2014-2015 Random NFL Thread

Home Archive Pro Sports 2014-2015 Random NFL Thread
Raw Dawgin' it's avatar

Raw Dawgin' it

Just Ain't Care

11,466 posts
Jan 21, 2015 8:50 AM
SportsAndLady;1698354 wrote:Not sure but it really doesn't matter. If Rodgers is cheating he should get in trouble too. Point is, the patriots cheated and this isn't their first time getting caught cheating.

Their reputation is destroyed by being a bunch of cheaters.
I'm sure they care a whole lot.
Jan 21, 2015 8:50am
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Jan 21, 2015 8:53 AM
Both links you posted said Rodgers prefers over inflated footballs and he wishes the NFL didn't take air out of them to meet the requirements. Nowhere does it say he cheats and pumps them back up. In the deadspin article, it is unclear if he pushes the limit before the league checks or after.
Jan 21, 2015 8:53am
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Jan 21, 2015 8:58 AM
Laley23;1698361 wrote:Both links you posted said Rodgers prefers over inflated footballs and he wishes the NFL didn't take air out of them to meet the requirements. Nowhere does it say he cheats and pumps them back up. In the deadspin article, it is unclear if he pushes the limit before the league checks or after.
It doesn't even matter. Getting caught cheating and immediately saying "well ______ does it too!" Is the response you'd get from a 5 year old who gets caught taking cookies from the pantry and immediately blames his brother.
Jan 21, 2015 8:58am
F

friendfromlowry

Senior Member

6,239 posts
Jan 21, 2015 8:58 AM
Laley23;1698361 wrote:Both links you posted said Rodgers prefers over inflated footballs and he wishes the NFL didn't take air out of them to meet the requirements. Nowhere does it say he cheats and pumps them back up. In the deadspin article, it is unclear if he pushes the limit before the league checks or after.
"My belief is that there should be a minimum air-pressure requirement but not a maximum. There's no advantage, in my opinion -- we're not kicking the football -- there's no advantage in having a pumped-up football.
Sounds like he doesn't think what he's doing is cheating, but says that what the Patriots did is.
Jan 21, 2015 8:58am
F

friendfromlowry

Senior Member

6,239 posts
Jan 21, 2015 9:01 AM
Pick6;1698341 wrote:Who gives a fuck honestly? I couldn't give a damn about the Pats. So what it makes it easier to catch, you ever try throwing a flat football? D'qwell probably has his "flat" football to thank for his int tbh.
A lot of people give a fuck. It's all over ESPN, Yahoo Sports, CBS Sports, Twitter, etc.
Pick6;1698349 wrote:filming practices is fucked up, stepping out on the field to stop somebody from scoring is fucked up. deflating balls making them easier to catch and harder to throw isn't fucked up. its a tradeoff.
So you admit it makes it easier to catch. It's not however a tradeoff if only one team is doing it.
Jan 21, 2015 9:01am
Raw Dawgin' it's avatar

Raw Dawgin' it

Just Ain't Care

11,466 posts
Jan 21, 2015 9:04 AM
Laley23;1698361 wrote:Both links you posted said Rodgers prefers over inflated footballs and he wishes the NFL didn't take air out of them to meet the requirements. Nowhere does it say he cheats and pumps them back up. In the deadspin article, it is unclear if he pushes the limit before the league checks or after.
"I like to push the limits of how much air we can put in the football, even go over what they allow you to do"

Did you watch the video? So he does put more air in them and then lets the refs take it out if he gets caught. So how is it different?

The officials had no problem with the balls the patriots were using, so what's the problem? Maybe they should blame the referees for not knowing.
Jan 21, 2015 9:04am
Raw Dawgin' it's avatar

Raw Dawgin' it

Just Ain't Care

11,466 posts
Jan 21, 2015 9:41 AM
Another thing is - if they can't prove how the balls were deflated after referee inspection, then how do we know that the referees did not make a mistake an approve the under inflated balls?
Jan 21, 2015 9:41am
HitsRus's avatar

HitsRus

Senior Member

9,206 posts
Jan 21, 2015 9:44 AM
SportsAndLady;1698363 wrote:It doesn't even matter. Getting caught cheating and immediately saying "well ______ does it too!" Is the response you'd get from a 5 year old who gets caught taking cookies from the pantry and immediately blames his brother.
LOL at trying to justify this by saying "Aaron Rodgers does it too!"...Rules are rules...you either play by them and expect ALL to play by them, or you throw them out. In this case you either enforce the inflation rules or you just let the QB's inflate them to wherever they want them. A ball is either regulation or it's not.

