At least St Louis isn't in Ohio

Serious Business 1,593 replies 72,293 views
H
HelloAgain
Posts: 537
Aug 16, 2014 11:29pm
Midstate01;1644899 wrote:There are also no doubt bad cops. In fact terrible cops. But there are thousands more per every bad one that do their job very well.
That ratio is no where near accurate in any job, much less the sort of demographics drawn towards being a police officer.
K
KB0938
Posts: 900
Aug 16, 2014 11:30pm
Ytowngirlinfla;1644905 wrote:You obviously haven't been watching the news and the "eye witnesses" that saw this happen. They all are straight thugs.
And you can tell this from an interview eh?

Because of their language? or perhaps they had on "thug like clothing"?
Pick6's avatar
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Aug 16, 2014 11:32pm
Ytowngirlinfla;1644903 wrote:I highly doubt this cop just decided to shoot a guy just because. Where has it been said where he was shot? I don't believe that information was released yet, just speculation. And the witnesses that they've been showing on tv, wouldn't hold credibility vs a cops statement. They all look like gangbangers and you think a black person would say yeah he attacked the white cop? Nope no way.
How about the cops release a fucking statement so we have something to compare the eye witness accounts to? As I said in the post above, I'd believe the cops statement if it sounds reasonable. It's hard to give the cop any benefit of the doubt if they dont say anything. And I'm saying all of this under the assumption that he did attack the cop. The issue is, the attack was over and the guy was fleeing, then surrendered himself, then was shot and killed. I think the cop couldn't control his emotions because he just got his ass kicked by some thug and lost it. He didn't shoot him "just because".
Pick6's avatar
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Aug 16, 2014 11:33pm
KB0938;1644908 wrote:And you can tell this from an interview eh?

Because of their language? or perhaps they had on "thug like clothing"?
How about because of rioting, looting, vandalism, etc ?
K
KB0938
Posts: 900
Aug 16, 2014 11:35pm
Pick6;1644910 wrote:How about because of rioting, looting, vandalism, etc ?
I doubt many if any at all of the people who witnessed this happen are the ones out rioting. Those are dumbasses who just look at this as a chance to rob and steal and blend in with the crowd and personally I hope they get eveyrthing coming to them.

But to discredit everyone who could potentially be an eye witness because of idiots rioting, is dumb in itself

