At least St Louis isn't in Ohio

Midstate01's avatar

Midstate01

14,766 posts
Lol this attorney for the family hires a professional to do an autopsy. The autopsy shows no shots were fired from behind. The family then has a presser and completely changes what the man who did the autopsy says...

Bet the media will run with this too...
Aug 18, 2014 10:39am
vdubb96's avatar

vdubb96

2,210 posts
TedSheckler;1645169 wrote:

"This creepy-ass cracker cop was following Michael Brown. I told him the cop might be a rapist."
Her neck is huge!!!!!!
Aug 18, 2014 10:47am
V

vball10set

24,795 posts
vdubb96;1645191 wrote:Her neck is huge!!!!!!
Aug 18, 2014 10:52am
G

gut

15,058 posts
Midstate01;1645188 wrote:Lol this attorney for the family hires a professional to do an autopsy...
Attorney has to be pissed he'll probaby never recoup what he paid for that autopsy. The past few days have seen a wrongful death suit go from millions to jack fucking squat.
Aug 18, 2014 10:53am
G

gut

15,058 posts
vdubb96;1645191 wrote:Her neck is huge!!!!!!
Eventually the fat runs out of other places to go.
Aug 18, 2014 10:54am
W

WebFire

14,779 posts
vdubb96;1645191 wrote:Her is huge!!!!!!
FIFY
Aug 18, 2014 11:02am
bases_loaded's avatar

bases_loaded

6,912 posts
So he exits the police car then chargers officer that has his gun drawn. Officer fires, still charging, fires, still charging, fires until he drops.

Black people riot and destroy other peoples property.

Media goes nuts.

President dances to jazz.
Aug 18, 2014 11:18am
W

WebFire

14,779 posts
bases_loaded;1645203 wrote:So he exits the police car then chargers officer that has his gun drawn. Officer fires, still charging, fires, still charging, fires until he drops.

Black people riot and destroy other peoples property.

Media goes nuts.

President dances to jazz.
Sounds accurate.
Aug 18, 2014 11:22am
K

KB0938

900 posts
Midstate01;1645121 wrote:I also am laughing at these reporters saying it's like a war zone. 1) how would they know. 2) I think you should be really careful with how you say that.

This whole thing is completely fucked up.

Also, and yea I know CNN blows, but tonight everyone they interview is black. Everyone doing the interviewing is black. There is one white woman. The rest of these people are black. They never ever ever ask questions about how this situation could have been brought on by this kid. Not once. Every single interview is talking about war zone, cops going too far, innocent black kids.
Tends to happen when the area is majority black...
Aug 18, 2014 2:33pm
robj55's avatar

robj55

9,511 posts
This race shit is annoying.
Aug 18, 2014 2:35pm
V

vball10set

24,795 posts
bases_loaded;1645203 wrote:So he exits the police car then chargers officer that has his gun drawn. Officer fires, still charging, fires, still charging, fires until he drops.

Black people riot and destroy other peoples property.

Media goes nuts.

President golfs.
fify

Aug 18, 2014 2:54pm
bases_loaded's avatar

bases_loaded

6,912 posts
cavity backed nikes...could've guessed
Aug 18, 2014 3:01pm
Midstate01's avatar

Midstate01

14,766 posts
KB0938;1645279 wrote:Tends to happen when the area is majority black...
I meant "experts" not on the street. Should have clarified.
Aug 18, 2014 3:20pm
derek bomar's avatar

derek bomar

3,722 posts
so... he was shot at distance charging? the whole thing seems off. I'm glad he wasn't shot in the back, but why the hell was he shot at all is what I want to know? You only using deadly force if your life is in danger, and I'm pretty sure that from a distance someone who is unarmed is incapable of mortally wounding you. So I'm not sure why he was shot.

Bring on the hate now...
Aug 18, 2014 3:39pm
Q

QuakerOats

8,740 posts
rmolin73;1644568 wrote:You must be ccrunners dumb ass uncle. Lol carry on.

I merely asked a question in search of information; sorry you did not have any appropriate answers.
Aug 18, 2014 3:39pm
W

WebFire

14,779 posts
derek bomar;1645298 wrote:so... he was shot at distance charging? the whole thing seems off. I'm glad he wasn't shot in the back, but why the hell was he shot at all is what I want to know? You only using deadly force if your life is in danger, and I'm pretty sure that from a distance someone who is unarmed is incapable of mortally wounding you. So I'm not sure why he was shot.