It's like corking a bat in baseball.....you get caught cheating, there is a price to pay. here is no "Well, Albert Belle did it" excuse that allows you to skate.
Jan 21, 2015 9:44am
Raw Dawgin' it's avatar

Raw Dawgin' it

Just Ain't Care

11,466 posts
Jan 21, 2015 9:50 AM
HitsRus;1698379 wrote:LOL at trying to justify this by saying "Aaron Rodgers does it too!"...Rules are rules...you either play by them and expect ALL to play by them, or you throw them out. In this case you either enforce the inflation rules or you just let the QB's inflate them to wherever they want them. A ball is either regulation or it's not.

It's like corking a bat in baseball.....you get caught cheating, there is a price to pay. here is no "Well, Albert Belle did it" excuse that allows you to skate.
So say they find that no one tampered with the balls after the referee inspection - is there still a penalty to the Patriots for the referees making a mistake?
Jan 21, 2015 9:50am
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Jan 21, 2015 10:00 AM
Raw Dawgin' it;1698380 wrote:So say they find that no one tampered with the balls after the referee inspection - is there still a penalty to the Patriots for the referees making a mistake?
Hi I'm earth, have we met?
Jan 21, 2015 10:00am
Raw Dawgin' it's avatar

Raw Dawgin' it

Just Ain't Care

11,466 posts
Jan 21, 2015 10:05 AM
SportsAndLady;1698385 wrote:Hi I'm earth, have we met?
Clearly not - but if the referees approved the games balls and there was no tampering with them after the fact, then this is on the referees.
Jan 21, 2015 10:05am
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Jan 21, 2015 10:15 AM
Raw Dawgin' it;1698358 wrote:They could suspend him and i bet he finds a way to coach the team. I honestly don't think they give a shit about punishments for anything they do.
They don't give a shit about the punishments, which is exactly why the nfl should come down hard on them. The fact this isn't their first rodeo shows they have no regard for the integrity of the game. A message needs to be sent. Lol at trying to down play it though.
Jan 21, 2015 10:15am
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Jan 21, 2015 10:17 AM
Raw Dawgin' it;1698380 wrote:So say they find that no one tampered with the balls after the referee inspection - is there still a penalty to the Patriots for the referees making a mistake?
Yup, 11/12 balls just happened to magically be deflated after they passed the final inspection before kickoff. Just admit your team cheats and move on.
Jan 21, 2015 10:17am
Raw Dawgin' it's avatar

Raw Dawgin' it

Just Ain't Care

11,466 posts
Jan 21, 2015 10:26 AM
like_that;1698391 wrote:Yup, 11/12 balls just happened to magically be deflated after they passed the final inspection before kickoff. Just admit your team cheats and move on.
Ok they cheat. I'm not saying they're innocent. I'm saying, if they weren't tampered with after final inspection, then they clearly weren't inspected correctly, and who's fault is that? Until the penalty is forfeiting the game, i don't think there is any penalty that would change their mentality. They fine them? Suspend BB? Take away draft picks? I don't think they view that punishment as worse than the reward. Replace them in the SB with the Colts then and send a message then and see if they continue to break rules.
Jan 21, 2015 10:26am
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Jan 21, 2015 10:31 AM
Raw Dawgin' it;1698393 wrote:Ok they cheat. I'm not saying they're innocent. I'm saying, if they weren't tampered with after final inspection, then they clearly weren't inspected correctly, and who's fault is that? Until the penalty is forfeiting the game, i don't think there is any penalty that would change their mentality. They fine them? Suspend BB? Take away draft picks? I don't think they view that punishment as worse than the reward. Replace them in the SB with the Colts then and send a message then and see if they continue to break rules.
That will NEVER happen.
Jan 21, 2015 10:31am
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Jan 21, 2015 10:31 AM
Raw Dawgin' it;1698393 wrote:Ok they cheat. I'm not saying they're innocent. I'm saying, if they weren't tampered with after final inspection, then they clearly weren't inspected correctly, and who's fault is that? Until the penalty is forfeiting the game, i don't think there is any penalty that would change their mentality. They fine them? Suspend BB? Take away draft picks? I don't think they view that punishment as worse than the reward. Replace them in the SB with the Colts then and send a message then and see if they continue to break rules.
If they take away the first round pick I think thy would care, especially considering their window of opportunity is closing with Brady getting older. They are going to need the picks.
Jan 21, 2015 10:31am
Raw Dawgin' it's avatar