Not everyone in a bad neighborhood is bad
Ytowngirlinfla's avatar
Ytowngirlinfla
Posts: 2,295
Aug 16, 2014 11:37pm
Pick6;1644909 wrote:How about the cops release a fucking statement so we have something to compare the eye witness accounts to? As I said in the post above, I'd believe the cops statement if it sounds reasonable. It's hard to give the cop any benefit of the doubt if they dont say anything. And I'm saying all of this under the assumption that he did attack the cop. The issue is, the attack was over and the guy was fleeing, then surrendered himself, then was shot and killed. I think the cop couldn't control his emotions because he just got his ass kicked by some thug and lost it. He didn't shoot him "just because".
Maybe because they are still investigating and interviewing witnesses? They also said they have held back because they didn't want to release the cops name in fear of his security. They release his name yesterday and he is in hiding somewhere.
rmolin73's avatar
rmolin73
Posts: 4,278
Aug 16, 2014 11:45pm
Ytowngirlinfla;1644905 wrote:You obviously haven't been watching the news and the "eye witnesses" that saw this happen. They all are straight thugs.
Yes that makes them unreliable. Smdh
K
KB0938
Posts: 900
Aug 16, 2014 11:47pm
rmolin73;1644917 wrote:Yes that makes them unreliable. Smdh
She explained herself very well. Speculating about the shooting and what happened is stupid because we dont know
Speculating that everybody they interviewed were straight thugs, is completely reasonable
Ytowngirlinfla's avatar
Ytowngirlinfla
Posts: 2,295
Aug 16, 2014 11:54pm
KB0938;1644920 wrote:She explained herself very well. Speculating about the shooting and what happened is stupid because we dont know
Speculating that everybody they interviewed were straight thugs, is completely reasonable
Yes because at least 2 of them looked like Lil Wayne. Sorry I can make all the assumptions I want. Lives in the ghetto, looks like Lil Wayne, I'm sure they are just great people.
rmolin73's avatar
rmolin73
Posts: 4,278
Aug 16, 2014 11:57pm
Ytowngirlinfla;1644924 wrote:Yes because at least 2 of them looked like Lil Wayne. Sorry I can make all the assumptions I want. Lives in the ghetto, looks like Lil Wayne, I'm sure they are just great people.
Lol keep up the good fight then.
H
HelloAgain
Posts: 537
Aug 17, 2014 12:07am
Ytowngirlinfla;1644924 wrote:Yes because at least 2 of them looked like Lil Wayne. Sorry I can make all the assumptions I want. Lives in the ghetto, looks like Lil Wayne, I'm sure they are just great people.
Living in the ghetto generally isn't a choice, but circumstance. And define what "looking like Lil Wayne" means? Facial tattoos? The vast majority of witnesses I've seen interviewed don't have any of those. Clothing? If so, they must be doing pretty well if they dress like Lil Wayne. His wardrobe likely costs more than you make in 10 years.
K
KB0938
Posts: 900
Aug 17, 2014 12:11am
Ytowngirlinfla;1644924 wrote:Yes because at least 2 of them looked like Lil Wayne. Sorry I can make all the assumptions I want. Lives in the ghetto, looks like Lil Wayne, I'm sure they are just great people.
Lmao
Ytowngirlinfla's avatar
Ytowngirlinfla
Posts: 2,295
Aug 17, 2014 12:21am
HelloAgain;1644927 wrote:Living in the ghetto generally isn't a choice, but circumstance. And define what "looking like Lil Wayne" means? Facial tattoos? The vast majority of witnesses I've seen interviewed don't have any of those. Clothing? If so, they must be doing pretty well if they dress like Lil Wayne. His wardrobe likely costs more than you make in 10 years.
The day after this happened CNN was all over interviewing witnesses some were fine and some were all thugged out. Yes they had facial tattoos and grills. Sorry if I equate that to a thug like most people do.
H
HelloAgain
Posts: 537
Aug 17, 2014 12:27am
Ytowngirlinfla;1644905 wrote:You obviously haven't been watching the news and the "eye witnesses" that saw this happen. They all are straight thugs.
Ytowngirlinfla;1644930 wrote:The day after this happened CNN was all over interviewing witnesses some were fine and some were all thugged out. Yes they had facial tattoos and grills. Sorry if I equate that to a thug like most people do.
Could you clarify which post you lied in?
Glory Days's avatar
Glory Days
Posts: 7,809
Aug 17, 2014 12:31am
Midstate01;1644833 wrote:Sure you can stop. But now how they're trained. Shoot to kill. You don't want to shoot,but if you do, you shoot to kill.
Absolutely zero police departments in the US train shoot to kill, to unload the whole magazine etc, none, nowhere. Please stop.
Midstate01;1644834 wrote:There's no such thing as training to shoot in the leg or arm. You aim for the largest region, the chest.
This is only correct thing you have said during this thread. you aim center mass, which is the most likely area to stop the threat.
rmolin73's avatar
rmolin73
Posts: 4,278
Aug 17, 2014 3:41am
Ytowngirlinfla;1644930 wrote:The day after this happened CNN was all over interviewing witnesses some were fine and some were all thugged out. Yes they had facial tattoos and grills. Sorry if I equate that to a thug like most narrow minded people do.
Fify! Back pedal much? So you're essentially saying that since they had dreds and grills that they can't possibly be reliable witnesses? GTFOH with that simple minded shit.
salto's avatar
salto
Posts: 2,611
Aug 17, 2014 3:51am
rmolin73;1644945 wrote:So you're essentially saying that since they had dreds and grills that they can't possibly be reliable witnesses? .
dreds = yes they possibly are reliable.
grills = no. not a chance they're reliable.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Aug 17, 2014 7:40am
rmolin73;1644945 wrote:So you're essentially saying that since they had dreds and grills that they can't possibly be reliable witnesses?
Unfortunately, unless your name is Lil Jon, yes :cool:

K
KB0938
Posts: 900
Aug 17, 2014 1:40pm
[video=youtube;NkijXJc0Yxg][/video]

Somebody from the OC?
bigdaddy2003's avatar
bigdaddy2003
Posts: 7,384
Aug 17, 2014 2:22pm
Lol, what does the sticker say? I couldn't tell.
Iliketurtles's avatar
Iliketurtles
Posts: 8,191
Aug 17, 2014 4:32pm
LOL people still fucking use myspace?

But yeah I couldn't make out what that sticker said either. Dude looks like a fucking douchebag moron though.
rmolin73's avatar
rmolin73
Posts: 4,278
Aug 17, 2014 7:41pm
ccrunner609;1645053 wrote:With this ridiculous media coverage and every race baiter in the country there, this cop isn't getting a fair trial
Lol what did you think the media was going to do? Dude will get a fair trial. Weren't you saying the same thing about Zimmerman not getting a fair trial?
K
KB0938
Posts: 900
Aug 17, 2014 8:21pm
ccrunner609;1645053 wrote:With this ridiculous media coverage and every race baiter in the country there, this cop isn't getting a fair trial
Just like im sure you said GZ wouldnt get one. His trial will be plenty fair
Midstate01's avatar
Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
Aug 17, 2014 11:19pm
Sooooo the guy who was with the man shot who says he was shot in the back is a liar... The family hired a famous guy to do an autopsy and he was not shot in the back.
G
gut
Posts: 15,058
Aug 18, 2014 12:39am
This all seems pretty simple: clearly the guy should lose his badge...and it seems pretty obvious this should end there.

Just a bad reaction from a [perhaps] under-trained cop. Really shouldn't be a story.