Bring on the hate now...
I actually wonder the same. What made the officer(s) draw weapon to begin with if he was only running off? And why did they not just try to take him down if he was unarmed? Did they think he was armed?
Aug 18, 2014 3:53pm
rmolin73's avatar

rmolin73

4,278 posts
QuakerOats;1645299 wrote:I merely asked a question in search of information; sorry you did not have any appropriate answers.
My mistake in thinking that someone that uses the search function as adamantly as you would use it to find the information.
Aug 18, 2014 4:09pm
Glory Days's avatar

Glory Days

7,809 posts
derek bomar;1645298 wrote:so... he was shot at distance charging? the whole thing seems off. I'm glad he wasn't shot in the back, but why the hell was he shot at all is what I want to know? You only using deadly force if your life is in danger, and I'm pretty sure that from a distance someone who is unarmed is incapable of mortally wounding you. So I'm not sure why he was shot.

Bring on the hate now...
because the guy already attempted to grab the gun from the officer one time, should the cop let him get close enough to grab it again and then shoot.....oh wait, that makes sense. going for an officer's gun justifies deadly force. always has.
WebFire;1645306 wrote:I actually wonder the same. What made the officer(s) draw weapon to begin with if he was only running off? And why did they not just try to take him down if he was unarmed? Did they think he was armed?
because the cop already has his gun drawn after firing a shot inside the car. no cop is trained to fire, reholster, fire, reholster, fire etc etc. you shoot, stop the threat, scan the area for more threats, then when you deem it safe, you reholster. and like I typed above, the guy already tried to take the gun from the cop, there is no way in hell that cop is going to let him get close enough to try and take the gun again.
Aug 18, 2014 4:22pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

35,632 posts
derek bomar;1645298 wrote:so... he was shot at distance charging? the whole thing seems off. I'm glad he wasn't shot in the back, but why the hell was he shot at all is what I want to know? You only using deadly force if your life is in danger, and I'm pretty sure that from a distance someone who is unarmed is incapable of mortally wounding you. So I'm not sure why he was shot.

Bring on the hate now...
No one is going to hate on you for wondering that. I think everyone wonders that. Look, no one wants people shot in this country. You can be both in the police officers favor AND be upset an 18 year old was shot and killed.
Aug 18, 2014 4:29pm
Raw Dawgin' it's avatar

Raw Dawgin' it

11,466 posts
WebFire;1645306 wrote:I actually wonder the same. What made the officer(s) draw weapon to begin with if he was only running off? And why did they not just try to take him down if he was unarmed? Did they think he was armed?
I heard they got into a confrontation at the officers cruisers, MB ran off, and according to the video, started charging back. If he was attached while in the car that's why he'd have his gun drawn, and if he was charging he may have been justified in shooting to protect himself, since MB is the size of a lineman, or he panicked. Either way it's impossible to tell if MB had anything concealed until after.
Aug 18, 2014 4:40pm
Raw Dawgin' it's avatar

Raw Dawgin' it

11,466 posts
Glory Days;1645318 wrote:because the guy already attempted to grab the gun from the officer one time, should the cop let him get close enough to grab it again and then shoot.....oh wait, that makes sense. going for an officer's gun justifies deadly force. always has.



because the cop already has his gun drawn after firing a shot inside the car. no cop is trained to fire, reholster, fire, reholster, fire etc etc. you shoot, stop the threat, scan the area for more threats, then when you deem it safe, you reholster. and like I typed above, the guy already tried to take the gun from the cop, there is no way in hell that cop is going to let him get close enough to try and take the gun again.

this
Aug 18, 2014 4:41pm
Q

QuakerOats

8,740 posts
rmolin73;1645312 wrote:My mistake in thinking that someone that uses the search function as adamantly as you would use it to find the information.


My bad; I thought a few countries would immediately come to mind and be offered up by the superior intellects on board here.
Aug 18, 2014 4:45pm
derek bomar's avatar

derek bomar

3,722 posts
Glory Days;1645318 wrote:because the guy already attempted to grab the gun from the officer one time, should the cop let him get close enough to grab it again and then shoot.....oh wait, that makes sense. going for an officer's gun justifies deadly force. always has.
Yea actually since he wasn't a) close enough yet to grab it again and b) unarmed... he had no right to shoot him. And I'd like to see the evidence of him trying to grab the gun. Every eye witness account (for what that's worth...) I've seen had the cop trying to grab MB into the cruiser and then MB running. Then MB turns around after being shot at, then gets lit up while saying don't shoot.

I am all for police safety and their right to defend themselves if they feel in any way threatened. And MB should have been arrested. That said, you can't just shoot people because they're running from you and you're pissed. Which is what I suspect happened.
Aug 18, 2014 6:29pm
Pick6's avatar

Pick6

14,946 posts
If that big mother fucker Mike Brown was charging me I would feel like my life was in danger as well, especially considering the prior altercation. Back on the cops side and more than likely staying there.
Aug 18, 2014 6:35pm
H

HelloAgain

537 posts
gut;1645125 wrote:then what you're left with is involuntary manslaughter, at best.
Take his badge, but not his life.
So the penalty for involuntary manslaughter(if that's what it ends up being) is losing your job?
Aug 18, 2014 6:37pm