jmog;1601206 wrote:Strawman logical fallacy.

But it why would I expect anything less from you.

Flat earth society, really? That's the best you can do? People who believe the earth is flat against direct pictures from space, you know direct observable science, you liken to young earth creationists who are not faced with ANY observational science.

You keep trying to be funny with the dinosaurs and act like you are smarter than everyone else. But here goes.


No one wants to talk about the fact that many dinosaur fossils have been found with soft tissue in it. Soft tissue is impossible if the bones are millions of years old.

Explain how how the Bible, in the book of Job, exactly explains a brachiosaurus when the first dinosaur fossils were found in the 1800s and the book of Job was written many centuries BC?

Explain MANY ancient cultures with artwork exactly depicting dinosaurs interacting with humans?

Explain MANY cases of human fossilized footprints intermixed with dinosaur fossils and footprints?

Why are these dismissed and ignored by "mainstream" scientists and media? Because it doesn't fit the narrative.

jmog;1601355 wrote: 3. Tail like a cedar tree, mountains bring food (as in high up), large enough to drink up a whole river, strength/size in his legs and stomach, sounds like a primitive description of a brachiosaurus to me. What modern day animal would you say that describes oh wise one.

5. No one ever claimed 100% of the animals on the arc were full grown adults. Why couldn't baby dinosaurs, baby elephants, etc be chosen to save room. I know that would be way too hard to figure out right?

sleeper;1601703 wrote:A giraffe?

BoatShoes;1601668 wrote:1. It does not make me "a smart person" because I don't believe mythology actually happened! Jmog a smart person can believe totally ridiculous things. This is part of the Human Condition. You are smart person. You just believe totally ridiculous things like that there were baby dinosaurs taken onto a ship by a drunk so God could kill everybody with a flood and promise never to do it again with a rainbow.

2. It's not a straw man because I was able to draw out of you the fact that you actually believe this stuff. You've revealed that your position is indeed that weak. Again, life is too short. There is very likely no magical after life in Heaven with Jesus just like it is very likely that there are not werewolves so I have to make the most of this one and I can't do that by arguing with people who think Noah carried a baby Brachiosaurus onto an Ark.

3. Of Course that sounds like a dinosaur to you. You're talking about a made up story with multiple internal inconsistencies in the particular text of JOB that not to mention describes the Devil and God talking to eachother over playing with a man's life. It's all a bunch of mythology Jmog and didn't actually happen. Sorry. I don't care how Medusa was described before Perseus beheaded her and I don't care about the description of a "behemoth" in a poem about divine justice because I don't care to pretend that the events in that poem actually happened. It is fiction!

4. There is a plausible explanation for all of that just like there is a plausible explanation for hieroglyphics of what appear to be space men or UFO's. Maybe the History Channel should run a show called "Ancient Dinosaurs" with a bunch of Young Earth Creationists describing where and how Dinosaurs walked among us the same way they do with Aliens. Then the channel would really jump the shark even more so than it already has. There is not enough time in the day and you would not be convinced anyways.

But, Young Earth Creationism is not one of those examples and those Christians who are committed to science and reason should shun Young Earth Creationists from the public square just like they shun Harold Camping, Benny Hinn and all of the other charlatans.

jmog;1601908 wrote:Giraffes legs are skinny and it's tail is very small.

cruiser_96;1601709 wrote:You keep using that word... "Delusional". Is that analogous to believing nothing turned into something, or even the creation creating itself?

Aaah, yes. Delusional indeed. Thanks again.

Devils Advocate;1601925 wrote:

jmog;1601991 wrote:Let a=b=1
Therefore b^2=ab
Also, a^2=a^2
Now, subtract the 2nd equation from the first, this leads to...b^2-a^a=ab-a^2
Now Factor both sides (b-a)(b+a)=a(b-a)
Divide both sides by (b-a), b+a=a
Add 3 to both sides, b+a+3=a+3
But, b=a=1, therefore 1+1+3=1+3
Rearraging, 2+2=5

Mind blown...

All joking aside, can someone find the fault in that 'proof' without using google or the internet?

jmog;1601355 wrote:1. You are acting like you think you are smarter than everyone.
2. You keep resorting to straw man arguments and it ruins your points.
3. Tail like a cedar tree, mountains bring food (as in high up), large enough to drink up a whole river, strength/size in his legs and stomach, sounds like a primitive description of a brachiosaurus to me. What modern day animal would you say that describes oh wise one.
4. You still haven't explained the fact that ancient art work in pottery etc shows dinosaurs with humans and interlinking fossils do exist.
5. No one ever claimed 100% of the animals on the arc were full grown adults. Why couldn't baby dinosaurs, baby elephants, etc be chosen to save room. I know that would be way too hard to figure out right?

Automatik;1602017 wrote:Interesting.

What are your thoughts on Jonah and the Whale?

Devils Advocate;1602025 wrote:Actually, The story said it was a FISH. I guess that fish didn't survive the flood because there isn't a fish that big. sooooo. It must have been a Dinosaur! PROOF!!!!!

Heretic;1602033 wrote:I thought Jonah came after the flood. In which case, I figure that fish was rewarded for its service by taken to the same cartoon dimension that Spider-Man is from, where he became Monstro the whale and swallowed Pinocchio.

It all makes sense when you connect all the dots and realize that, at heart, all fictional characters wind up in the same universe.

Automatik;1602017 wrote:Interesting.

What are your thoughts on Jonah and the Whale?

Devils Advocate;1602025 wrote:Actually, The story said it was a FISH. I guess that fish didn't survive the flood because there isn't a fish that big. sooooo. It must have been a Dinosaur! PROOF!!!!!

jmog;1602071 wrote:Not sure to be honest, could just be a metaphorical story, could not be.

jmog;1602072 wrote:Chronologically no, Jonah happened well after the flood.

Automatik;1602078 wrote:How is it decided what stories are metaphorical or not?

jmog;1602071 wrote:Not sure to be honest, could just be a metaphorical story, could not be.

sleeper;1601990 wrote:Delusional is the best word to describe religious believers.

Also I've already addressed the point you keep bringing up in this thread about 'spontaneous generation' and 'something from nothing'. If that is your argument, who created god and why? If god always existed, why can't everything just have always existed? And since you are claiming that you know that a specific god did this and that, where is your evidence that convinced you your god is the correct god and how was this evidence collected? I patiently await your logical and well thought out response.