts that start with, "I heard [insert media name] saying [insert football story]"BR1986FB;1702157 wrote:Yeah, not really. I may bring up things that the media says but is it necessary to make a post just to single out people?
You can interpret it however you want. I'm not saying it insultingly, because as you said it's a discussion starter.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Feb 2, 2015 9:37am
I really have no "dog" in the F4F fight. He could be the biggest a-hole on the planet (don't know the dude or his posting habits) but I found it funny how there was this grassroots/mob rules crusade to get him booted as a mod. And people want to call ME "butthurt?" LOL...SportsAndLady;1702160 wrote:Lol sticking up for F4F?
You've reached new lows.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Feb 2, 2015 9:37am
Fair enoughlhslep134;1702161 wrote:That's irrelevant to me, that's between you and him. All I said was it's a fair point. There are a ton of your posts that start with, "I heard [insert media name] saying [insert football story]"
You can interpret it however you want. I'm not saying it insultingly, because as you said it's a discussion starter.
Uz2Bon36
Posts: 1,135
Feb 2, 2015 9:39am
Are you like_that's multi or just his bitch?SportsAndLady;1702155 wrote:So which former user are you?
I'm gonna guess Said
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Feb 2, 2015 9:39am
I never brought up br's real name. I don't even know who he is, nor do I care. I'm not some low life loser like said where I post people's personal info.Uz2Bon36;1702152 wrote:Imagine that. Didn't somebody mention like_that's name or something and he got all butt hurt and had that user banned?
You want your personal info on this site, after what that dipshit did to cc?
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Feb 2, 2015 9:41am
You mean the majority of the site? Lol at making it seem like only a few posters got him demoted. I wasn't even the one who brought up the vote, the creator of this site did.BR1986FB;1702159 wrote:Does it matter? If the "clique" doesn't like a poster (see fly4fun's mod status) the mob rules. I never really noticed fly4fun's moderation habits but boy did a lot of people get "butthurt", as some say, about his habits and got him demoted.
Notice how you can say I live a pathetic life and not get banned? That's because c4f isn't a mod.
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Feb 2, 2015 9:55am
Can we get back on topic?
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Feb 2, 2015 9:58am
Brady is such a douche.Raw Dawgin' it;1702175 wrote:Can we get back on topic?
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Feb 2, 2015 10:00am
Did Belichick know that not calling the timeout after the Seahawks ran on 1st and goal would result in them throwing the ball?
IMO there's only two realistic scenarios the Patriots win that game after Lynch got tackled at the one: Patriots call timeout with :50 left and let lynch score then try and win the game with the ball, 1 timeout, and 50 seconds; or the Seahawks turn the ball over. It's highly improbable they would have fumbled, so really the only way Belichick wins if they don't let Seattle score on purpose is an INT.
I know NE could have won on a turnover on downs but I don't think they could have stopped Lynch two more times.
IMO there's only two realistic scenarios the Patriots win that game after Lynch got tackled at the one: Patriots call timeout with :50 left and let lynch score then try and win the game with the ball, 1 timeout, and 50 seconds; or the Seahawks turn the ball over. It's highly improbable they would have fumbled, so really the only way Belichick wins if they don't let Seattle score on purpose is an INT.
I know NE could have won on a turnover on downs but I don't think they could have stopped Lynch two more times.
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Feb 2, 2015 10:00am
He's the GOAT douche.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Feb 2, 2015 10:03am
No doubtAutomatik;1702180 wrote:He's the GOAT douche.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Feb 2, 2015 10:05am
This is where some of the dumbass conspiracy theories come in. I can't stand either team but I was rooting for NE and I'm yelling at the TV "Belichick, you dumbass....call a tiemout and let them score!" It's almost like he knew something. I don't think anyone else on the planet thinks Carroll throws it there with Beast Mode in the backfield.lhslep134;1702179 wrote:Did Belichick know that not calling the timeout after the Seahawks ran on 1st and goal would result in them throwing the ball?
IMO there's only two scenarios the Patriots win that game after Lynch got tackled at the one: Patriots call timeout with :50 left and let lynch score then try and win the game with the ball, 1 timeout, and 50 seconds; or the Seahawks turn the ball over. It's highly improbable they would have fumbled, so really the only way Belichick wins if they don't let Seattle score on purpose is an INT.
S
Sonofanump
Feb 2, 2015 10:08am
He actually did. You can review recent threads and find out his ID rather quickly if one wanted to.like_that;1702167 wrote:You want your personal info on this site, after what that dipshit did to cc?
F
friendfromlowry
Posts: 6,239
Feb 2, 2015 10:09am
Idk why, but I've always thought Gronk to be more of a douche than Brady.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Feb 2, 2015 10:11am
I see Gronk as more "Jersey Shore/bro' douchie while Brady comes across as more "pompous" douchie with those clothes that his wife dresses him up in.friendfromlowry;1702187 wrote:Idk why, but I've always thought Gronk to be more of a douche than Brady.
Don't get me wrong, I think most of us would take Brady's "douchie" lifestyle.
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Feb 2, 2015 10:12am
I kind of think Carroll was waiting for Belichick to call timeout and then when he realized it wasn't happening, scrambled to call a high percentage pass so they'd be able to run on 3rd if it was incomplete.BR1986FB;1702183 wrote:This is where some of the dumbass conspiracy theories come in. I can't stand either team but I was rooting for NE and I'm yelling at the TV "Belichick, you dumbass....call a tiemout and let them score!" It's almost like he knew something. I don't think anyone else on the planet thinks Carroll throws it there with Beast Mode in the backfield.
Unfortunately for Carroll, when you have a high percentage play in the red zone but Bill Belichick has 2 weeks to prepare, that high percentage play isn't so high anymore. Lo and behold, Pats jump the play and win the game.
Uz2Bon36
Posts: 1,135
Feb 2, 2015 10:14am
reps.Automatik;1702180 wrote:He's the GOAT douche.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Feb 2, 2015 10:14am
Very possible. I was just shocked by a) no timeout by Belichick and b) a pass from the one yard line. Makes Belichick look like a genius in the end, as usual.lhslep134;1702190 wrote:I kind of think Carroll was waiting for Belichick to call timeout and then when he realized it wasn't happening, scrambled to call a high percentage pass so they'd be able to run on 3rd if it was incomplete.
Unfortunately for Carroll, when you have a high percentage play in the red zone but Bill Belichick has 2 weeks to prepare, that high percentage play isn't so high anymore. Lo and behold, Pats jump the play and win the game.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
Feb 2, 2015 10:19am
I think this is the end of Seattle. The team has worked because they have a lot of young talent that is underpaid to their value. Expect this current team to dissolve in the offseason.
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Feb 2, 2015 11:11am
He's just a giant child having a great time.BR1986FB;1702189 wrote:I see Gronk as more "Jersey Shore/bro' douchie while Brady comes across as more "pompous" douchie with those clothes that his wife dresses him up in.
Don't get me wrong, I think most of us would take Brady's "douchie" lifestyle.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Feb 2, 2015 11:17am
Is BR really trying to call ppl out for being butthurt? ROLFCOPTERLMAO
The same BR who QQ'd and has "left" this site over his feelz getting hurt multiple times? Hey pot, kettle here.
The same BR who QQ'd and has "left" this site over his feelz getting hurt multiple times? Hey pot, kettle here.
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
Feb 2, 2015 11:18am
and with how brash many of their players are I think some publicly point fingers and it becomes a mess in-house.sleeper;1702194 wrote:I think this is the end of Seattle. The team has worked because they have a lot of young talent that is underpaid to their value. Expect this current team to dissolve in the offseason.