Raw Dawgin' it

Just Ain't Care

11,466 posts
Jan 21, 2015 10:34 AM
wildcats20;1698394 wrote:That will NEVER happen.
I know. I was just making a point that i think they trade any punishment for a chance to play for a title.
Jan 21, 2015 10:34am
Ironman92's avatar

Ironman92

Administrator

49,363 posts
Jan 21, 2015 10:58 AM
I feel this is one of the dozens of things that athletes and coaches do across the board. I feel every advantage is looked at and athletes/coaches are continually finding ways to do this type of thing. Baseball, basketball and football...cheaters, rule breakers, rule benders in all facets from what they are allowed to put into their bodies to how can I docter up the baseball, steal signs, devise schemes that find holes in the rules, water down the base paths, deceive the refs/umps, humidor the balls.

I'm going to watch the Super Bowl and not care about any of this stuff. It's dumb and naive. I don't condone any of it. I would take their first 3 draft picks from them if the story keeps unfolding.
Jan 21, 2015 10:58am
T

thavoice

Senior Member

14,376 posts
Jan 21, 2015 11:17 AM
So they were saying this AM they were weighed at halftime....assuming they were then filled back to normal?
May have to root for Seattle.....

As a former QB I can say that yeah, under inflated balls are easier to throw no doubt about that. Now...how much they have to be under inflated to actually feel and notice a difference? That I dont know.
Jan 21, 2015 11:17am
T

thavoice

Senior Member

14,376 posts
Jan 21, 2015 11:19 AM
like_that;1698395 wrote:If they take away the first round pick I think thy would care, especially considering their window of opportunity is closing with Brady getting older. They are going to need the picks.
I am not sure they really care a whole lot as the window is now. Losing the 31st or 32nd pick isnt a huge deal when you are needing to win NOW>
Jan 21, 2015 11:19am
HitsRus's avatar

HitsRus

Senior Member

9,206 posts
Jan 21, 2015 12:08 PM
If you suspend Josh Gordon for a borderline fail of a marijuana test, what's the penalty for on-field cheating?

The NFL should thoroughly investigate the affair in the off season and if it is shown that this is as it appears, then suspend Brady for at least 6 games next year...and Belichick for a year (since this is his second offense) Fine Kraft and take away a draft pick. Plus put the team on probation for 5 years, and if there are any more incidents Kraft should be forced to sell the team.
If Donald Sterling can lose his franchise over a surrepticiously recording of a private conversation, then most certainly the NFL has the power to remove an owner whose team continues to willfully cheat.
Jan 21, 2015 12:08pm
T

thavoice

Senior Member

14,376 posts
Jan 21, 2015 12:13 PM
HitsRus;1698435 wrote:If you suspend Josh Gordon for a borderline fail of a marijuana test, what's the penalty for on-field cheating?

The NFL should thoroughly investigate the affair in the off season and if it is shown that this is as it appears, then suspend Brady for at least 6 games next year...and Belichick for a year (since this is his second offense) Fine Kraft and take away a draft pick. Plus put the team on probation for 5 years, and if there are any more incidents Kraft should be forced to sell the team.
If Donald Sterling can lose his franchise over a surrepticiously recording of a private conversation, then most certainly the NFL has the power to remove an owner whose team continues to willfully cheat.
We all know that was just an overreaction as anytime the N word is spewed from someone of power everyone goes overboard on punishment because if they done then it makes it seem they condone it.
NO way he should have been forced to get rid of his team. Fine him and whatever, and if blacks wanted to start boycotting signing with him then, well, that is within the rights and he eventually would have to get rid of it.

I think 1st round draft picks should be taken. Fines really mean nothing, but go ahead and fine them and that money go toward purchasing football inflators for HS football programs....ha
Jan 21, 2015 12:13pm
Mulva's avatar

Mulva

Senior Member

13,650 posts
Jan 21, 2015 12:19 PM
Would not be surprised to see Belichick get Sean Payton'd.

Will not be faux outraged either way.
Jan 21, 2015 12:19pm
HitsRus's avatar

HitsRus

Senior Member

9,206 posts
Jan 21, 2015 12:25 PM
Leagues need to take "integrity of the sport" issues seriously. I have no problem with a league removing an owner whose teams cheat. I definitely think Brady and Belichek should get a suspension, possibly others depending on who was complicit.
Jan 21, 2015 12:25pm